Our psychological tests

This general assessment is the starting point for understanding how you function psychologically. In a single test, it explores thirteen dimensions: anxiety, depressive mood, self-esteem, stress, relationships, sleep, concentration, emotional regulation, resilience, life satisfaction, anger management and general well-being. It fits you if you don't know where to start and want a wide map of your strengths and areas to improve, before being guided toward the specialized tests. Themes: mental health, assessment, comprehensive.

This assessment explores the five core dimensions of personality (emotional stability, openness to experience, conscientiousness, agreeableness, extraversion), then adds optimism and positive temperament, authenticity and consistency, tolerance and openness to others, self-control and temperance, and inner security and solidity of self. It fits anyone taking stock of their character and profile in a single sitting, whether at a turning point or simply out of curiosity about how they tick. Built around personality, the big five and temperament, it draws a full portrait rather than a single label.

This test examines four antisocial traits: rule-breaking, impulsivity and irresponsibility, callousness and low remorse, aggression. It sheds light on a personal tendency to transgress as much as on a relationship shaped by these patterns day after day. It touches on antisocial traits, transgression and impulsivity within Cluster B (DSM-5), the same territory as dark triad discussions.

This test evaluates self-expression, conflict management, boundary setting, and confidence in interactions. Saying no, holding a boundary and disagreeing are distinct balances, and they do not give way together. The report locates the moment speech withdraws: in front of whom, on which subjects, at what stage of the exchange. Centered on self-affirmation, communication and boundaries.

This test measures openness to experience, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism, following the most studied model in personality psychology. It provides a scientific, readable benchmark rather than a throwaway quiz, useful for taking stock or for comparing a self-image against the five core traits. Centered on personality, the big five and the OCEAN model, it maps where a person sits on each of the six dimensions measured rather than sorting them into a box.

This test looks at emotional instability, fear of abandonment, relational and self-image instability, and impulsivity. Its reference points come from the DSM-5 and the MSI-BPD scale. It sheds light on recognizing these patterns in oneself as much as on loving someone whose intensity keeps pulling them off balance. Framed around borderline traits and emotional instability within Cluster B (DSM-5), it names the pattern rather than reducing anyone to it.

This test measures fear of abandonment, need for approval, difficulty with solitude, and self-erasure. It sheds light on one side of the bond only, that of the person answering, and shows which of these four movements fires first. It speaks to anyone who feels overly dependent on a partner's or a friend's approval and would like to rebuild steadier ground of their own. Built around emotional dependency, attachment, and emotional autonomy.

This test places the profile among the 9 Enneagram types, from the Perfectionist to the Peacemaker, taking in the Helper, Achiever, Individualist, Investigator, Loyalist, Enthusiast and Challenger. It looks for the engine rather than the label: what sets the effort off, what lies feared underneath, and the gap between the top two motivations. Centered on the enneagram, personality, and motivation.

This test looks at social inhibition, feelings of inadequacy, sensitivity to rejection, and the thwarted desire for connection. It locates the moment the decision to pull out is taken, often well before the situation itself. It sheds light on a personal habit of hanging back as much as on a relationship shaped by these traits. Framed around avoidant traits and social inhibition within Cluster C (DSM-5).

This test examines attention seeking, expressiveness and theatricality, suggestibility, and seductiveness with shallow bonds. It covers the intensity of these movements, their cost, and the situations in which they run away. It sheds light on recognizing that need to be seen as much as on living alongside these traits in a partner or relative. Framed around histrionic traits and attention seeking within Cluster B (DSM-5), it names the pattern without labeling the person.

This test measures emotional sensitivity, sensory sensitivity, social sensitivity, and depth of processing. These sensitivities do not rise together: the report shows which ones weigh, and on which ground. It is for anyone wondering whether they are a highly sensitive person and wanting to understand how they work. Centered on high sensitivity, emotional depth, and empathy.

This test examines five skills that, unlike temperament, can be learned and assessed: self-awareness, self-regulation, motivation, empathy, and social skills. They are acquired separately; the report shows which one is missing and the gap between them, which often says more than a total. It is for anyone wanting to understand how they experience and handle emotions, at work or in relationships, and to spot where their strengths lie. Centered on emotional intelligence, EQ, and empathy.

This test places a person on the introversion-extraversion spectrum, where most of us sit, somewhere between the reserved introvert and the outgoing extrovert. It explores the energy source, the communication style, the socialization mode, and the ideal work environment, ambiversion included. These positions do not cancel each other out: someone can love people and still need silence. Centered on introversion, extraversion, and the social.

This test explores internal control, the weight given to the power of others, and how much is attributed to luck and fate. That underlying belief quietly shapes motivation day to day. The three coexist in everyone: the report gives their proportions and shows which one takes over at the moment of a failure. It is for anyone wanting to understand their relationship to responsibility and motivation, especially in the face of success or failure. Centered on locus of control, autonomy, and control.

This test explores five dimensions of narcissistic personality: grandiosity, need for admiration, lack of empathy and exploitation, and narcissistic vulnerability. It addresses narcissistic traits linked to the DSM-5 cluster B, and separates the grandiose form, which puts itself on display, from the vulnerable form, sensitive to shame and to criticism. The report sets out the intensity of each dimension and describes how they combine.

This test explores five dimensions: mistrust, hypervigilance, doubt about loyalty, and resentment and touchiness. It looks at paranoid personality traits tied to the DSM-5 cluster A: malicious intent read into others without sufficient evidence, constant attention paid to signals of danger, the reliability of close people repeatedly questioned, offenses held on to and chewed over. The report sets out the intensity of each and the time they take up.

This test explores four facets of perfectionism: personal standards, fear of mistakes, doubts about actions, and perceived social pressure. It separates how high the standards you set yourself are from how rigid they are, what the prospect of a mistake sets off, the difficulty of signing off your own work, and the share that comes from other people's assumed gaze. The report shows which of these springs keeps the others going.

This test explores the three components of the dark triad: narcissism, Machiavellianism, and subclinical psychopathy. It covers the sense of superiority and the appetite for admiration, the strategic calculation and the cynical read on relationships, and the impulsiveness paired with a thin emotional echo. Each is placed along a continuum, together with the settings — work, authority, close relationships — where it comes out strongest.

This test explores five ways of reasoning: analytical thinking, creative thinking, practical thinking, reflective thinking, and intuitive thinking. It covers structured logic, the production of unexpected ideas, concrete action, the need to step back before deciding, and reading a situation on instinct. The report identifies the dominant cognitive mode and what that implies for studying or for work.

This test explores four professional styles: Dominance, Influence, Steadiness, and Conscientiousness. It covers how you drive at a result and take on an obstacle, how you carry people along and win them over, how you hold to steadiness and cooperation, and how you lean on rules and precision. The report gives a score on each axis and describes what you expect from a professional exchange — a frequent source of disagreements that are not about the facts.

