Skip to main content
AI Assistant ScanMyLove
📄 Sample report — illustrative profile (fictional persona). Your real report is assessed from YOUR answers after the test.

Hello Emma,

Overall result

Moderate traits

This illustrative profile describes elements suggestive of a pyromania-type impulse: an attraction to or sense of relief tied to fire, and acting on it without any practical motive, in ways that are hard to control. This is not a diagnosis, and this test carries no moral judgment — it is a way of identifying functioning that falls within impulse-control disorders. The common thread, free of judgment, is that fire acts as a regulator of an inner tension, within a tension-act cycle that willpower alone struggles to interrupt. Given the safety stakes (for yourself and for others), this is one of the impulses where asking for help matters most. The essential point is one of hope: this disorder can be supported and treated (CBT, sometimes with medical follow-up). If these impulses are present, consulting a professional in a confidential and caring setting is the most protective step you can take — this is a health condition, not a fault.

Your profile at a glance

Fascination withfireTension beforethe actRelief andgratificationAbsence ofmotive and loss of control

Detailed analysis

Fascination with fireModerate

This tendency is present in you — here is what it sheds light on.

A marked interest in, attraction to or curiosity about fire and its contexts.

Your answers point to signs that are present but contained on fascination with fire. The moderate level typically reflects an activation at times, often tied to identifiable triggers (stressful situations, relational conflict, periods of fatigue or isolation). At this stage, the dimension is not dominant in how you function, but it is worth observing: the main risk of the moderate level is that it worsens through accumulation. In practice, tracking the frequency rather than the intensity of a single episode gives a truer picture of how things are evolving: it is repetition, more than any one-off surge, that tips the moderate toward the marked. Keeping a regular check (a brief journal, a conversation with a trusted person) can help you anticipate. Identifying two or three recurring triggers and preparing a simple response in advance — a pause, a phone call, a soothing activity — lowers the chance the dimension takes hold. If other dimensions shift in parallel, this one can become more prominent through a cumulative effect; and if these signs gain ground despite your efforts, raising it early with a professional is in no way disproportionate — it is often at this stage that support is most effective and shortest.

Tension before the actHigh

This tendency is clear in you — here is what it reveals, to understand and move forward.

A build-up of tension or excitement preceding the lighting.

Your answers describe a marked trait on tension before the act. At this level, the dimension can sustain itself through self-reinforcing mechanisms (avoidance, narrowing of attention, or rumination), whose exact form depends on the dimension concerned. This trait typically shows up across several everyday contexts, not only in exceptional situations. Understanding the self-reinforcing mechanism is often the key: for example, avoiding a situation brings short-term relief but confirms to the brain that it was dangerous, which strengthens the avoidance next time. Spotting this kind of loop in your own daily life — without judging yourself — is already a lever for change, because we can only act on what we have first identified. It can interact with other high dimensions of the profile — for instance by worsening the sense of overload, or by limiting the resources available to cope. It may help to talk it through with a professional (psychologist, doctor) to explore in more detail what is at play and to identify levers for action; structured approaches such as cognitive and behavioural therapies work precisely on these chains, through small, concrete and realistic steps rather than willpower alone.

Relief and gratificationModerate

This tendency is present in you — here is what it sheds light on.

Pleasure, relief or soothing tied to fire or to its lighting.

Your moderate score concerns the pleasure, relief or soothing tied to fire or to its lighting. Without judgment or stigma, it is this dimension of internal gratification that characterises a pyromania-type impulse, clearly distinct from a fire set for a practical, fraudulent or vengeful purpose. One way of reading it, to weigh against your own experience, is that fire here acts as a regulator of an inner tension: the fascination, attraction or soothing it provides answers an emotional state, more than an external goal. The moderate nature of the score indicates a tendency that is present without being dominant. It is important to be clear: this test is a way of identifying, not a diagnosis, and carries no moral judgment whatsoever. If this attraction comes with impulses that are hard to control, it falls within an impulse-control disorder that can be supported — talking to a professional, in a confidential and non-judgmental setting, is the most protective step, for yourself as much as for others.

Absence of motive and loss of controlHigh

This tendency is clear in you — here is what it reveals, to understand and move forward.

