An in-depth assessment to better understand your strengths, the areas that deserve your attention, and how the different dimensions of your profile relate to one another.
This assessment explores 5 dimensions
Intensity and priority given to the phone · Impact on sleep and the body · Withdrawal and irritability · Social withdrawal and avoidance · Your relationship to this topic
Your report doesn't stop at separate scores. It also highlights the contrasts and connections between your results to offer a more personal reading of your profile.
Hello Emma,
Your teenager's overall relationship with their phone, as you describe it, falls in the moderate range - a signal that there are areas worth tending to, but also solid ground to stand on. The most encouraging findings are the low intensity of phone use and the absence of distress when separated from the device; these suggest that your child is not psychologically dependent on the phone, which is a protective factor not all adolescents enjoy. At the same time, you have noticed that phone habits are cutting into sleep and recovery, and that face-to-face social contact seems to be fading in favor of digital interaction. These two observations often go hand in hand: late-night online engagement delays bedtime, fatigue reduces the motivation to see friends in person, and more screen time fills the gap - a cycle that, left unaddressed, can gradually deepen. Your own feelings of hesitation about tackling this topic are understandable; many parents at your stage of life juggle multiple demands and can find tech conversations exhausting. Nevertheless, the data suggests that because your teenager's emotional anchor is not the phone, practical, low-key adjustments - like a bedtime phone curfew or shared offline activities - are likely to be well received. This report does not replace a professional assessment, but it can serve as a conversation starter with your teenager and, if needed, with a school counselor or pediatrician. The most important thing to remember is that you have already taken an active step just by reflecting on these results, and that small, consistent changes often yield the deepest impact.
The significant toll on your sleep and pronounced social avoidance, especially when seen through the lens of a dorsal/freeze state, suggests your phone may be operating as a numbing shelter from face-to-face stress that triggers all-or-nothing fears or catastrophic thoughts. At the same time, your moderate overall reliance and discreet withdrawal hint that this isn’t a fixed addiction but a coping pattern you can reshape—replacing the phone with small, manageable real-world connections could gradually restore rest and reduce avoidance. You hold more agency than it currently feels, and beginning with even one phone-free hour before bed might break the cycle of escape and signal to your nervous system that safety can be found offline, too.
Overall result
Some signs reportedYour answers (37%) reveal some signs, without a systematic pattern.
Some signs reported
3 dimensions to strengthen, 2 strengths
5 dimensions · Personalized report
Open the different sections to discover how the same profile can be analysed from several angles. Your own report will follow this same logic, built from your own answers.
Phone use remains within typical proportions for a teenager of this age.
Your teenager's score on giving priority to the phone is low, which suggests that, for them, the device does not yet occupy an outsized place in daily life. In itself, this is a protective factor because it means they likely still have other interests that compete for their attention. However, since you also notice some effects on sleep and social withdrawal, it is possible that even moderate use, when it occurs in the evening or replaces face-to-face moments, can leave a mark.
This pattern sometimes points to a situation where the phone is not an addiction but a convenient escape - something you might gently explore. You could, for instance, observe whether their screen time spikes just before bed or during family meals. Because this dimension is a clear strength, it gives you a solid foundation to build on for other areas.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
The phone regularly affects your teenager's sleep and recovery. Evening boundaries can make a real difference.
Although your teenager does not seem overly attached to their phone, you observe that it does cut into their sleep and physical recovery. A score in this range often means that the device is used too close to bedtime or even in bed, which can interfere with the natural wind-down that the brain needs. Because sleep directly shapes mood, concentration, and growth, this is worth approaching as a health priority rather than a disciplinary one.
When the impact on sleep is present without high overall phone attachment, one explanation is that the habit has become automatic - your teenager may not even realize they are staying up later than intended. You could test this by checking whether they often feel tired in the morning, or if they mention having trouble falling asleep. The link with social withdrawal also raises the possibility that online chats or gaming are nudging bedtime later, a common and reversible pattern.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
Your teenager manages time without their phone well, without disproportionate reactions.
Your results paint a reassuring picture on this dimension: your teenager manages phone-free time with calm, without the irritation or distress that can surface in more problematic patterns. This means that, for them, the phone is not a prosthesis they cannot be without - a real asset that separates habit from dependence. Because the emotional cost of separation is low, any adjustments you introduce are unlikely to be met with strong resistance, which is a gift for your family.
Still, it is worth connecting this to the social withdrawal score: perhaps your teenager uses the phone to fill quiet moments that otherwise might feel empty, rather than to avoid unbearable states. Strengthening alternative sources of reward, like a hobby they enjoy or a small project together, can maintain this healthy detachment.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
Digital life is progressively taking over face-to-face relationships. Exploring what lies behind this can be useful.
