Hello Emma,
Overall result
Moderate schizotypal traitsA few schizotypal traits stand out at a moderate level: a somewhat distinctive way of thinking and perceiving, originality, a certain social distance. This is NOT a diagnosis or a sign of disorder: schizotypy is now understood as a dimensional trait present in the general population, often linked to creativity. This profile is an invitation to self-knowledge.
Your profile at a glance
Detailed analysis
This tendency is present in you — here is what it sheds light on.
Unusual beliefs, superstition, the sense that ordinary events carry a personal meaning.
Your moderate score describes a leaning toward magical thinking (believing in connections, meaningful coincidences, intuitions or superstitions) and at times toward ideas of reference (the impression that neutral events concern you personally). It is essential to frame this without dramatising it: moderate magical thinking is extremely widespread in the general population (superstitions, intuitions, symbolic thought) and has nothing to do with pathology. Research (Claridge's dimensional model of schizotypy) shows that these traits exist on a continuum, and that mild forms can even go hand in hand with creativity and openness. One reading, to weigh against your own experience, is that this leaning probably reflects a rich, associative and symbolic kind of thinking. The only point to watch — if these experiences were to become invasive, a source of anxiety, or very far removed from shared reality — would be to talk it over with a professional, but a moderate level points more to a cognitive style than to a difficulty.
Recommendations
- ✓Approach this trait without worry: a moderate, associative and symbolic kind of thinking is common and can nourish creativity, intuition and openness.
- ✓If some ideas of reference create discomfort, practise reality-testing (looking for neutral, alternative explanations for coincidences).
- ✓Channel your rich thinking into creative or reflective activities where it becomes an asset.
- ✓If these experiences were to become invasive, distressing or very disconnected from shared reality, a conversation with a professional would help clarify things, without dramatising.
This tendency is present in you — here is what it sheds light on.
Mild sensory distortions, illusions, atypical bodily sensations.
Your moderate score describes somewhat unusual perceptual experiences (a particular sensory sensitivity, impressions that are hard to explain, perceptions that feel more intense or atypical). It is important to read this result with measure and not to equate it with hallucinations (which are of an entirely different nature): at a moderate level, it usually reflects a heightened perceptual sensitivity or intense subjective experiences, common in the general population and especially among highly sensitive or highly creative people. One reading, to weigh against your own experience, is that this dimension may be linked to your magical thinking and reflect a richer, more intense way of perceiving the world. The point to watch, as with the previous dimension, concerns only invasive or distressing forms: if perceptual experiences were to become frequent, troubling or disconnected from shared reality, professional advice would be warranted. But a moderate score suggests a particular sensitivity rather than a worrying sign.
Recommendations
- ✓Consider this perceptual sensitivity without worry: at a moderate level, it often reflects a sensory and subjective richness, sometimes linked to creativity.
- ✓Adjust your environment if you are sensitive to sensory over-stimulation (as with high sensitivity).
- ✓If some experiences are troubling, grounding in the concrete (5-4-3-2-1) helps you refocus on shared reality.
- ✓If perceptual experiences were to become frequent, intense or a source of anxiety, professional advice is recommended — as a matter of caution and clarity, without dramatising.
This tendency is present in you — here is what it sheds light on.
Limited interest in close relationships, a blunted social pleasure.
Your moderate score describes a leaning toward social withdrawal and possibly social anhedonia (deriving less pleasure from interactions). It is helpful to distinguish this withdrawal from anxious avoidance (fear of judgement) and from schizoid withdrawal (a pure preference for solitude): in the schizotypal register, withdrawal can come with a sense of being out of step or different from others, tied to a distinctive way of thinking and perceiving. One reading, to weigh against your own experience, is that this withdrawal could be partly a consequence of that feeling of being 'on a different wavelength' rather than an absence of any need for connection. The moderate level of the score suggests a withdrawal that is present but not total. The point to watch is balance: making sure this withdrawal does not deprive you of useful support, and finding, if you wish, contexts or people who share your way of seeing, where the sense of being out of step fades.
Recommendations
- ✓Question the nature of your withdrawal: a positive preference for solitude, avoidance out of anxiety, or a feeling of being out of step with others? The answer points the way forward.
- ✓Look for contexts or people who share your interests and your way of seeing: the sense of being out of step often eases there.
- ✓Take care to keep a few quality bonds as resources, even if you value solitude.
- ✓If the withdrawal comes with suffering or unwanted isolation, support can help you find a balance that suits you.
This tendency is present in you — here is what it sheds light on.
A way of speaking, thinking or presenting oneself perceived as original or offbeat.
