This tendency is present in you — here is what it sheds light on.

You show moderate signs of the wound of rejection. In certain situations, you may feel like you're in the way or withdraw into yourself.

Your answers point to manifestations that are present but contained on the wound of rejection. The moderate level typically reflects an activation that comes and goes, often tied to identifiable triggers (stressful situations, relational conflicts, periods of fatigue or isolation). At this stage, the dimension is not dominant in how you function, but it deserves attention: the main risk with the moderate range is that it worsens through accumulation. In practice, watching the frequency rather than the intensity of an isolated episode gives a truer picture of how things are evolving: it is repetition, more than one-off strength, that tips the moderate toward the marked. Keeping a regular check-in (a brief journal, a conversation with a trusted person) can help you anticipate. Identifying two or three recurring triggers and preparing a simple response in advance — a pause, a phone call, a soothing activity — lowers the chance of the dimension settling in. If other dimensions evolve alongside it, this one can become more salient through a cumulative effect; and if these manifestations gain ground despite your efforts, raising it early with a professional is in no way disproportionate — it is often at this stage that support is most effective and shortest.

This tendency is clear in you — here is what it reveals, to understand and move forward.

The wound of abandonment is significantly present. The dependent's mask is active, pushing you to constantly seek the presence and validation of others.

Your answers describe a marked trait on the wound of abandonment. At this level, the dimension can sustain itself through self-reinforcing mechanisms (avoidance, narrowed attention, or rumination), whose exact form depends on the dimension at play. This trait typically shows up in several everyday contexts, not only in exceptional situations. Understanding the self-reinforcing mechanism is often the key: for example, avoiding a situation brings short-term relief but confirms to the brain that it was dangerous, which strengthens the avoidance next time. Spotting this kind of loop in your own day-to-day — without judging yourself — is already a lever for change, since you can only act on what you have first identified. It can interact with other elevated dimensions of the profile — for example by worsening the feeling of overload or by limiting the resources available to cope. It may help to discuss it with a professional (psychologist, doctor) to explore in more detail what is at play and identify levers for action; structured approaches such as cognitive and behavioural therapies work precisely on these chains, through small, concrete and realistic steps rather than willpower alone.

This tendency is present in you — here is what it sheds light on.

You show moderate signs of the wound of humiliation. At times, shame or guilt keep you from taking care of yourself.

Your answers signal moderate signs of the wound of humiliation: at times, shame or guilt keep you from taking care of yourself. In Lise Bourbeau's model of the wounds (a framework to weigh against your own experience, not a diagnosis), this wound is often linked to the 'masochist's mask': a tendency to devote yourself, to forget yourself, to feel unworthy of receiving. One way of reading it is that shame acts here as a quiet brake: it whispers that you don't deserve to be looked after, which leads you to neglect yourself or to load yourself up for others. The moderate nature of the score suggests a trace that is present but not dominant. The most fruitful lever is to reintroduce small acts of self-attention without justifying them (a pleasure, a rest, a 'no'), and to observe the guilt that arises as a signal to tame rather than to obey: taking care of yourself takes nothing away from anyone.

This tendency is clear in you — here is what it reveals, to understand and move forward.

The wound of betrayal is significantly present. The controller's mask dominates, pushing you to control everything and to distrust the intentions of others.

Your answers point to a wound of betrayal that is significantly present, with the 'controller's mask' front and centre: a need to master everything and distrust of others' intentions. In this framework (to weigh against your own experience, not a diagnosis), betrayal points back to an early trust that was let down, which learned to anticipate the worst so as never to be caught off guard again. One way of reading it is that control works as a protection: mastering, checking, not depending — it is an attempt to make a fresh betrayal impossible, at the cost of permanent tension and a difficulty in letting go and trusting. The high nature of the score deserves attention. The lever is to experiment, in safe relationships and through small steps, with delegating or showing vulnerability without the dreaded catastrophe occurring: these corrective experiences gradually loosen the need for control. Support can sustain this work.

This tendency is present in you — here is what it sheds light on.

You show moderate signs of the wound of injustice. Perfectionism and rigidity can sometimes keep you from enjoying life.

Your answers signal moderate signs of the wound of injustice: perfectionism and rigidity can sometimes keep you from enjoying life. In the model of the wounds (a framework to weigh against your own experience, not a diagnosis), this wound is associated with the 'rigid's mask': high standards, self-control, difficulty allowing yourself imperfection and pleasure. One way of reading it is that the quest for justice and perfection may have been built as a way to protect yourself or to earn your place: 'if everything is fair and perfect, nothing can be held against me.' The moderate nature of the score suggests a tendency that is present without being confining. The most useful lever is to practise loosening the standard in low-stakes areas (accepting a 'good enough', allowing yourself an unearned pleasure), so as to relearn that your worth and your safety do not depend on perfection — and that flexibility is not slackness but liberation.