This test explores five domains of emotional schemas formed in childhood: disconnection and rejection, impaired autonomy, impaired limits, other-directedness, and overvigilance and inhibition. It draws on Young's early maladaptive schemas, schema therapy and attachment. The report stays with what operates today and places each domain alongside the precise trigger that activates it.

This test explores five dimensions: emotional detachment, preference for solitude, social indifference, and inner world. It addresses the emotional detachment and social isolation linked to schizoid personality: how rarely emotion is expressed, the deliberate choice of solitude, the indifference to opinions and social expectation, and the space a private inner life occupies. The report tells a withdrawal that is chosen apart from one that is merely settled for.

This test explores five dimensions: magical thinking and ideas of reference, unusual perceptual experiences, social withdrawal and anhedonia, and eccentricity and speech. It looks at schizotypal traits in the cluster A, drawing on the SPQ and DSM-5: the belief in meaningful connections, unusual perceptions, withdrawal paired with a sense of standing apart, and a way of expressing yourself that those around you find original. The report lists these experiences and the circumstances in which they come back.

This test explores five dimensions: energy (E/I), information (S/N), decision (T/F), and organization (J/P). It places the answers on four independent axes: where energy is drawn from, how information is processed — concrete facts or possibilities — what a decision leans on — logic or human impact — and the relationship with planning. It builds on Jungian typology and a psychological type close to the MBTI. The report accounts for the sharpness of each axis as much as for the combination obtained.

This test explores five dimensions: persistent self-doubt, fear of being exposed, external attribution of successes, and unfavorable comparison. It touches on self-confidence, self-esteem and a sense of legitimacy: the constant questioning of your own legitimacy, the apprehension of being found out, the habit of handing your successes over to something external, and the comparison that systematically comes out against you. The report indicates which of these movements feeds the others.

This test explores five dimensions: emotionality, activity, sociability, and impulsivity or deliberation. It covers how strong and how frequent your emotions are, your energy level and your tempo, your appetite for human company, and the delay between wanting something and doing it. It touches on temperament, character and sociability, and describes what these settings imply for the way a day is laid out.

This full assessment reviews attentional functioning across eleven dimensions: inattention, hyperactivity, impulsivity, executive functions, time management and procrastination, emotional regulation, working memory, attention regulation, inner restlessness, and functional impact on daily life. It is built for adults who want a structured, wide-angle overview of their profile. The themes it touches on are attention, focus, and impulsivity.

This test explores four distinct facets of attentional ability: sustained attention, selective attention, distractibility, and organization. It is for anyone who wants to understand exactly where and when their focus breaks down, whether at work or during the ordinary tasks that fill a day. The themes it covers are attention, concentration, and organization.

This test explores five executive functions — planning, cognitive flexibility, inhibition, working memory, and initiation — the brain's quiet coordinators, which govern starting a task, switching between several at once, and holding an instruction in mind just long enough to act on it. It is useful when organization quickly feels overwhelming, or out of curiosity about the way cognitive activity is regulated from moment to moment. The themes it touches are planning, inhibition, and working memory.

This test focuses on four clearly defined dimensions of adult hyperactivity: motor restlessness (moving, tapping, the discomfort of imposed stillness), verbal impulsivity (interrupting, answering before the end), and the need for stimulation. It speaks to anyone who recognizes in themselves that surplus of energy and the recurring difficulty of putting on the brakes, whether in a meeting, at the table, or waiting in a line. The themes it covers are hyperactivity, impulsivity, and restlessness.

This test screens for ADHD symptoms in adults, sweeping four broad domains of the condition: inattention (losing the thread, forgetting a commitment, letting go of anything dull), hyperactivity (internal restlessness, impatience, the need for stimulation), impulsivity (acting or speaking before thinking), and executive functioning (planning, ranking, starting, and holding an organization over time). It is designed for adults who want to organize and lay out their impressions clearly. The themes it covers are attention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity.

This test assesses four clearly separate areas of impact: professional, relational, time management, and emotional regulation. ADHD isn't only about symptoms: it seeps into work, colors relationships, and quietly complicates the way days get run. It is meant for those who are already familiar with ADHD and now want to gauge, in concrete terms, the real toll it takes on their everyday life. The themes it covers are impact at work, relationships, and emotions.

This in-depth assessment reviews the facets of how anxiety works: generalized worry, social anxiety, panic attacks, health anxiety, performance anxiety, physical symptoms, avoidance and safety behaviors, chronic stress and overload, rumination and anticipation, and functional impact. Built for anyone facing diffuse anxiety who wants clarity before acting, it helps identify which dimensions of anxiety, stress and rumination are most active.

This test explores everyday anxiety across five areas: excessive worry, physical symptoms, avoidance, concentration and sleep. It speaks to anyone living with a constant background tension who wants to see where it settles. In a few minutes, it locates how worry, stress and somatization weigh on daily life.

This test examines the relationship with success across five dimensions: pressure to succeed, fear of failure, anxious procrastination and social comparison. Designed for anyone who piles pressure on themselves at work, in exams or on personal projects, it helps make sense of how perfectionism and comparison feed anxiety. It marks out what blocks action beforehand and what keeps it going afterwards.

This test explores health anxiety across four areas: somatic preoccupation, checking behaviors, reassurance seeking and catastrophization. It is aimed at anyone who scans their body for anomalies, repeatedly searches symptoms online or constantly seeks reassurance from doctors and loved ones. It measures how much bodily monitoring, symptom checking and medical worry take up in daily life and thoughts, around the recurring themes of somatization, hypochondria and cyberchondria.

This test explores separation anxiety in adulthood across four dimensions: separation distress, fear of loss and emotional dependency. It speaks to anyone who dreads absence, abandonment or distance in their most important bonds. It gauges the intensity of the attachment and how the fear of losing someone weighs on relationships, around the themes of separation and emotional dependency.

This test explores social anxiety across five dimensions: fear of judgment, social avoidance, physical symptoms and anticipatory anxiety. It is meant for anyone who dreads speaking in groups, being watched or judged, blushes or trembles in public, and replays interactions long afterwards. It measures how the fear of judgment, physical reactions and avoidance shape relationships and everyday choices, somewhere between marked shyness and social phobia.

This test explores panic disorder across five dimensions: attack frequency, symptom intensity, agoraphobia and bodily hypervigilance. It is aimed at anyone who experiences sudden surges of panic, monitors their heartbeat and breathing with dread, fears another attack or avoids places where a crisis would be hard to handle. It locates the frequency and intensity of panic attacks and the weight of avoidance in daily movements, around the themes of panic and agoraphobia.

This bipolar test explores episodes of elevation (euphoria, reduced need for sleep, racing thought), the impulsivity that clusters in the high phases, depressive episodes, the cyclicity of these shifts and their impact on daily functioning. It is designed for anyone questioning marked, recurring mood changes, touching on the themes of hypomania and mood swings.

