Hello Emma,
Overall result
Moderate PTSDYou show moderate symptoms of post-traumatic stress. The event has left a mark that deserves attention, and some support could be helpful.
Your profile at a glance
Detailed analysis
This tendency is present in you — here is what it sheds light on.
Re-experiencing arises intermittently and is a source of significant discomfort.
Your answers point to manifestations that are present but contained on re-experiencing. The moderate level typically reflects activation at certain moments, often linked to identifiable triggers (stressful situations, relational conflicts, periods of fatigue or isolation). At this stage, the dimension is not dominant in how you function, but it is worth watching: the main risk of the moderate range is that it worsens through accumulation. Concretely, tracking the frequency rather than the intensity of any single episode gives a truer picture of how things are evolving: it is repetition, more than one-off strength, that tips the moderate range into the marked range. Keeping a regular check-in (a brief journal, a conversation with a trusted person) can help you anticipate. Identifying two or three recurring triggers and preparing a simple response in advance — a pause, a phone call, a soothing activity — lowers the chance of the dimension settling in. If other dimensions shift in parallel, this one may become more prominent through a cumulative effect; and if these manifestations gain ground despite your efforts, raising it early with a professional is in no way disproportionate — that is often the stage at which support is most effective and shortest.
Recommendations
- ✓Learn sensory grounding techniques
- ✓Mindfulness can help manage intrusions
- ✓Talk about your experiences with a trusted person
This tendency is clear in you — here is what it reveals, to understand and move forward.
Avoidance is a central mechanism that restricts your life in a significant way.
Your answers describe a marked trait on avoidance. At this level, the dimension can be self-sustaining through self-reinforcing mechanisms (avoidance, narrowed attention, or rumination), whose exact form depends on the dimension involved. This trait typically shows up across several everyday contexts, not only in exceptional situations. Understanding the self-reinforcing mechanism is often the key: for example, avoiding a situation brings short-term relief but confirms to the brain that the situation was dangerous, which strengthens avoidance the next time. Spotting this kind of loop in your own daily life — without judging yourself — is already a lever for change, because you can only act on what you have first identified. It may interact with other high dimensions in the profile — for instance by worsening the sense of overload, or by limiting the resources available to cope. It can be helpful to talk it through with a professional (psychologist, doctor) to explore in more detail what is at play and to identify levers for action; structured approaches such as cognitive and behavioural therapies work precisely on these chains, through small, concrete and realistic steps rather than willpower alone.
Recommendations
- ✓Exposure therapy is strongly recommended
- ✓Avoidance maintains the disorder: each exposure helps you heal
- ✓Work with a therapist who specialises in PTSD
This tendency is present in you — here is what it sheds light on.
You show moderate signs of hyperarousal: startle responses, irritability or sleep difficulties.
Your answers describe moderate signs of hyperarousal: startle responses, irritability or sleep difficulties. In post-traumatic stress, hyperarousal reflects an alarm system that has stayed 'switched on' after the event: the body keeps preparing for danger even though the threat has passed. One way of reading it — to weigh against your own experience — is that these reactions, sometimes baffling ('why do I startle at nothing?'), are not a sign of fragility but a normal physiological response to an abnormal experience. The moderate score indicates manifestations that are present without being overwhelming. Regulation techniques (sensory grounding, breathing, sleep hygiene) help ease this activation day to day. Above all, this test is a screening tool: if these signs persist, worsen, or weigh on your life, a professional trained in psychotrauma (approaches such as EMDR or trauma-focused CBT are effective) can support you — talking about it is a step toward relief.
Recommendations
- ✓Practise relaxation and heart-rate coherence breathing
- ✓Regular physical activity helps regulate the nervous system
- ✓Establish a soothing sleep routine
This tendency is clear in you — here is what it reveals, to understand and move forward.
Negative cognitions are deeply rooted and colour how you perceive yourself, others and the world.