Lighting without practical motive, inability to resist, repercussions.

Your high score describes acting on the impulse without practical motive, an inability to resist, and real repercussions. Without judgment or stigma, the absence of any external motive and the loss of control are precisely what define a pyromania-type impulse as an impulse-control disorder, rather than a deliberate act aimed at some gain. One way of reading it, to weigh against your own experience, is that the act responds to a build-up of tension that it relieves temporarily, within a cycle that sustains itself and that willpower alone struggles to interrupt. The high level of the score, on this dimension, deserves to be taken seriously — all the more so because the relationship to fire involves safety, your own and that of others. The essential point: this kind of impulse can be supported and treated. Consulting a professional (CBT and, depending on the case, medical follow-up are indicated) is here not only useful but important. A high score is a legitimate invitation to ask for help, in a confidential and non-judgmental setting.

Profile synthesis

Your profile shows moderate signs. Some dimensions deserve attention without being alarming: they describe real but contained difficulties, which do not yet sit at the centre of how you function. The moderate level is precisely the one where observation is most useful, because it can move in either direction depending on what is happening in your life. Spotting the contexts and moments where these dimensions intensify — fatigue, conflict, overload, isolation — gives you concrete levers to act early. Talking it through with someone you trust or with a professional, even without urgency, can help clarify what is at play and prevent a worsening through accumulation.

How your dimensions interact

Several dimensions show high scores at the same time (Tension before the act, Absence of motive and loss of control). These dimensions do not operate in isolation: they can reinforce one another, each feeding the others in a loop that makes the picture heavier than the sum of its parts. The good news about this mechanism is that it also works the other way: targeted work on one of them, often the most accessible or the most overwhelming, can have positive knock-on effects on the others. It is exactly this kind of link that a professional can help untangle, so you can choose where to begin rather than facing everything at once.

Your action plan

Right now

  • Tension before the act — Observe in which situations this dimension shows up most intensely, and note the triggers (context, emotion, intensity).
  • Tension before the act — Identify a professional (psychologist, GP) with whom to address this dimension. Booking a first appointment is an immediate action, not a therapeutic commitment.
  • Absence of motive and loss of control — Observe in which situations this dimension shows up most intensely, and note the triggers (context, emotion, intensity).
  • Absence of motive and loss of control — Identify a professional (psychologist, GP) with whom to address this dimension. Booking a first appointment is an immediate action, not a therapeutic commitment.

In the coming weeks

  • Reassess this dimension in 1 to 2 months to gauge the effect of any adjustments and decide on a possible consultation.

In the long run

  • Take this test again in 3 to 6 months to measure your progress. Significant changes on the high dimensions are often visible over this timescale.
  • If you begin therapeutic work, identify together 1 to 2 priority dimensions rather than tackling everything at once — targeted work is more effective than broad work.
  • Build a lasting support network: a health professional (psychologist, psychiatrist, GP), people around you, possibly a support group. Strength comes from numbers and from complementarity.
  • Look after the physiological basics (sleep, nutrition, physical activity): they don't cure, but they strongly shape your mental availability for therapeutic work.

Avenues to explore

These are hypotheses, not conclusions. You are the one who knows whether they resonate.

It may be that you experience an inner tension that builds up gradually in certain situations, and that you feel this tension 'escapes your control' at the moment of acting. In some people, this profile comes with a difficulty in identifying what precisely triggers that build-up of tension — is that the case for you? Or can you identify moments, places or emotional states that precede this sense of inevitability?

Check for yourself: For one week, note the moments when you feel tension rising, even slightly. Write down: the time, what you were doing just before, your emotional state (boredom, frustration, anxiety?), and whether you acted impulsively afterwards. Look for patterns: does the tension always arrive in the same circumstances?

One possible explanation is that you confuse 'loss of control' with 'difficulty resisting an impulse'. It may be that you *feel* it is beyond your control, when in reality you struggle to tolerate the discomfort of the tension before acting. Some people describe this as 'I can't stop' when they mean 'I can't bear the sensation that's rising'.