This burnout test explores four different sides of professional exhaustion: emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, loss of accomplishment and professional cynicism. It is meant for anyone facing lasting wear-and-tear in their working life who wants a clearer, calmer picture of where they stand, around the themes of stress and professional exhaustion.

This depression test is a self-assessment that explores depressed mood, anhedonia (loss of pleasure), cognitive symptoms and somatic symptoms felt over the past two weeks. It is for anyone wanting to take stock of how they have been feeling lately, around the themes of mental health and mood.

This stress management test explores how well stress and its signals are identified, coping strategies, the capacity for relaxation and adaptation to pressure. It suits anyone wanting to understand their resources better and build resilience day to day, around the themes of coping and adaptation.

This mental rumination test explores dwelling on the past, negative anticipation, self-criticism and the negative spiral the mind can fall into. It is for anyone who feels caught in repetitive, draining thinking and wants to gauge how far it reaches into daily life, around the themes of negative thoughts and mindfulness.

This chronic stress test explores mental overload, physical tension, exhaustion and irritability that quietly set in when pressure lasts far too long. It is for anyone going through a stretch of prolonged overwork who wants to check their warning signals before things tip over, around the themes of fatigue and exhaustion.

This post-traumatic stress test explores re-experiencing, avoidance, hyperarousal and the negative cognitions that can follow a shock. It is for anyone dealing with the aftermath of a traumatic event who wants to better understand what they feel and put words on it, around the themes of trauma and flashbacks.

This test explores five dimensions of anhedonia: social pleasure, sensory pleasure, the ability to anticipate positive moments, and the gradual withdrawal from leisure activities. Anhedonia occurs when activities, people, or simple pleasures that once brought joy no longer produce any positive emotion — neither during, nor even in anticipation. It is aimed at anyone wondering why nothing seems to interest or appeal to them any more.

This test looks at dysthymia (persistent depressive disorder), characterized by low mood present most of the time over many months, of moderate but very persistent intensity. It explores baseline mood, symptom duration, their impact on daily life, and the distinction from a major depressive episode. It is for anyone wanting to understand a chronic low mood better, particularly when it lasts without a clear acute episode.

This full assessment explores eleven dimensions of obsessive-compulsive functioning: obsessions and intrusive thoughts, compulsions and rituals, checking, contamination and washing, order and symmetry, taboo thoughts, doubt and the need for certainty, perfectionism and rigidity, mental rumination, and distress with functional impact. It gives a structured, detailed overview of obsessions and compulsions rather than a vague impression. The themes it covers are OCD, obsessions, and rumination.

This test explores the key dimensions of the experience: the frequency of intrusions, the distress they cause, the attempts to control them, and thought-action fusion, that sense that thinking something is almost the same as doing it. It shows the grip these thoughts hold in daily life. The themes it covers are intrusive thoughts, anxiety, and mental control.

This test explores four facets of perfectionism: unrealistic standards, fear of mistakes, perfectionist procrastination, and self-criticism. It sheds light on the pull between the ambition that drives a person and the exhaustion that the very same perfectionism ends up causing over time. The themes it covers are perfectionism, fear of mistakes, and procrastination.

This test gauges, across five dimensions, the intensity of compulsive behaviors, repetitive acts, visible or mental, performed in response to an obsession or according to rigid rules: checking rituals, washing and contamination, ordering and symmetry, counting and repetition. It locates how much space these acts take up in an ordinary day and how much energy they quietly demand. The themes it covers are OCD, compulsions, and checking.

This test gauges the intensity of obsessional thoughts across five dimensions: intrusive thoughts, pathological doubt, the need for control, and obsessional guilt. The obsessional side is distinct from compulsions, the acts carried out to bring the distress down; this test covers the first, and pins down its real intensity and how often it surfaces. The themes it covers are OCD, obsessions, and doubt.

This in-depth assessment maps eleven dimensions of how you love and connect: attachment security, communication, conflict management, emotional intimacy, trust and managing jealousy, emotional autonomy, boundaries and assertiveness, clarity in the face of manipulation, commitment and projection, and balance. It leans on the cross-readings: solid communication resting on an insecure base does not produce the same effects as solid communication resting on a secure one. The report gives the order in which to take them up.

This test explores four sides of codependency: self-sacrifice, the need for control, low self-esteem and blurred boundaries. It covers your own needs erased in favor of the other person's, the approval you need before you feel you belong, the line between your feelings and theirs gone blurred, and the urge to manage the other person's mood in the name of helping. It works around codependency, boundaries and self-esteem, and looks at one side of the tie only, yours.

This test explores four pillars of how you communicate as a couple: active listening, self-expression, conflict management and emotional intimacy. It covers how much listening actually happens, how a need gets voiced without being swallowed or imposed, what happens as disagreement rises, and how much room vulnerability is given. The report looks for the exact point where the exchange tips, the one that brings the same sequence back on different subjects.

This test explores four forms of empathy: cognitive empathy, affective empathy, compassion and emotional contagion. It covers understanding another's point of view without living it, feeling what they feel, taking in their pain without getting lost in it, and absorbing the mood in the room despite yourself. The report places each of these capacities and the gap between them, which is where relational exhaustion most often comes from.

This test explores five mechanics of gaslighting: denial of reality, the doubt planted about your memory and perception, blame reversal, discrediting and isolation, and its impact on your self-confidence. It works around manipulation, coercive control and toxic relationships, describes these mechanisms and how often they occur, and stays with what can be observed from your side.

This test explores five dimensions of life after infidelity: betrayal trauma, the signs and intuition you notice, the barriers to forgiveness and rebuilding, and the decisional confusion. It covers how strong the reactions tied to the betrayal are, how often signs and suspicions come up, what is blocking any rebuilding, and how confused the decision currently is. It works around cheating, betrayal trauma and forgiveness, and says where you stand.

This test explores four drivers of jealousy: insecurity, surveillance, social comparison and emotional reactions. It covers the underlying insecurity, the checking behaviors, the comparison with other people, and what comes out when the feeling takes over. It works around jealousy, trust and insecurity, and looks at the machinery rather than the content of the suspicions.

This test explores five signs of manipulation and emotional abuse: gaslighting, guilt-tripping, emotional blackmail, blame reversal, and the power context around you — at home or at work. It covers your perception called into question, guilt used to win the point, veiled threats of affection withdrawn, the reversal in which the other becomes the victim, and a professional position used to keep you quiet. The report gives each one its name and its frequency.

This test explores the disrespect you may be experiencing across five dimensions: being belittled and put down, lack of recognition, boundaries crossed and the impact on your self-esteem. It picks up the remarks that belittle, the efforts never acknowledged, the refusals that are not respected, and the accumulated effect on what you believe you are worth. It focuses on the repetition more than on the isolated episode, and gives its frequency and the area where it concentrates.