The score that stands out most is social withdrawal and avoidance. Even though your teenager's overall phone use is not excessive, it seems that the time they do spend online is gradually replacing in-person connections. You might be observing that they prefer texting over meeting, or that they retreat to their room with their phone instead of joining family or friends. Sometimes this reflects a temperament that finds digital communication safer - there are no awkward pauses, and one can edit replies.
Another possibility is that real-life social demands feel tiring for your teenager right now, and the phone provides a convenient shelter. Because their emotional tolerance for being without the phone is still good, this is less about addiction and more about comfort-seeking, which you can redirect with care. You might test the waters by asking curious questions rather than making demands: 'What do you like about chatting on your phone versus hanging out in person?' This can open a door without cornering them.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
Your openness to exploring your teenager's phone use with them.
This dimension reflects your own relationship to the topic of your teenager's phone use. Scoring low here suggests that, right now, you may not feel particularly ready or motivated to actively explore this issue with them. Perhaps the topic feels uncomfortable, you are unsure where to start, or you simply have other priorities that take precedence. That is completely normal - many parents hesitate to open a conversation that could turn into a power struggle.
At the same time, noticing this is the first step toward change, and the fact that you completed this questionnaire indicates there is at least a spark of curiosity. Given that your teenager's scores show some areas of strain (sleep, social life) but also real strengths (low emotional dependence), the path forward does not require a drastic intervention; small, gentle moves can make a difference. Starting with your own digital habits can be a powerful, non-threatening model.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
The profile reveals a meaningful interplay among the dimensions. While 'Intensity and priority' is low and 'Withdrawal and irritability' is low - suggesting a benign attachment to the phone - the moderate scores on 'Impact on sleep' and 'Social withdrawal' appear to reinforce each other. For instance, using the phone late at night likely delays sleep, and sleep deprivation can make real-world social encounters feel more draining, pushing your teenager further into the comfort of digital communication.
Because your teenager does not exhibit strong emotional reactivity when off the phone, this loop may be driven more by habit and convenience than by compulsion, which is good news: habit loops are often easier to reshape. Your own low 'Motivation to change' may unintentionally keep the pattern in place, not out of neglect, but perhaps because the situation has not yet reached a crisis point. Connecting this insight to your own readiness can help: even a single small change, initiated by you, could interrupt the cycle and reveal your teenager's ability to adapt, which in turn might boost your confidence to explore further.
Right now
In the coming weeks
In the long run
These are hypotheses, not conclusions. You are the one who knows whether they resonate with your experience.
Recognised clinical frameworks applied to your profile, as additional perspectives to weigh.
Nervous system state — Dorsal/Freeze
Cognitive pattern — Avoidance/Escape
Cognitive pattern — Catastrophizing
Cognitive pattern — All-or-Nothing Thinking
Cognitive distortions — Sources: Beck (1976) ; Burns (1980)
Polyvagal theory — Sources: Porges (2011) ; Dana (2018) — proposed/debated theory
Addictions and dependencies
Biopsychosocial Model (Griffiths)
Sources: Griffiths (2005)
Relapse Prevention (Marlatt)
Sources: Marlatt & Gordon (1985)
Operant conditioning
Sources: Skinner (1953)
Cross-cutting frameworks
Emotion regulation
Sources: Gross (1998) ; Gross (2015)
Cognitive distortions
Sources: Beck (1976) ; Burns (1980)
Young’s Early Maladaptive Schemas
Sources: Young, Klosko & Weishaar (2003) ; Young (1990)
Ellis’s ABC Model
Sources: Ellis (1962) ; Ellis & Harper (1975)
Mindfulness
Sources: Kabat-Zinn (1990) ; Segal, Williams & Teasdale (2002)
Polyvagal theory
Sources: Porges (2011) ; Dana (2018) — proposed/debated theory
These frameworks do not constitute a medical diagnosis.
Looking at your teenager’s relationship with their phone, what emerges is less a story of dependency and more a quiet drift—a drift where the screen has become a comfortable retreat from the messier, more demanding world of face-to-face connection. The most striking tension in this portrait is that your child’s attachment to their device is not driven by compulsion: they don’t show intense craving for the phone, and when it’s out of reach, they don’t unravel. That’s a remarkable and often overlooked asset. Yet, at the same time, the phone is deeply entangled with two areas that are clearly suffering: sleep and real-world social life. This suggests the phone might be less a craving and more a coping tool—a place to go when the energy or confidence required for in-person interaction feels too high, or when the night-time quiet makes it easy to slip into a digital world that demands less and offers a soothing, controllable rhythm.