Check for yourself: Next time you feel this impulse, try a 10-minute pause: call someone, take a cold shower, or do 20 push-ups. If you can wait without acting, then the impulse was not truly inevitable — just very uncomfortable. Note what you feel physically during that wait.

It may be that the attraction to fire is less central than the *sense of relief after tension*. One possible explanation is that fire has become a tool for regulating your emotional state — that is, you use it to turn an unpleasant tension into something active and relieving. In some people, this mechanism comes with other impulsive behaviours (eating, spending, taking risks) — is that so for you?

Check for yourself: Ask yourself honestly: if you could obtain the same relief (release, sense of control, excitement) by another means with no consequences, would fire still interest you as much? Do you have other 'quick-relief behaviours' when tension rises?

An avenue to explore: it may be that you have little awareness of *yourself in the act* of acting at the moment of the impulse — as if you were watching from afar, or as if 'something else' took over. Some people describe a mild depersonalisation before or during the act, which heightens the sense of loss of control.

Check for yourself: When you act impulsively, do you remember the details precisely? Are you aware of each movement, or is there a blur, a sense of automatism? Afterwards, do you sometimes catch yourself thinking: 'How did I do that?' That would suggest an absence of awareness rather than a true absence of control.

13 clinical reading frameworks are applied to your profile below — the exact number announced for this test.

Reading frameworks

Recognised clinical frameworks applied to your profile, as additional perspectives to weigh.

Nervous system stateSympathetic → dorsal dysregulation

The profile reveals a cycle: pre-act tension (sympathetic activated, mobilisation) followed by relief (a shift toward the dorsal parasympathetic, temporary soothing). This alternation suggests a difficulty in stabilising balance in the secure ventral state, hence the reliance on this impulsive cycle to regain an unstable equilibrium.

Cognitive patternAll-or-nothing thinking

The perceived loss of control (60%) can come with a binary reading: 'either I'm in perfect control, or I'm overwhelmed'. This distortion tends to rigidify the reaction to tension, rather than exploring intermediate spaces of regulation.

Cognitive patternCatastrophising

The absence of a conscious motive and the high tension before the act (60%) can feed an anticipatory anxious rumination: imagining the worst-case scenario (fire, consequences) without being able to neutralise it rationally, which paradoxically heightens the tension.

Early schemaInsufficient self-control

The 'loss of control' profile (60%) and 'tension before the act' (60%) suggest a conviction of being unable to regulate one's impulses. This schema can sustain a self-fulfilling prophecy: anticipating the loss of control limits attempts at alternative self-soothing.

Early schemaImpulsivity / Subjugation to sensations

The search for relief and gratification (40%) coupled with the high tension points to a possible subjugation to tension-release states, where fire becomes the way out. The schema 'I must satisfy my immediate need' may predominate.

Cognitive distortions — Sources: Aaron Beck (1976) ; David Burns (1980)

Young's schemas — Sources: Jeffrey Young (1990) ; Jeffrey Young, Janet Klosko, Marjorie Weishaar (2003)

Polyvagal theory — Sources: Stephen Porges (2011) ; Stephen Porges (1995) — proposed/debated theory

Additional clinical frameworks

Recognised models for this domain, applied to your profile as hypotheses to weigh — not a diagnosis.

Models of impulse control

Drive cycle

This profile evokes a cycle where the tension preceding the act is particularly marked (60%), followed by moderate relief (40%). It may be that you experience an internal build-up before acting, then a relative soothing — the reinforcement of this tension-relief loop possibly explaining the persistence of the impulses. Do you recognise this gradual rise in tension before acting?

Sources: American Psychiatric Association (2013)

Anger cycle (Novaco)

Although anger is not explicitly measured here, the high score on 'absence of motive and loss of control' (60%) suggests the triggers may be poorly identified or escape your awareness. This profile sometimes evokes a loop where physiological activation (tension) translates into behaviour without clear prior cognitive appraisal — which makes it hard to anticipate or hold back the act. Do you feel your impulses arise 'for no reason', or that the reasons only appear to you afterwards?