This test explores the experience of not being listened to through five dimensions: being interrupted or having the other person monopolize the exchange, not being listened to and minimized, conversational invisibility, and withdrawal with its effect on your self-esteem. It covers having what you say minimized, decisions taken without consulting you, and the settling idea that your view counts for little. Focused on listening, communication and assertiveness, it looks at the repetition of these situations.

This test explores five mechanics of narcissistic abuse: the idealization / devaluation cycle, coercive control and isolation, manipulation and gaslighting, lack of empathy, and its impact on you. It covers the alternation between idealization and disparagement, the tightening around who you see, the distortions of reality and reversals of blame, the indifference to what you are going through, and the exhaustion that follows. The report focuses on the dynamic and on the facet it began with.

This fear of abandonment test looks at four sides of how you experience closeness: separation anxiety, need for reassurance, hypersensitivity to rejection, and the avoidance strategies — clinging on, pulling away first, sabotaging it. It covers the distress at the moment of separation, the need for regular proof, and reading rejection into a neutral gesture, around the themes of abandonment, attachment, and rejection. The report looks for what those opposite moves have in common.

This test weighs four things: your deeper motivations for wanting to return — attachment, fear of the empty space, refusal to have failed — the real quality of the former relationship, your current emotional state, and the signals your ex is sending. It explores the themes of reconciliation, separation, and getting back together. The report locates in particular the moment the urge shows up, since a peak of longing cannot be seen from inside.

This test looks at the other person's behavior in the relationship, and at what it does to you — it does not assess your personality. It examines four specific dynamics: manipulation, control, devaluation, and isolation. You explore the themes of coercive control, manipulation, and psychological harm, based on concrete everyday situations. The report cuts into four a dynamic that settled in slowly and is hard to see from inside.

This breakup test takes stock of four parts of the journey: romantic grief, post-breakup self-esteem, rumination and obsessions, and your capacity for rebuilding your life afterwards. It covers how far the loss has been accepted, what the separation did to your image of yourself, how much room the looping thoughts take, and the ability to picture anything beyond. You explore the themes of separation, grief, and rebuilding.

This test assesses five dimensions of life as a couple: dyadic consensus, dyadic satisfaction, dyadic cohesion, and affectional expression. It covers how much you agree on the things that commit you, overall contentment and the solidity of the bond, the time actually spent together, and tenderness and physical intimacy. It treats them separately and indicates which one gave way, since these four rarely drop at the same time.

This relationship patterns test brings four gears of the script that replays into focus: recurring partner choice, old roots, fixed role, and unconscious cycle. It covers the kind of person your attraction goes toward, what your current bonds borrow from something older, the position you end up occupying — supporting, giving in, controlling, rescuing — and how automatic the cycle stays despite your clear-sightedness. You explore the themes of relationship patterns, attachment, and repetition.

This test explores the dynamic of a "situationship" through five dimensions: status ambiguity, investment asymmetry, anxious uncertainty and misaligned expectations. It covers the gap between what each of you puts in, the churning over what happens next, and the distance between what you want and what the other person wants. Centered on the relationship with no name, on attachment and on commitment, the report separates something light that both people have chosen from a blur that is simply endured.

This attachment style test maps four broad profiles that describe how adults relate: secure, anxious, avoidant, and disorganized attachment. It covers comfort with closeness, the fear of being left and the need for reassurance, emotion held at a distance, and the swing between wanting closeness and dreading it. You explore the themes of emotional security, trust, and attachment, drawn from concrete everyday situations. The report gives their proportion, since these four styles blend and shift from one relationship to the next.

This trauma bond test explores four gears of the traumatic bond: the violence-reconciliation cycle, the inability to leave despite being aware, intermittent reinforcement, and the gap between what you understand and what you manage to do. It covers tension and intense reconciliation taking turns, the impossibility of staying away despite the attempts, and the hook made by good moments that come without any pattern. You explore the themes of intermittent reinforcement, betrayal bonds, and abuse.

This wide-ranging assessment reviews specific phobias, agoraphobia and social phobia, avoidance and anxious anticipation, physical fear reactions, then screen addiction, social-media addiction and emotional dependency, through to compulsive behaviors and their functional impact. It gives a full picture when several issues overlap, before digging into one area. It touches on the themes of phobias, addiction and dependency.

This test explores five dimensions of your relationship with screens: compulsive use, withdrawal signs when access is cut off, the social impact on your relationships and loss of control over screen time. It applies to adults and teenagers alike, and touches on the themes of addiction, screens and compulsive behavior. The report gives the point in the day where the slide begins and the precise gesture an adjustment can act on.

This test looks at five dimensions: compulsive use, tolerance and escalation toward more intense content, the intimate and relational impact on your partnership, and the loss of control and distress that can follow. It covers how automatic turning to it has become, whether stronger material is now needed for the same effect, the effects on your actual sex life, and what attempts to stop produce. Themes covered: addiction, sexuality and compulsive behavior.

This test measures five dimensions: compulsive checking of your apps, social comparison against others, FOMO (fear of missing out) and the impact on your self-esteem. It explores the themes of social media, comparison and self-esteem. The report indicates which of these movements dominates, and that decides which adjustment is worth making: a time limit does nothing against comparison, and unfollowing does not calm a check that has become a reflex.

This test assesses your reaction to four kinds of situations: open spaces, transportation, crowds and enclosed spaces — wide open squares, transportation whose stops you do not choose, heavily crowded places, and enclosed spots where the exits are few. It also weighs the everyday territory avoidance has already taken. Themes explored: agoraphobia, open spaces, crowds and anxiety.

This test covers four distinct grounds: video games, online shopping, content consumption and constant communication. It assesses them separately, where a single overall total lets them offset one another, and shows which specific form of digital use weighs most. Themes covered: internet addiction, video games and digital habits.

This test explores five dimensions: the need for fusion, the fear of loneliness, self-sacrifice and idealization of the partner. It covers the need to be in constant contact, what being alone represents, the room left for your own needs, and the share of idealization carried towards the other person. Themes worked through: emotional dependency, attachment and relationships.

This test examines five dimensions: everyday interactions, performance situations, the sense of being observed and your capacity for assertiveness. One and the same overall score can cover four different realities, which do not call for the same exercises: the report indicates which one weighs, and from what threshold. Themes explored: social phobia, social anxiety and confidence.

This test sweeps four broad families of fear: animals and insects, heights and spaces, blood and medical settings, and social situations. It measures how far the avoidance built around each one reaches, often further than the fear itself, and indicates how much the organization of everyday life has been altered by it. Themes covered: phobias, fears and anxiety.

This test explores five dimensions: food restriction, compulsive eating, body image and compensation behaviors. It covers the rules laid down about what is allowed and forbidden, the episodes where control gives way, how the body appears to you and the power that image holds, and whatever is put in place afterwards to make up for it. Themes covered: eating disorders, food and body image.