Your high score describes deeply rooted negative cognitions that colour how you perceive yourself, others and the world ('I am in danger', 'you can't trust anyone', 'it's my fault'). In post-traumatic stress, these beliefs are not opinions but an imprint of the event: the trauma has reorganised your reading of the world around threat and the loss of safety. One reading hypothesis — to weigh against your experience — is that these cognitions, by filtering every situation, keep the state of stress and avoidance alive, and can lead to isolation. It is important to say it plainly: a high score here, especially after a traumatic event, fully warrants specialised support. Trauma-focused therapies (EMDR, trauma CBT) work precisely on these cognitions and on the imprint of the event, with documented effectiveness. This test does not make a diagnosis, but it signals a suffering that deserves to be heard by a professional.
Recommendations
- ✓Trauma-focused CBT works specifically on these beliefs
- ✓EMDR allows memories and associated beliefs to be reprocessed
- ✓Regular therapeutic work is needed
Profile synthesis
Your profile shows moderate manifestations. Some dimensions deserve attention without being alarming: they describe real but contained difficulties that do not yet occupy the centre of how you function. The moderate level is precisely the one where observation is most useful, because it can move in either direction depending on what happens in your life. Spotting the contexts and moments when these dimensions intensify — fatigue, conflicts, overload, isolation — gives you concrete levers to act early. Talking about it with a trusted person or a professional, even without urgency, can help clarify what is at play and prevent a worsening through accumulation.
How your dimensions interact
Several dimensions show high scores at the same time (Avoidance, Negative cognitions). These dimensions do not operate in isolation: they can reinforce one another, each feeding the others in a loop that makes the overall picture heavier than the sum of its parts. The good news about this mechanism is that it also works the other way round: targeted work on one of them, often the most accessible or the most overwhelming, can have positive knock-on effects on the others. This is exactly the kind of link a professional can help untangle, so you can choose where to start rather than facing everything at once.
Your action plan
Right now
- →Avoidance — Exposure therapy is strongly recommended
- →Avoidance — Avoidance maintains the disorder: each exposure helps you heal
- →Negative cognitions — Trauma-focused CBT works specifically on these beliefs
- →Negative cognitions — EMDR allows memories and associated beliefs to be reprocessed
In the coming weeks
- →Re-experiencing — Learn sensory grounding techniques
- →Hyperarousal — Practise relaxation and heart-rate coherence breathing
In the long run
- →Retake this test in 3 to 6 months to measure your progress. Meaningful changes on the high dimensions are often visible over that timescale.
- →If you begin therapeutic work, identify together 1 to 2 priority dimensions rather than tackling everything at once — targeted work is more effective than working on everything globally.
- →Build a lasting support network: a health professional (psychologist, psychiatrist, GP), your circle, possibly a support group. Strength comes from numbers and complementarity.
- →Take care of the physiological basics (sleep, nutrition, physical activity): they do not cure, but they strongly shape your psychological availability for therapeutic work.
Avenues to explore
These are hypotheses, not conclusions. You are the one who knows whether they resonate.
It may be that you are developing an avoidance strategy as a protective mechanism against memories or situations that reactivate anxiety. Your high avoidance score (60%) combined with negative cognitions (60%) suggests you might anticipate suffering and withdraw pre-emptively — an understandable attempt to preserve your emotional balance.
Check for yourself: Over the course of a week, note the situations, places or people you tend to flee or put off. Check whether this withdrawal temporarily eases your anxiety but leaves the discomfort intact (or amplifies it) when you face it again. That is the signature of avoidance.
A possible explanation is that your defeatist or self-critical thoughts (negative cognitions: 60%) maintain a constant inner vigilance — even though your intrusive re-experiencing stays moderate (40%). You might 'ruminate' on what could go wrong rather than reliving direct flashbacks.
Check for yourself: Observe your inner dialogue for 3-4 days. Count how many times a day you anticipate dangers, blame yourself or put yourself down. If these automatic thoughts are frequent and hard to control, they are probably a central source of your stress.
In some people with this profile, moderate hyperarousal (40%) combined with avoidance suggests a nervous system that is vigilant but 'contained' — as if you had learned to stifle your physiological reactions (tension, alertness) in order to function. This could create a dull fatigue or a sense of being 'stuck'.
