An in-depth assessment to better understand your strengths, the areas that deserve your attention, and how the different dimensions of your profile relate to one another.
This assessment explores 6 dimensions
How you yourself explain what makes this relationship with your manager hard · Quality of the reporting relationship · How power and control are used · Team climate and psychological safety · The toll on you · Readiness to change
Your report doesn't stop at separate scores. It also highlights the contrasts and connections between your results to offer a more personal reading of your profile.
Hello Emma,
Your answers reveal some moderate signals. Without dramatizing, these elements can be observed and discussed with a trusted person. A moderate situation is not a trivial one: it describes very real difficulties, simply not yet overwhelming.
It is often at this stage that it is easiest to act, before things settle in for good. Briefly noting the moments when the situation weighs more — when, with whom, in what context — helps you see clearly and makes the conversation easier, whether with a loved one or a professional.
Overall result
Occasional signalsYour answers describe problematic behavior that is present but episodic: gaps in the relationship, friction in how authority is used, speech partly constrained within the team. This profile is the hardest to read, because it fits a clumsy or overloaded manager just as well as the beginning of a slide. Two things settle it with time: repetition, and whether the behavior is aimed at the whole team or at certain people in particular. Watching those two points over a few weeks tells you more than any immediate interpretation.
And if what you are going through is happening at work, ScanMyJob goes back through your work conversations — messages, email threads — and turns them into a dated, exportable record of facts. It qualifies nothing: it dates and it counts.
Occasional signals
2 dimensions to strengthen, 4 strengths
6 dimensions · Personalized report
Open the different sections to discover how the same profile can be analysed from several angles. Your own report will follow this same logic, built from your own answers.
How you account for what makes this relationship with your manager hard, before the test tells you anything at all. This section measures no difficulty and produces no level: it records a starting reading. None of the answers offered is more correct than another, and the number attached to this section carries no particular meaning. Your answer is taken up and discussed in the section of the report devoted to you.
Your answers for how you yourself explain what makes this relationship with your manager hard do not indicate that this dimension is a central point of the situation you currently describe. This may mean that the situation does not particularly engage this facet, or that it has remained stable on this point.
This is not a detail, however: knowing where the situation does not weigh helps you better pinpoint where it does, and therefore focus your attention in the right place. This observation is useful to keep as a benchmark: if the situation evolves, comparing it to future answers will help measure its meaning and direction. A dimension that is stable today may stay that way, or shift if the context changes — hence the value of not losing sight of it.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
Your answers describe a reporting relationship that broadly works: expectations are legible, feedback happens, commitments are kept, and what you put forward finds a place. Research on leader-member exchange distinguishes high-quality relationships — shared information, reciprocity, backing — from relationships reduced to the bare contract. Your answers place yours on the first side. That matters for reading the rest of your results: a legible relationship is a resource that absorbs occasional friction, including when other parts of the job deteriorate.
On quality of the reporting relationship, this level calls for the same reading as detailed above for another dimension of the same intensity (see the analysis above).
Recommendations and concrete exercises
Your answers describe no coercive behavior: no public dressing-down, no threats, no disproportionate oversight, no openly unequal treatment. In the classic typology of social power bases, authority can rest on coercion, but also on recognized expertise, the legitimacy of the role, or the quality of the relationship. Your answers place the authority you observe on those latter footings. That is a favorable finding, and not a minor one: coercive behavior is what most sharply separates a difficult manager from a harmful one.
On how power and control are used, this level calls for the same reading as detailed above for another dimension of the same intensity (see the analysis above).
Recommendations and concrete exercises
Your answers describe a climate where caution has become the rule: disagreements go unsaid, mistakes are hidden, initiative is risky, people protect themselves by putting things in writing, and the mood follows the manager's. This degree of deterioration goes beyond one relationship: it concerns the whole group, which makes it harder to dispute than a personal impression. The objective signs you report — frequent departures, more sick leave — are the ones research most regularly ties to failing management.
Your answers for team climate and psychological safety highlight significant signals. Your feelings are legitimate: these answers describe a situation you are currently going through, not a trait that would define you. This is an important distinction: a situation changes when the context changes or when you act on it, whereas a trait would give the impression of being "just how you are" with no way out.
You are not the problem; you are facing a situation that is. At this level, it can become difficult to keep a clear view of the situation from within; the outside perspective of a trusted person, a professional, or a helpline can help gain perspective. If several dimensions are simultaneously elevated, this reinforces the need for external support — it is not a failure, it is a normal logic of the situation.
Recommendations and concrete exercises
Your answers describe no notable toll on you: your sleep, your confidence and your working relationships do not appear to be affected by this reporting relationship. That is essential for reading the rest of your results, because the same management behavior does not have the same effect on everyone, depending on the person, the support available and how long the situation has lasted. Difficulties can exist elsewhere without reaching you personally — which takes nothing away from how real they are, but changes what to deal with first.
On the toll on you, this level calls for the same reading as detailed above for another dimension of the same intensity (see the analysis above).
Recommendations and concrete exercises
These questions measure your readiness to change. Your score suggests you are not yet fully convinced of the need to evolve — a valid stage of the process. Awareness always comes before decision. Your report helps clarify what is at stake.
On readiness to change, this level calls for the same reading as detailed above for another dimension of the same intensity (see the analysis above).
Recommendations and concrete exercises
Your profile shows clear relief without several dimensions rising together: Team climate and psychological safety stands out, 50 points above The toll on you, while the others remain more measured.
This reads differently from a picture where several dimensions reinforce one another: here, what is at play seems concentrated rather than diffuse. That is often more tractable — an identified point is easier to work on than a tangled whole — provided it is not treated in isolation: even concentrated, it rests on the rest of how you function.
Right now
In the coming weeks
In the long run
Support resources
If you are struggling, you are not alone.
This report supports self-knowledge and does not replace a consultation with a psychologist or doctor.
1. In your view, what makes this relationship with your manager hard comes mainly from:
Answer : The pressure they are under from their own management.
You answered "The pressure they are under from their own management.". Can you tell me more about when this comes up for you?
It mainly shows up in situations that matter to me, when I feel under pressure or emotionally involved.
2. My manager gives me clear feedback on my work.
Answer : Often
And how long have you noticed this?
It has been more present over the past few months, though I recognise it from before too.
3. Exactly what my manager expects of me stays unclear to me.
Answer : Sometimes
4. The information I need to do my job reaches me late.
Answer : Sometimes
5. In front of their own management, my manager leaves the team's work undefended.
Answer : Sometimes
6. I can raise a work problem with them without fearing I'll be judged for it.
Answer : Often
The example shown on this page illustrates the format and level of detail of the report. Your own analysis will be different, because it will be built from your own answers.
What is interesting is not just your score on each dimension. Your report also seeks to identify the contrasts and interactions between your results: a strong resource that offsets a fragility, a dimension that seems to play a central role, or a gap between several aspects of how you function.
This is the personalized reading that the example cannot give you.
Answer the assessment questions and get your personalized report.
Detailed report · 6 dimensions · Personalized analysis
€2.90
Your profile won't be Emma's. It will be built from your own answers.
← Back to the test page