This panoramic assessment explores eleven dimensions in a single journey: emotional neglect, rejection and abandonment wounds, humiliation and devaluation, injustice and rigidity, parentification, significant trauma, the wounded inner child, family loyalties and impact in adulthood. Built for those who want the full picture rather than a single isolated test, it covers themes of wounds, emotional neglect and abandonment.

Based on the five core wounds model, this test explores each in turn, the rejection wound, the abandonment wound, the humiliation wound, the betrayal wound and the injustice wound, to highlight the ones that resonate most. It suits anyone starting a personal development journey or drawn to the idea of masks and inner healing. It touches on the themes of childhood wounds and inner work.

This test explores emotional deprivation across five dimensions: lack of affection, lack of validation, lack of security, and the coping strategies built over time. Useful when relationships keep reactivating old unmet emotional needs, or when self-esteem and attachment style come into question. It covers the themes of emotional deprivation, attachment and emotional needs.

This test explores the four facets of the inner child: the wounded child, the adapted child, the free child and the creative child, to spot which one most often takes the lead. Designed for anyone interested in reparenting, emotional healing and personal development, it opens a dialogue with the emotions rather than delivering a verdict. It touches on the themes of the inner child, healing and emotions.

This test is about your family — a mother, a father, siblings, a close relative — not about you: you describe the behaviors you observe and what they do to you. It explores that dynamic through five dimensions: detecting toxic family behaviors, their emotional impact on you as an adult, the learned relational patterns, and your capacity for boundaries and distance. It covers the themes of the toxic family, toxic parents and estrangement.

This test explores hidden family loyalties across five dimensions: pattern repetition, family debt, family secrets and the possibility of liberation. It speaks to anyone drawn to transgenerational patterns, psychogenealogy and the repetitions that run silently through the generations, shaping decisions that never felt fully our own. It covers the themes of invisible loyalties, family repetitions and family secrets.

This test assesses the role reversal experienced in childhood across five dimensions: emotional responsibility taken on too early, role reversal, premature maturity and its impact on adult life. It resonates with those who acted as a confidant, mediator or support for a parent, and who now recognize patterns of codependency. It covers the themes of parentification, family roles and premature maturity.

This test assesses the impact of a father's absence, whether physical or emotional, which often leaves a quiet but lasting imprint that resurfaces in unexpected ways during adult life. It covers five dimensions: the nature of the absence, self-esteem and identity, relationships and attachment, anger and repair, and readiness to change. It speaks to both women and men who question the role that absence still plays in their romantic relationships, their sense of worth and their everyday self-confidence. It covers the themes of the absent father, attachment and self-esteem.

This test draws on the adverse childhood experiences (ACE) framework and explores five dimensions: maltreatment, neglect, family dysfunction and the current impact on daily life. Some early experiences leave marks that stay quiet for years, then resurface much later in unexpected ways. It is meant for anyone who wants to take honest stock of their history in order to better understand what still replays today, in a spirit of resilience rather than blame. It covers the themes of trauma, neglect and adverse experiences.

This personal development test reviews self-esteem, self-confidence, emotion regulation, resilience, motivation & values, life balance, relational intelligence, assertiveness, sense & direction, and growth mindset. Ideal at a turning point or a moment of self-questioning, it maps out where you already feel solid and where there is room to grow. The themes covered are personal development and well-being.

This personal development self-assessment explores complementary dimensions: self-esteem, self-confidence, communication, emotional management, resilience, motivation, leadership, life balance, creativity, and spirituality & meaning. It is the broadest evaluation in the catalog, designed for those who want a full overview before deciding what to work on first, whether at a crossroads or simply out of curiosity about themselves. The themes covered are personal development, self-assessment and self-esteem.

This self-confidence test measures assurance across four concrete dimensions: decision-making, personal expression, failure management, and the relationship with the comfort zone. Useful before a presentation, a job interview, a career move, or simply to know yourself better, it shows where confidence stands firm and where it tends to waver under pressure. The themes covered are self-confidence and decision-making.

This work-life balance test assesses the harmony between five spheres: professional, family, health, social, and personal. Valuable during busy stretches, after a vacation, or whenever time feels stretched thin, it helps picture where the imbalance is quietly widening and which spheres, currently neglected, deserve more attention. The themes covered are balance, well-being and working life.

This self-esteem test explores the perception held of one's own worth across five dimensions: personal worth, confidence in one's abilities, body image, and self-assertion. It is for anyone wanting to better understand their inner outlook, which is so often the quiet starting point for many other changes in relationships, work and everyday choices. The themes covered are self-esteem, self-image and self-assertion.

This emotional regulation test assesses four key abilities: emotional identification, emotional expression, emotional regulation, and using emotions to guide decisions. Suited to tense periods as much as a plain wish to understand oneself better, it sheds light on emotional reflexes and the practical skills most worth developing. The themes covered are emotions, emotional intelligence and regulation.

This gifted adult test spots the markers of high intellectual potential (giftedness) across six dimensions: tree-like thinking, emotional intensity, intellectual hunger, sensory over-excitability, and a sense of being out of step. It speaks to anyone wondering about their atypical way of functioning. The themes covered are giftedness and high potential.

This relational intelligence test assesses ease across four complementary areas: active listening, assertive communication, conflict management, and positive influence. Useful for improving both personal and professional relationships, whether as a partner, parent, friend or colleague, it highlights relational strengths and the precise points where communication tends to break down. The themes covered are relational intelligence, communication and relationships.

This personal leadership test assesses the ability to take charge across five dimensions: vision and direction, influence and inspiration, decision-making, and sense of responsibility. It speaks to those who lead a team or a project as much as to anyone simply wanting to take back control of their own choices and direction. The themes covered are leadership, vision and influence.

This motivation and values test explores four complementary dimensions: intrinsic motivation, values alignment, meaning in work, and overall engagement. Valuable during a career rethink, a period of doubt or a wider search for meaning, it helps you spot what genuinely drives you and the quiet gaps between the values you hold and the life you actually lead. The themes covered are motivation, values and meaning.

This psychological resilience test measures the ability to bounce back across five dimensions: adaptation to change, realistic optimism, social support, and search for meaning. Useful in times of hardship, loss or transition, it highlights the concrete resources already available and those worth strengthening. The themes covered are resilience, adaptation and optimism.

This assessment is the most complete in the catalogue on self-control. Across eleven dimensions, it explores explosive anger, behavioral impulsivity, frustration intolerance, irritability, risk-taking, impulsive spending, food impulsivity, delay of gratification, aggressiveness and the functional impact on daily life. It gives the full picture when several forms of impulsivity overlap, before digging into a specific one. Themes: self-control, impulsivity, risk-taking.

This test explores, across five dimensions, the relationship with anger and the sequence it follows: the frequency and intensity of outbursts, the frustration threshold at which it fires, the mode of expression — shouting, hurtful words, gestures, or the opposite, silence and withdrawal — and how long recovery takes afterwards. The report places each of these stages and the point in the sequence where it is still possible to step in. Themes: anger management, impulsivity, aggressiveness.

