Skip to main content
Psy AssistantScanMyLove
Back to the test
📄 Sample couple's report — illustrative fictional couple (Emma & Noah). Your real report is built from YOUR two sets of answers.
COMPARATIVE REPORT — TESTS FOR TWO

Your comparative report

Complementary personalities — two profiles, one test, taken independently

Emma & Noah

WHAT YOUR TWO ANSWERS REVEAL

What you couldn't have known about each other

Emma 88% · Noah 67% — Managing differences day to day

On your managing differences day to day, Emma scores 88%, Noah scores 67%. This 21-point gap doesn't show up in an ordinary conversation — it's exactly the kind of mismatch that, left unspoken, feeds recurring tension neither of you can quite explain.

What this changes, concretely

Because Emma perceives your managing differences day to day much more positively than Noah, one simple rule changes things: next time the topic comes up, each of you names your own felt score ("for me it's high" / "for me it's low") before discussing it. The gap becomes a topic — not an unspoken thing that keeps building up.

Overview

Overall convergence score

91%

Vos perceptions sont très proches

Dimension-by-dimension analysis

For each dimension of the test, here is how your answers compare — and what this gap (or closeness) may mean for the two of you.

Personality balance3 pts

Emma 83% · Noah 80%

On your personality balance, your answers converge clearly (a 3-point gap). This is a shared way of seeing things — a solid foundation to build on.

Managing differences day to day21 pts

Emma 88% · Noah 67%

On your managing differences day to day, your answers diverge clearly (21 points) — this is exactly the kind of mismatch that, left unspoken, can feed recurring misunderstandings. This isn't proof of incompatibility: it's an invitation to talk about it, each of you holding a perception that is equally valid.

Mutual contribution and enrichment9 pts

Emma 63% · Noah 72%

On your mutual contribution and enrichment, a nuance (9 points) separates your answers — subtle enough that it's unlikely to cause friction, but real. It's worth naming, if only to know each other better on this point.

Constructive friction5 pts

Emma 78% · Noah 73%

On your constructive friction, your answers converge clearly (a 5-point gap). This is a shared way of seeing things — a solid foundation to build on.

Readiness for change

This score is personal to each respondent — it is never averaged or directly compared, since one person's readiness for change says nothing about the other's.

Emma

75%

High readiness for change

Noah

56%

Emerging readiness

Talking about it together

This report isn't a conclusion — it's a starting point. Here are a few prompts to open the conversation, without pressure and without trying to "win":

  • What do you think explains the 21-point gap on your managing differences day to day?
  • On your mutual contribution and enrichment, what had you never said out loud before this report?
  • Beyond the gaps above, what surprised you in the other person's answers?

This report compares two perceptions — neither is "the truth". There is simply yours and your partner's, and the gap between them is what's worth exploring together.

This report was generated automatically from your answers to an online questionnaire. It draws on recognized psychological models but does not constitute a medical or psychological diagnosis, nor couples therapy. For support, consult a mental health professional or a couples therapist.

Get YOUR Complementary personalities couple's report

Each of you answers independently — for free. Then unlock your comparative report for €1.99, for both of you.

← Back to the test page

Join our exchange group

A caring, application-based space for exchange on WhatsApp — not therapy.

Join the Community (waiting list)

A doubt about a real relationship?

Decode your actual conversation, message by message.

Analyze →