From this perspective, the social withdrawal you’re noticing—which your responses place at a pronounced level—could be the focal point that organizes the rest of the picture. It isn’t necessarily that the phone is causing the withdrawal; rather, the phone may have become the primary stage for social life because it simplifies connection. Your teenager might be navigating a period where real-world interactions feel particularly challenging, draining, or unrewarding, and the screen provides a buffer. The cost, however, is that sleep gets sacrificed to late-night scrolling or messaging, and then fatigue amplifies the very thing that drives the retreat: who has the motivation to plan an in-person meetup when they’re running on a sleep deficit? The cycle can tighten—less sleep, less in-person contact, more screen time to fill the gap—but crucially, your child doesn’t seem psychologically hooked; they seem, instead, to have developed a set of habits that serve an understandable purpose right now.
Your own hesitation about tackling this topic is entirely normal and, read generously, might be a sign of something wise: a recognition that heavy-handed restriction without collaboration could backfire or harm your relationship. The fact that you rated your comfort with addressing the phone issue as low isn’t necessarily a limitation—it could be a reflection of your respect for your teenager’s autonomy, or a sense that the usual scripts about “phone addiction” don’t quite fit. This is an underappreciated resource in your situation. Because your child isn’t displaying the friction of withdrawal or the frantic priority many parents battle, you have space to introduce changes not as sanctions but as experiments in shared wellbeing. The low intensity of phone use suggests that the device isn’t the emotional center of their world—it’s a tool, a habit, a place to rest, but not a lifeline. That means practical adjustments can land differently than they would for a teen in full psychological dependence.
What might a plausible backstory be for this equilibrium? It’s possible that your teenager encountered a period—maybe during early adolescence or a transitional moment—when in-person social groups felt overwhelming, exclusive, or exhausting. The phone offered a predictable, less vulnerable way to stay connected without navigating the real-time demands of body language, tone, and spontaneous interaction. Over time, that path became more traveled, and the original awkwardness or discomfort that prompted it may have faded from view, leaving behind just the habit. Your child may not even frame it as avoidance; they might simply describe it as preferring to chat online or losing track of time. And because they don’t get irritable when the phone is removed, the habit can fly under the radar, seeming benign—until you look at the sleep data and the declining real-world contact. That’s where the real cost shows up: not in crisis, but in missed restoration and possibly narrowing social comfort zones.
Given all this, what might shift first? The most accessible lever is probably sleep hygiene around the phone, precisely because it’s a practical, bodily domain rather than a direct confrontation about social life. A small experiment—a bedtime phone curfew or a “phone parking spot” outside the bedroom—could be framed as a gentle pilot test: “Let’s see if this helps you feel more rested for a couple of weeks.” The beauty is that your teenager’s low attachment intensity means they may resist the idea but not experience deep distress once the phone is put away. The concrete sign that change is stirring would not be a grand declaration; it might be something like your teenager mentioning, offhand, that they slept better, or initiating an in-person plan on their own after a few days of better rest. That tiny spark—self-initiated real-world contact—would indicate that the cycle is loosening, and that their own internal compass is steering toward a healthier balance, with you as the thoughtful, non-judgmental witness rather than the enforcer.
A score is not lived as a number but as a scene. See if you recognise yours — or set it aside.
Intensity and priority given to the phone
Impact on sleep and the body
Withdrawal and irritability
Social withdrawal and avoidance
Your relationship to this topic
To write about on your own, or to bring to a professional.
To help you situate this report, here are the references specific to this test.
1. My teenager leaves their phone aside during meals.
Answer : Somewhat agree
You answered "Somewhat agree". Can you tell me more about when this comes up for you?
It mainly shows up in situations that matter to me, when I feel under pressure or emotionally involved.
2. My teenager sleeps through the night without getting up to check their phone.
Answer : Neither agree nor disagree
And how long have you noticed this?
It has been more present over the past few months, though I recognise it from before too.
3. My teenager has lied about what they were doing on their phone.
Answer : Somewhat disagree
4. My teenager stays in the shared rooms rather than shutting themselves away with their phone.
Answer : Neither agree nor disagree
5. My teenager limits their own screen time without difficulty.
Answer : Somewhat agree
6. My teenager uses their phone late at night, once in bed.
Answer : Neither agree nor disagree
The example shown on this page illustrates the format and level of detail of the report. Your own analysis will be different, because it will be built from your own answers.
What is interesting is not just your score on each dimension. Your report also seeks to identify the contrasts and interactions between your results: a strong resource that offsets a fragility, a dimension that seems to play a central role, or a gap between several aspects of how you function.
This is the personalized reading that the example cannot give you.
Answer the assessment questions and get your personalized report.
Detailed report · 5 dimensions · Personalized analysis
€2.90
Your profile won't be Emma's. It will be built from your own answers.
← Back to the test page