This test explores the mechanics described for kleptomania: the tension that precedes the act, the relief felt during or after, the non-utilitarian nature of the theft and the loss of control accompanied by guilt. Most thefts reflect no disorder: what is examined here is the tension-act-relief cycle, not the act itself. Themes: impulse control, stealing, DSM-5.

This test explores the mechanics of compulsive buying (oniomania) through five dimensions: the urge and desire to buy, the relief and reward felt, unnecessary purchases and accumulation, and loss of control with its consequences. The report maps the whole cycle and shows where in it the weight gathers. Centered on compulsive buying, shopping addiction, and impulse control.

This test explores the mechanics drawn from the DSM-5 criteria described for pyromania: fascination with fire, the tension that precedes the act, the relief or gratification, and the absence of a utilitarian motive with loss of control. Pyromania is very rare and most deliberate fires reflect no disorder. There is no validated public self-report scale for pyromania; general impulsivity here rests on the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale. Themes: impulse control, fire fascination, DSM-5.

Compatibility is not the absence of differences, but the ability to name them out loud. You each answer alone, on four fronts: the values that steer you, the feeling of being heard, everyday rhythms — sleep, going out, solitude, money — and the life you each picture five years from now. The report lays your two readings over one another and separates what you genuinely share from what you assumed you shared.

How long a couple lasts is poorly predicted by declarations and well predicted by mechanisms, the ones Gottman's research documented: how a disagreement starts and ends, what you do with the hard knocks, how firmly each of you is committed, and the satisfaction felt day to day. You each answer alone. Where your two readings coincide, there is bedrock; where they part — one feels supported, the other feels alone — is where words are needed.

Communication in a couple rests less on the number of words than on how speaking time is really shared, on listening that receives, on how a disagreement gets worked through, and on what is never raised. You each answer alone, out of sight of the other. Set side by side, the two accounts show where you agree about your exchanges — and where one of you believes a subject is open while the other has stopped bringing it up.

Nothing here agrees by itself: what lasts comes out of adjustments, and adjusting assumes each of you knows where they stand. Answering separately, you each place the rhythm and shape of your desire, the gap between what is wished for and what takes place, how easy the subject is to raise, and the satisfaction felt. No norm, no performance measured: the report sets the two readings side by side, mismatches and unsuspected agreements alike.

Opposites do not attract on their own: complementarity is built, maintained, and thrown off. Answering alone, you each place the balance between your temperaments, how the gaps get handled day to day, what you genuinely draw from the other, and the friction that moves things forward rather than wearing them down. The report shows the asymmetry — one and the same difference can cost one of you and feed the other.

One of you comes back to it, the other steps away — and each move keeps the opposite one going, so that neither partner is its author. Answering separately, you each place how strongly you re-open a discussion, how strongly you defer it, the situations that arm the pattern, and how clearly you see it repeat. Brought together, the two accounts describe the cycle as it plays out between you, and the asymmetry in what each of you notices.

How each partner handles closeness, distance and disagreement comes largely from their own relational history, and not from what the other is doing today. Answering for yourself, you each place what dominates in you: quiet trust, anxious watchfulness, the pull back toward independence, or the alternation of the last two. The two profiles are then brought together to show what fits between them and what rubs.

This test explores the relationship with the body in the couple — body image, confidence in nudity, comparison, acceptance — to put words to something often carried in silence.

This test explores exploration itself rather than practices: curiosity as it presents itself, comfort with consent and limits, and how they get talked about with a partner.

This test explores five dimensions of the emotional traces of the past in a relationship — reactivations, projections, disproportionate reactions and the capacity to repair — from the inside of the respondent's own experience.

This test explores listening to the other's desires, reciprocity, intimate communication and shared pleasure — to put words to questions that often stay silent.

This test explores five dimensions of mental load as a couple — task anticipation, perceived division, invisible fatigue and recognition — to name what is being carried day to day without it being seen.

This test explores five dimensions of what remains alive in the relationship — residual intimacy, shared projects, complicity and settled distance — to see clearly where the couple stands.

This test explores five dimensions of intimate trust — anticipatory mistrust, need for control, vulnerability and the weight of past betrayals — drawing on attachment research.

Gottman's research showed that it is not arguments that predict separation, but their quality: contempt, defensiveness, systematic avoidance, progressive emotional distance. This test explores these four warning signals and what they indicate about what is happening in the relationship now.

Gottman's research showed that relationship stability isn't about the absence of conflict, but about the active presence of foundations: curiosity about the partner, a positive-to-negative interaction ratio, mutual admiration, and the ability to repair after friction. This test explores these four pillars and locates where the relationship stands.

This test explores loss of control over sexual behaviors, impact on daily life, escalation, and the distress felt afterwards.

This test explores the dynamic of intimate desire: its frequency, the triggers that set it in motion, the psychological obstacles that hold it back, and the difficulty of talking about it.

This test puts words to what is at stake when a relationship is being questioned, dimension by dimension: day-to-day satisfaction, respect for fundamental needs, the vision of the future and the emotional cost of staying.

This test explores five dimensions of the balance in a relationship — investment, recognition for what is given, accumulated resentment and the relationship with one's own generosity — from the respondent's own inner experience.

This test explores five dimensions: the intensity of feelings, present desire, projection into the future and the place routine has taken, to take stock of what is there today.

This test explores five dimensions of the division of tasks in a relationship — actual division, satisfaction, negotiation and resentment — from the respondent's own perspective.

This test explores the relationship with the intimate imagination: how comfortably it is inhabited, what shame holds back, the wish to share it or keep it, and the curiosity allowed.

This test explores five dimensions of how conflicts get handled in a relationship — conflict style, escalation and de-escalation, repair, frequency and impact — from the respondent's own perspective.

This test explores emotional investment in a third person, concealment, distance from the partner and displaced intimacy, to locate what has moved in the relationship.

This test explores five dimensions of a couple's intimacy after the arrival of a child: the impact of fatigue, the time available for the two of them, the relationship with the body after birth, and what makes reconnection possible.

This test looks at the five love languages identified by Gary Chapman: words of affirmation, acts of service, gifts, quality time and physical touch. It locates the dominant languages, those through which affection is expressed and those through which it is expected.

This test looks at desire in the couple: its level as it is today, the mismatch with the partner, what inhibits it — fatigue, mental load, relationship with the body, routine — and how easy it is to talk about.

This test looks at your love style: self-giving, the need for reciprocity, autonomy within the bond and the expression of affection.

This test looks at emotional functioning as a couple: going through conflict, emotional responsibility, the balance between closeness and autonomy, and non-reactive communication.