Check for yourself: Pay attention to your body for 5 days: do you feel chronic tension (jaw, shoulders, chest), fatigue out of proportion to rest, or difficulty truly 'unwinding'? Such signs would confirm a contained over-activation.
It may be that a specific event or period shaped how much you trust certain contexts, without generating constant flashbacks — hence this 'moderate-moderate' profile on re-experiencing and hyperarousal. Your negative cognitions might reflect a reappraisal of your safety rather than an overwhelming traumatic memory.
Check for yourself: Identify whether there is ONE moment, ONE situation or ONE relationship that marked a 'before/after' in your trust. Is the caution you've felt since more a lesson learned than a permanent neurological distress? If so, this avenue resonates.
13 clinical reading frameworks are applied to your profile below — the exact number announced for this test.
Reading frameworks
Recognised clinical frameworks applied to your profile, as additional perspectives to weigh.
Nervous system state — Sympathetic (mobilisation) with a dorsal tendency (freezing through avoidance)
Moderate hyperarousal (40%) and high avoidance (60%) suggest a swing between sympathetic (alert, tension) and dorsal (disconnection, withdrawal). The person oscillates between flight activation and adaptive freezing, both reactive to the perceived trauma.
Cognitive pattern — Catastrophising
The high score on negative cognitions (60%) suggests a tendency to amplify the perceived threat and to anticipate the worst. This distortion could maintain hypervigilance and reinforce avoidance behaviours, forming an anxious loop to explore with the person.
Cognitive pattern — Dichotomous thinking (all-or-nothing)
In the face of a traumatic event, binary thinking (absolute safety vs. imminent danger) is common. It could explain why avoidance reaches 60%: a black-and-white perception of the world that makes ambiguous situations intolerable.
Early schema — Vulnerability to harm
The moderate PTSD profile, with high negative cognitions and hyperarousal, suggests an activated vulnerability schema: the belief that the world is unpredictable and that threat can strike. This schema sustains vigilance and justifies the massive avoidance (60%).
Cognitive distortions — Sources: Aaron Beck (1976) ; David Burns (1980)
Young's schemas — Sources: Jeffrey Young (1990) ; Jeffrey Young, Janet Klosko, Marjorie Weishaar (2003)
Polyvagal theory — Sources: Stephen Porges (2011) ; Stephen Porges (1995) — proposed/debated theory
Additional clinical frameworks
Recognised models for this domain, applied to your profile as hypotheses to weigh — not a diagnosis.
Models of anxiety and stress
PTSD model (Ehlers & Clark)
Your profile evokes the cycle described by Ehlers & Clark: high negative cognitions (60%) and marked avoidance (60%) suggest you might interpret certain memories or cues as threatening, and that you try to control them by working around them. This pattern can paradoxically maintain the traumatic load, because avoidance prevents the memory from integrating naturally. A gentle exploration of what remains 'stuck' could help distinguish past danger from the present.
Sources: Anke Ehlers, David M. Clark (2000)
Appraisal and coping (Lazarus & Folkman)
It may be that, faced with potentially threatening situations or surfacing memories, you have favoured coping centred on avoidance or emotional withdrawal rather than active problem-solving. This pattern can be protective in the short term, but it reduces your sense of mastery over the long term. Identifying which resources or strategies you could mobilise differently would deserve some attention.
Sources: Richard Lazarus, Susan Folkman (1984)
Intolerance of uncertainty (Dugas)
Your high negative cognitions could also reflect difficulty tolerating uncertainty about your safety or your future reactions. This profile sometimes evokes chronic worry fuelled by the need to predict or control what might recur. Notice whether negative anticipation takes up a lot of mental space: it is a useful avenue to untangle.
