Work psychology applied to your real conversations
Your work conversations, turned into a dated record of facts.
Upload your WhatsApp, Slack or Teams conversations, or an email thread. ScanMyJob analyses them with the tools of work psychology and produces a clear report — including a dated, sourced, exportable record of facts.
Analyse my work conversationsFull report — €8.00, one-off payment.
No account needed. The amount is converted into your currency at checkout.
Why are you here?
Eight reasons bring people here, and they do not call for the same report. Find yours: it is what will decide what your report puts first.
Understand
You do not yet know what to make of what is happening to you, and you want to know before doing anything about it.
“I no longer understand what is going on at work.”
Understand what is going on
“Am I overreacting, or is this genuinely not normal?”
Find out whether I am reading too much into itfew tools offer this
Whatever CONTRADICTS your reading comes first, on equal footing with whatever confirms it. If your exchanges carry signs of attention that do not fit the story you tell yourself, they are written down, not tucked into a footnote. It is the uncomfortable part of the report, and it is what makes the rest credible.
“What am I doing that keeps this going?”
Understand my own partfew tools offer this
What you do that keeps the situation going: hasty readings of intent, quick attributions, moments where self-assertion falls short or overshoots. It is the part of the report that does not flatter, and the only one you can act on alone. With fifteen participants it yields little — at that scale you are no longer observing a relationship — and the report says so rather than padding.
Document
You already know what you are living through. What you lack is an exhibit somebody else can read.
“How do I prove what I am going through?”
Document dated facts
The dated record of facts moves to the front and becomes the main object: a timeline of counts and dates, each line pointing back to the message that establishes it, exportable separately so it can be attached to a case file. You can see an extract further down this page.
Act
Something is coming up — a meeting, a decision, a conversation you have to hold — and you want to walk into it prepared.
“Do I stay, or do I leave?”
Decide: stay or leave
“I have a meeting coming up and I don’t know how to prepare.”
Prepare a meeting
“I have to negotiate, and I am starting from behind.”
Prepare a negotiation
“I just want things to calm down.”
Lower the tension
That choice changes neither the facts established, nor the models used, nor the standard of evidence. It changes what the report leads with, what it develops, and what it offers you at the end. Up to 3 goals, in the order that matters to you. The first one drives the opening and the closing of the report.
Three requests are missing from this list, and we tell you why on screen: proving harassment, proving that you are right, finding out whether someone is a narcissistic abuser. The first two call for a verdict, the third for a clinical label on an absent third party. « Document dated facts » serves you better: it produces an exhibit, not an opinion.
You will find no testimonial here, no rating out of five, no analysis counter. ScanMyJob has just opened: it has no customers to quote, and inventing the first ones would be a poor way to begin with someone about to hand us their work conversations.
Established facts, never a characterisation
ScanMyJob records what your conversations contain: dates, counts, sequences. It does not say whether this is harassment, puts no clinical label on anyone, and does not settle who is right.
What it does
- Count, date, place things in a sequence.
- Show what contradicts your reading as much as what confirms it.
- Say when the conversations provided do not document the question.
What it does not do
- Issue a legal characterisation — that belongs to a judge.
- Diagnose a person who has not been heard.
- Prove you right.
This is not a publisher being cautious, it is your own interest: an employee who accuses on the strength of an automated verdict weakens their own case. A record of dated facts, by contrast, can be relied upon.
What your report reveals
Whichever objective you tick, everything starts in the same place: a record of what is measurable in your exchanges. Dates, counts, and the message that establishes each line. Here is an extract.
The question people looking for this kind of tool ask most often is not « am I being harassed » but « how do I prove it ». They are not after a verdict: they are building a case file. That is exactly what this record produces.
4 February → 17 March — 6 weeks
17 follow-ups received from J.D. (manager) after 8 pm, 4 of them on a Sunday.
Established on 17 timestamped messages, quoted in the report appendix.
22 February, 6.41 pm
Removed from the « Q1 Budget » thread (12 participants), after having received 31 messages in it.
Established on the removal event and the 31 messages preceding it.
11 January → 30 April
Median reply time to your requests: 3 days and 4 hours. Yours to theirs: 42 minutes.
Established on 96 requests matched to their replies.
Not applicable
Remarks made in front of third parties: this measure requires a group channel. In a two-person exchange it cannot be computed — and will therefore not be displayed as zero.
Every line points back to the dated message that establishes it. The record exports separately from the report, so that it can be attached to a case file.
Dated to the minute, sourced message by message.
Exports separately from the report.
No line characterises anything: no intent, no diagnosis.
Every line points back to the dated message that establishes it. The record exports separately from the report, so that it can be attached to a case file.
What ScanMyJob sees, and what it will never hold
49
theoretical models
Attachment, JD-R, Karasek, organisational justice, LMX, Thomas-Kilmann, Harvard… across ten families. A router keeps the ones your situation calls for: applying them all to everyone would say nothing about anyone.
15
Up to 15 participants
A pair, a small team or a whole channel. With several people, the report observes structure — who replies to whom, who is kept out of a thread — which a two-person conversation cannot carry.
J.D.
Initials, not names
The report says « J.D. (manager) ». The substitution happens on upload: no table linking an initial to a name exists anywhere, to store or to protect.
To be plain about it: within a team you know, initials remain recognisable. This is pseudonymisation, not anonymity — hence the usage undertaking requested before the report is handed over.
Anonymised in your browser
Names, phone numbers and addresses are replaced on your device, before anything is sent. No real name leaves your browser.
Accepted formats
One report, one price
€8.00
A single offer, with no cut-down version and no add-ons.
- The full report, matched to your situation and your goals.
- The dated record of facts, exportable on its own.
- Up to 15 participants, identified by initials and role.
- What contradicts your reading, as much as what confirms it.
No account needed. The amount is converted into your currency at checkout.
Frequently asked questions
Do my conversations leave my browser?
Names, phone numbers and addresses are replaced with initials on your device, before anything is sent: no real name leaves your browser. The content of the messages is transmitted, so that it can be analysed — that is necessary, and better said plainly than left to suggest that everything stays with you.
Can the report establish that I am being harassed?
No, and that is deliberate: a legal qualification belongs to a judge. ScanMyJob establishes dated, counted, sourced facts. Those can be relied upon, whereas an automated verdict is disputed in a single sentence — and weakens whoever invokes it.
Can I hand it to a lawyer or to a labour inspector?
Yes — that is in fact its main use, and the record of facts exports separately for exactly that. The report names no one: it designates participants by their initials and their role, “J.D. (manager)”.
How many people can a conversation contain?
Up to fifteen. With several, the report also observes structure: who answers whom, who is kept out of a thread. Beyond fifteen the import refuses the file and says so, rather than analysing part of the group in silence.
Is there a subscription, or a fuller version?
Neither: one report, one single payment, no account to create. There is no cut-down version and nothing to unlock — deliberately crippling a lower tier would be the opposite of what ScanMyJob promises.
What if my exchanges do not document what I am looking for?
The report says so. Choosing “prepare a negotiation” on exchanges that contain none does not manufacture a section: the question is declared undocumented. And a measurement that cannot be made is never displayed as zero — a zero would read as an absence of fact when it is an absence of measurement.
How it works
Upload
Drop a WhatsApp, Slack or Teams export, or an email thread. Names are replaced by initials in your browser, before anything is sent.
Declare
You say who is who — manager, colleague, HR, contractor — and what you expect from the report. A role cannot be guessed from a file: getting it wrong would distort the whole analysis.
Receive
A full report and its dated, exportable record of facts. You know what it will contain before you pay.