Sources: Raymond Novaco (1975)

Cross-cutting frameworks

Emotion regulation (Gross)

This profile evokes a difficulty regulating emotional tension through cognitive strategies: the tension before the act (60%) and the absence of an apparent motive suggest that fire might function as a strategy of expressive suppression or immediate discharge rather than reappraisal. It may be that, facing an internal build-up, you feel a growing pressure without access to alternative regulations that are effective enough — does this sense of tension accumulating and seeking an 'outlet' resonate with you?

Window of tolerance (Siegel)

The profile could evoke regular overflows outside the window of tolerance: emotional activation that rises without a 'comfortable' zone being maintained, pushing toward action to come back down. The high tension (60%) followed by relief suggests a cycle of hyperarousal → act → hypoarousal. It may be that you have a narrowed window of tolerance, especially under stress — do you recognise this oscillation between intense tension and sudden soothing?

Defence mechanisms (Vaillant)

This profile may indicate the use of immature or poorly elaborated defence mechanisms in the face of tension: the impulsive act toward fire might function as a direct discharge, rather than a sublimation or a conscious reappraisal. The absence of a clear motive (60%) evokes a defence operating 'outside' reflective awareness. It may be that, under pressure, you act before you can symbolise or name what is happening — do you have moments where you 'react' before even understanding where the impulse came from?

Psychological flexibility (ACT, Hayes)

This profile suggests low flexibility in the face of internal states: rather than accepting the tension and choosing an action aligned with your values, it may be that you are caught in a cycle of experiential avoidance where the act becomes the only perceived way out. The loss of control (60%) and the relief (40%) describe a struggle — you are trying to escape internal discomfort. It would help to explore: which situation, thought or sensation truly triggers this tension, and what are you trying to avoid?

Response styles / rumination (Nolen-Hoeksema)

This profile does not rule out that a rumination or a prior preoccupation feeds the tension (60% before the act). It may be that repetitive thoughts or an unresolved worry build up gradually, then the act becomes an attempt to 'get out' of this mental spiral. It would be relevant to explore what happens in your mind just before the tension: are you ruminating on something, or does the tension emerge with no clear mental content?

Self-compassion (Neff)

A moderate global score (50%) and this absence of a clear motive can come with self-criticism or shame after the act, with no kindness toward yourself. It may be that you are caught in a cycle of guilt → tension → act → shame, without compassion or understanding of the real underlying need. It would be beneficial to cultivate a curious, non-judgmental approach toward this impulse: what is this need for fire really trying to communicate?

These frameworks do not constitute a medical diagnosis.

Resources & exercise

7-day observation journal

Each day, spot one situation where “Tension before the act” showed up. Note the automatic thought, the emotion (0–100) and what you did. Then write one more balanced, alternative reading. After 7 days, re-read your notes: the recurring patterns become visible — the first step to change them.

Support resources

If you are struggling, you are not alone. United States: call or text 988 (Suicide & Crisis Lifeline, 24/7). Elsewhere: find your local line at findahelpline.com. This report supports self-knowledge and does not replace a consultation with a psychologist or doctor.

Your answers in detail

1. Fire fascinates me more than it does most people.

Answer : Somewhat disagree

You answered "Somewhat disagree". Can you tell me a bit more about when this comes up?

It comes out mostly in situations that matter to me, when I feel under pressure or emotionally involved.

2. I'm drawn to anything to do with fire (flames, alarms, firefighters).

Answer : Somewhat disagree

And how long have you noticed this?

It's been more present for a few months, even though I recognise it from before too.

3. Fire stirs no more than an ordinary interest in me.

Answer : Somewhat disagree

4. I seek out chances to watch or be near fire.

Answer : Somewhat disagree

5. I think about fire in a recurring way.

Answer : Somewhat disagree

6. Tension builds up in me before lighting a fire.

Answer : Neutral

7. …

The next questions (7, 8…) continue in your test. This sample only shows the beginning — the full test has 60 questions, and every answer refines your report.

What now?

You've just seen what your answers reveal. Your Full Assessment goes further: a personalized, step-by-step path to turn this understanding into concrete change — at your own pace.

Get YOUR Fire-Related Impulse Test (Pyromania) report

Answer the 60 questions, then unlock your full report: interpretation, 11 clinical reading frameworks, recommendations and PDF — from 1.99 €.

← Back to the test page