Sources: Michel Dugas, Fabien Gagnon, Robert Ladouceur, Mark Freeston (1998)
Tripartite model (Clark & Watson)
Your moderate global score with present hyperarousal (40%) suggests an anxious component: your body sometimes stays on alert. At the same time, avoidance and negative cognitions could come with emotional withdrawal or reduced engagement in positive activities. You may swing between physiological tension and emotional numbing: this is a common configuration after a difficult experience.
Sources: Lee Anna Clark, David Watson (1991)
Cross-cutting frameworks
Window of tolerance (Siegel)
Your moderate hyperarousal score (40%) suggests that you swing between normal activation and peaks of bodily or emotional tension. It may be that certain contexts (especially situations that evoke the trauma) tip you out of your 'window of tolerance', producing emotional overwhelm or defensive rigidity. Have you noticed moments when you feel either frozen or flooded, rather than balanced?
Emotion regulation (Gross)
Your high avoidance (60%) could reflect a strategy of suppressing or avoiding thoughts and sensations linked to the trauma, rather than a cognitive reappraisal of the experience. This profile often evokes a short-term defensive mechanism: it soothes temporarily, but can maintain hypervigilance over the long run. Do you rely more on avoidance (places, people, thoughts), or do you try to recontextualise what happened?
Negative cognitive triad (Beck)
Your high negative cognitions (60%) are frequently associated with a clouded view of the self ('I am fragile/dangerous'), the world ('danger persists') and the future ('nothing will change'). These automatic thoughts, though they seem self-evident in the moment, are often distortions maintained by the trauma. Have you identified specific beliefs that recur regularly and leave you paralysed?
Defence mechanisms (Vaillant)
Your profile suggests a mobilisation of rather immature or neurotic defences (possible denial, repression, projection) in the face of the traumatic memory. These mechanisms protect in the short term, but risk freezing the emotional work. A shift toward more mature defences — such as humour, sublimation or introspection — could foster a gradual integration of the trauma. Do you sometimes feel able to step back from your reactions, or are they more automatic and overwhelming?
Hierarchy of needs (Maslow)
Moderate PTSD with hyperarousal suggests an unresolved baseline insecurity: your needs for safety and emotional stability remain hindered by the anticipation of danger. As long as this foundation is not sufficiently restored, the higher levels (belonging, esteem, fulfilment) stay fragile. Do you feel a difficulty in feeling 'safe' even in objectively secure settings?
These frameworks do not constitute a medical diagnosis.
Resources & exercise
7-day observation journal
Each day, spot one situation where “Avoidance” showed up. Note the automatic thought, the emotion (0–100) and what you did. Then write one more balanced, alternative reading. After 7 days, re-read your notes: the recurring patterns become visible — the first step to change them.
Support resources
If you are struggling, you are not alone. United States: call or text 988 (Suicide & Crisis Lifeline, 24/7). Elsewhere: find your local line at findahelpline.com. This report supports self-knowledge and does not replace a consultation with a psychologist or doctor.
Your answers in detail
1. I have painful, involuntary memories of the traumatic event.
Answer : Rarely
You answered "Rarely". Can you tell me a bit more about when this comes up?
It mostly surfaces in situations that matter to me, when I feel under pressure or emotionally invested.
2. I have nightmares related to the traumatic event.
Answer : Rarely
And how long have you noticed this?
It's been more present for a few months, though I recognise it from before as well.
3. I have flashbacks or the feeling of reliving the event.
Answer : Rarely
4. Images of the event come back to me in an uncontrolled way.
Answer : Rarely
5. Certain sounds, smells or sensations bring me abruptly back to the event.
Answer : Rarely
6. I feel intense distress when something reminds me of the event.
Answer : Rarely
7. …
The next questions (7, 8…) continue in your test. This sample only shows the beginning — the full test has 60 questions, and every answer refines your report.
What now?
You've just seen what your answers reveal. Your Full Assessment goes further: a personalized, step-by-step path to turn this understanding into concrete change — at your own pace.
Get YOUR Post-Traumatic Stress Test report
Answer the 60 questions, then unlock your full report: interpretation, 12 clinical reading frameworks, recommendations and PDF — from 1.99 €.
← Back to the test page