**This test is about your partner, not about you.** It looks at five dimensions of observable behavioral signals: unusual changes in behavior, growing digital secrecy, gradual intimate distancing, inconsistencies in accounts. The questions are framed from what is observed and felt; the report sets those observations in order: what has changed, since when, and whether the pattern holds together.

This test looks at the way sexuality is talked about in the couple: how comfortably desires are expressed, how the partner's are listened to, how needs are negotiated, and which subjects have stayed silent.

This test looks at the mechanisms that can make emotional closeness difficult: avoiding vulnerability, controlling distance, fear of fusion, sabotaging bonds.

This test looks at your relationship with commitment in love: avoidance of future projection, the ambivalence between desire and fear, avoidance behaviors, and the need for freedom.

This test looks at the couple's life plans: the values that guide choices, the shared direction over several years, the place of children and family, and where to live.

This test looks at feelings for a partner that have become unclear or hard to name: their clarity, the weight of outside expectations, the room left for exploration, and the judgment passed on oneself.

This test looks at the questioning of sexual orientation: the clarity of attractions, the willingness to explore them, outside pressures, and the way one sees oneself.

**This test is about your partner's behavior, not your own.** It covers concrete behaviors across four areas — respect for your limits, communication, control and isolation, and consistency between words and actions. It puts words, area by area, to what you are already observing in the relationship.

This test looks at your love style, between emotional intensity and stability: how much room vivid emotion takes up, the need for predictability, the way love is expressed, and the rhythm that suits.

This test looks at five dimensions of sexual satisfaction in a couple: the gap between the frequency lived and the frequency wanted, the quality of the pleasure experienced, the freedom to talk about it within the relationship, and the desires for change.

This test looks at five dimensions of sex appeal as it is lived: body confidence, body language, assurance in flirtation, and how much room other people's gaze takes up.

How many repetitions an instruction takes, the need to move at the exact moments when sitting still is required, answers thrown out before the question ends, and how all of it plays out in class and in the playground: the report orders what you observe day to day. A diagnosis belongs to a professional assessment; what you take away is a precise account to bring to one.

Some worries pass through; others settle in and take up room. Gathering what you observe of your teen — the fears that keep returning, what is quietly being avoided, what the body expresses in their place, and the cost at school and among friends — the report sets these four alongside one another, so you can see which has grown most and what it has already started to touch.

No single sign settles the matter, and that is precisely what makes this age so hard to read. Mood and whatever has stopped giving pleasure, withdrawal from family as much as from friends, recent changes in sleep, appetite, results or appearance, and the signals that call for vigilance: the report places your observations side by side, so you can see whether they accumulate.

Speed of understanding, the intensity of emotional and sensory reactions, the gap felt with children of the same age, an appetite for learning that never lets up: taken separately, each explains little. The report shows how they combine in your child. High potential itself is established by a psychometric assessment such as the WISC; what you get here is an ordered picture of what you already see.

A child can think well of themselves and fall apart at a piece of teasing; the reverse exists too. What your child thinks of themselves outside their results, their capacity to recover after a criticism, their independence in deciding and saying no, and the sense of holding a place among their own: the report keeps these four apart instead of folding them into one verdict.

A child who is being bullied rarely brings it up themselves. Mood around school days, friendships that have quietly shifted, a growing reluctance to go, damaged belongings or unexplained marks: taken one at a time, each of these says very little. The report brings your observations together and shows whether they converge, because convergence is what counts, never a single sign.

Two children with the same daily total do not live the same thing, which is why counting minutes settles nothing. The room screens actually take up in a day, how long falling asleep takes and the quality of the rest, concentration and schoolwork, and what happens at the moment of switching off: the report shows what the screens have displaced, and what has held.

High sensitivity is a way of functioning, not a disorder: roughly one person in five perceives their environment more intensely than average. Reactivity to noise, light and texture; the emotions of others absorbed as though they were their own; being swamped by their own; and the quiet time needed afterwards. The report shows what saturates the most across an ordinary day.

Effects vary enormously from one teen to the next, which makes time spent a poor indicator on its own. How much of the day social media takes up, the constant measuring against lives staged for display, what remains of it in the picture your teen holds of themselves, and the content or exchanges that have made them uncomfortable: the report situates each of the four separately.

Believing in your own abilities, speaking up in front of others, starting again after a failed attempt and standing comparison with classmates are four separate things: a child can be solid on one and fragile on the next. From what you observe day to day, the report keeps them apart rather than merging them, and shows which support your child's confidence already rests on.

The word lazy covers four very different things. Curiosity about what is being taught, effort sustained regardless of the results it brings, the ability to get organized without an adult sitting alongside, and the meaning school still holds in your child's eyes: the report separates these drivers and shows which one has gone out. Motivation shifts with subjects, teachers and terms.

Naming a feeling, coming back down when it runs high, saying it rather than being subjected to it, and doing something with anger: these four do not arrive together, and a child can name very well while having no idea how to calm down. Regulating is learned slowly, with the adults nearby. From what you notice, the report shows which step is still missing today.

The hours matter far less than what they have quietly pushed aside. From what you observe — sleep, meals, homework, the reaction when the device is out of reach, and whether online exchanges are replacing face-to-face ones — the report shows where the use really spills over. Heavy use is not the same thing as addiction, and reading the two apart is what keeps the conversation open.

Food consoles, occupies and reassures, at every age. From what you see around the table, the report separates the moments when a feeling arrives before hunger, the atmosphere of the meal itself, the welcome or the refusal of new textures, and the pleasure that still remains. You come away knowing which of these four is carrying the difficulty, and which one is holding steady.

A child can know the material perfectly and still freeze the moment it is graded. From your observations, the report separates the failure imagined the night before, what locks up under the teacher's eye, the occasions now quietly steered around, and what marks do to the picture your child holds of themselves. Academic level explains none of it, and the report says which of the four weighs most.

When a child learns, remembers or organizes themselves differently from others their age, the useful question is where exactly it stops flowing. Reading and written output, span of attention, the way information is retained, movement and coordination: the report names the area concerned from what you see at home, so that any conversation with school or a professional starts from something precise.

A reserved child is not socially clumsy, and a sociable one may still struggle to keep a friendship alive. Described here as actions rather than as temperament — approaching others, making a bond last, cooperating and sharing, getting through a disagreement without breaking it — the report shows which of the four your child already manages easily, and which one is worth supporting now.

Ways of speaking to one another are built by several people, over years. From what you observe at home — how far you really listen, what can be said there about feelings, what happens once a disagreement opens, and what holds the bond together on ordinary days — the report brings out the habits that repeat. No single member is their origin, and nothing here assigns a fault.

No family lives without conflict: several rhythms and several sets of needs share one roof. What differs from one home to another is the way tension climbs, then comes back down, or does not. From your answers, the report describes the triggers that recur, the shape the escalation takes, what you do afterwards to find each other again, and the trace it leaves in the bonds.

Invention does not take the same route from one child to another. Unexpected associations, the urge to make something and see it through, the pull of what they do not yet know, the richness of the games they invent: the report shows which of these routes is already your child's, and which is simply not their way. Knowing that tells you where to feed the spark rather than force it.

Disengagement is rarely a matter of the pupil alone. Involvement in schoolwork, the behaviors that move a child away from school itself, the meaning they still find in what they do there, the place they keep among classmates: the report follows each of these four slopes from your observations and shows which one started first, which is usually where any support has to begin.

Worry about the state of the world is not a symptom: it answers a documented reality. What matters is how your teen carries it. From what you observe — what they know and where they read it, the intensity of what they express, how much of their days and nights it occupies, and what they already lean on — the report shows what separates an awareness that sets someone moving from a fear that stops them.

Getting started, holding something in mind while doing something else, holding back a reaction, changing method when the first one fails: these are what organize action, and they have nothing to do with how bright a child is. From ordinary scenes at home — the forgotten schoolbag, the instruction given three times, the homework begun and abandoned — the report shows which of the four is lagging.

An impulsive child usually knows, seconds afterwards, exactly what should have been done: the brake arrives late, it is not missing. Acting before the consequences are weighed, holding out through waiting, reactions that go off all at once, risks taken without being assessed — the report situates each and shows which brake would gain the most from being supported first.

An inattentive child can hold on for hours to whatever absorbs them, and that contrast is exactly what throws the adults around them. Sustaining effort to the end of a task, filtering out what pulls away, the forgetting and the lost belongings, carrying an instruction through: these four look alike but call for different adjustments. The report shows which one dominates right now.

Recognizing what is felt on both sides, expressing it so that it gets through, stepping into someone else's place, and drawing on an emotion when a situation gets complicated: four skills that grow at their own pace, independently of age and temperament. From what you pick up day to day, the report describes where each one stands today, a current state and never an aptitude fixed for life.

Hours played tell you very little on their own; what has shifted around them tells you a great deal. Sleep and the rhythm of the days, homework and concentration, ties to family and to friends, and how frustration is handled the moment the controller goes down: the report tells a heavy use with no repercussions apart from a moderate one that spills over everywhere. No moral threshold is set.

A rule almost never collapses on all its supports at once: one of them gives way. How clear the demand is and how well everyone knows it, how regularly it holds including on tired evenings, what happens when your child insists, cries or negotiates, and whether the rules still fit their actual age. The report shows which support is the weak one. A limit protects and structures; it does not punish.

The line between opposition and ordinary self-assertion is hard to place, and no single behavior draws it. How an instruction is received, how intense and how long the outbursts run, the challenging of every boundary — even one that suits them — and what happens when a refusal or the unexpected comes up: the report situates each of these and shows how they combine in your child.

The pressure a child feels rarely matches the pressure a parent believes they are applying, and that gap is the useful part. The level of what you expect, your reaction when results fall short, what your child appears to feel about it, and the room left for them to love things that serve no purpose: the report situates these four, and above all the distance between the last two.

Protective parenting has a balance point, and it moves as the child grows. What you check and how often, the risk scenarios that unfold on their own, what you do when your child stumbles, and the decisions that genuinely belong to them, mistakes included: the report situates each of these without ranking you as a parent. Its subject is the freedom given, never the love given.

Perfectionism comes in two forms: one carries a child forward, the other wears them down. Very high standards set alone, fear of mistakes that stops work from ever starting, difficulty treating anything as finished, and the need to proceed in one way only — the report shows which of these four weighs most on your child, and whether the demand is still serving them.

Resilience is not a temperament received at birth but a set of supports that get built. How your child comes through a hard time, the support they perceive around them — a different thing from the support actually given — their flexibility in seeing a situation another way, and their persistence when something resists: the report shows which support is already solid.

Some thoughts turn without ever moving forward. Returning to a painful scene long after it has passed, the same worry going round in circles, the difficulty in letting go of an argument or a failure, and what all of it costs in sleep and in class: the report situates each of these from what you observe, and shows where the loop is doing the most damage.

Separation difficulties appear in infancy, often resurface around six or eight, and ease as confidence grows, which makes intensity and duration the useful measures rather than the fact itself. The distress at the moment of parting, everything arranged beforehand to avoid it, the stomach aches once a medical cause is ruled out, and the real cost at school and at night: the report situates each.

Written language is where the effort shows first at home. How long decoding takes and what is left of the meaning afterwards, the state of spelling and copied work, the recurring confusions between close letters and sounds, and the tiredness and the detours used to escape writing: the report gathers what you observe, so a conversation with school starts from something precise.

There is no ideal number of hours that holds for every child, which makes the count almost useless on its own. How regular the timings are and how the evening ritual unfolds, how long falling asleep actually takes and how much adult presence it needs, what the night becomes, and the state of the following day: the report situates each of these from facts you can date.

School pressure can come from your child or from what surrounds them, and the two are not eased in the same way. How much room marks and comparisons take up, the volume of work and the pace of the week, the tension around assessments, and the toll taken on sleep: the report shows where the pressure originates, and therefore what can realistically be lightened.

Authoritarian, permissive, democratic: not a ranking, but coherent logics, each on its own terms. The structure you set and hold, the flexibility with which you adjust to the situation and to the child, the warmth of the bond day to day, and what gets said when voices rise. From your answers, the report describes the pattern that emerges and where structure and connection currently sit.

Shyness is a way of approaching the social world — slower at the start, often solid afterwards — and it is not a fault to be corrected. Withdrawal in groups, the time needed with an unfamiliar person or place, the ease of saying what they think in front of others, the physical signs before an exposed moment: the report also shows the pace at which your child is already moving on their own.

This test separates four supports of desire at menopause: spontaneous desire, the state of the body, mental availability and responsive desire. The report names the one that has moved.

This test explores physical comfort, self-image in intimacy, the expression of needs and the adjustments already found during menopause.

This test explores four facets of self-esteem at menopause: the relationship with a changing body, the sense of being oneself, personal worth and the social gaze on age.

This test takes stock of the supports available before menopause: knowledge, what has already been anticipated, the way this stage is approached and the network of resources identified.

This test explores mood stability, underlying serenity, the meaning given to this stage and the resources for regulation during menopause.

This test explores closeness, the climate when tension rises, perceived support and everyday readjustments at menopause.

This test examines four levers of comfort in perimenopause — taking care of yourself, coping with the signs, inner supports and access to support — from the angle of ACCESS rather than effort.

This test puts in order what has shifted in the emotional experience and since when, whether the link with perimenopause is made or not, the bearings that still hold and the effect on relationships.

This test covers the relationship rather than the body: feeling understood without having to prove anything, the climate the unexplained installs, what still manages to be said, and the arrangements found together in uncertainty.

This test gathers the signs that prove nothing on their own: the physical signs, the changes in the cycle, the movements of mood and the place all of it takes in a day.