Your moderate score describes a certain originality in the way you think, express yourself, present yourself or live, which can step outside conventions. It is important to value this dimension: eccentricity, originality and non-conformity are traits that, far from being flaws, are often associated with creativity, innovation and free thinking. Research even links 'positive' (creative) schizotypy to enhanced creative abilities. One reading, to weigh against your own experience, is that this originality is probably an authentic and precious part of your identity. The moderate level of the score suggests it remains socially manageable. The only point to watch is, as with the other dimensions, the balance between staying true to yourself (precious) and adapting to contexts that require it (professional ones in particular), without disowning your singularity. The point is not to 'fit the mould' but to choose where and how to express your originality.
Recommendations
- ✓Value your originality as an asset (creativity, free thinking, innovation) rather than living it as a flaw to correct.
- ✓Channel it into fields that value it (creation, research, personal projects) where it becomes a distinctive strength.
- ✓Consciously choose when to adjust your expression to the contexts that require it, without disowning your singularity.
- ✓Surround yourself with people who appreciate your originality: the right environment turns eccentricity into shared richness.
Profile synthesis
Your profile shows moderate schizotypal traits, spread across a somewhat magical and associative kind of thinking, sometimes intense perceptions, a leaning toward social withdrawal and a certain originality. Before any reading, an absolutely essential framing: this test measures traits on a CONTINUUM and is IN NO WAY a diagnosis or a sign of psychotic disorder. The modern conception of schizotypy (Claridge and the 'fully dimensional' model) treats these traits as present in the general population, to varying degrees, and stresses their frequent link with CREATIVITY, openness and original thinking. Moderate levels, like yours, point far more to a singular cognitive and perceptual style than to a difficulty. An integrative reading, to weigh against your own experience, is that these dimensions sketch a rich, intense and original way of thinking and perceiving the world, which can be a genuine resource (creativity, intuition, free thinking), while also coming with a sense of being out of step with others (hence part of the social withdrawal). It is worth repeating that this profile is in no way worrying in itself: the task is to know and channel these strengths, and to find contexts where your singularity is valued. The ONLY thing that would warrant professional advice would be if some experiences (magical thinking, perceptions) became invasive, distressing or very disconnected from shared reality — which a moderate level does not suggest. At 36, understanding this cognitive temperament better often makes it easier to inhabit. If this reading speaks to you, all the better; if not, it is your own experience that holds the truth.
How your dimensions interact
The four dimensions of your profile illuminate one another and sketch a coherent cognitive and perceptual functioning. Magical thinking and unusual perceptions belong to the same register: a rich, associative and intense way of taking in the world (so-called 'positive' schizotypy, linked to creativity). Eccentricity is its visible expression in style and identity. And social withdrawal could be partly a CONSEQUENCE of this whole: thinking and perceiving differently can generate a sense of being out of step with others, which fosters a certain distance. One reading, to weigh against your own experience, is therefore that these traits are not four independent symptoms but facets of a single cognitive singularity. The implication is rather positive: the common root (richness and originality of thought) is also a resource (creativity, intuition, depth). The task is not to reduce these traits but to channel them and to ease the sense of being out of step by finding suitable contexts. The only watch-point, cutting across all dimensions, concerns intensity: as long as magical thinking and perceptions remain moderate and non-distressing, they belong to the realm of style; if they intensified to the point of disturbing your relationship to reality, professional advice would be warranted. Your moderate profile clearly falls in the first case.
Your action plan
Right now
- →Approach this profile with serenity: moderate schizotypal traits are common, linked to creativity, and are in no way a sign of disorder. The task is self-knowledge.
- →Identify where your originality and rich thinking are assets (creation, reflection, distinctive interests) and give them room.
- →If you feel out of step socially, start spotting the contexts or people where that feeling fades.
In the coming weeks
- →Over 1 to 3 months, channel your strengths (original thinking, intuition, creativity) into projects or fields that value them and where your singularity becomes a distinctive asset.
- →Cultivate a few quality bonds, ideally with people who share your way of seeing, to ease the sense of being out of step.
- →If some experiences (magical thinking, perceptions) create discomfort, practise reality-testing and grounding.
In the long run
- →In the long run, aim for a life that honours your cognitive singularity: the goal is to make your originality an owned resource, in contexts that welcome it, rather than living it as a flaw.
- →Surround yourself with an environment (relationships, activities) that values your way of thinking and perceiving.
- →Important: if at some point experiences (perceptions, ideas) were to become frequent, intense, distressing or very disconnected from shared reality, professional advice would be recommended — for clarity and caution, without any dramatising. A moderate level does not call for it.
Avenues to explore
These are hypotheses, not conclusions. You are the one who knows whether they resonate.
It may be that your moderate schizotypal traits reflect 'positive' schizotypy linked to creativity — a rich and original way of thinking — rather than a worrying sign.
Check for yourself: Ask yourself: are my original thinking and my intuitions more a source of creativity and interest, or a source of anxiety and painful disconnection? The first answer points toward a resource.
One possible explanation is that your social withdrawal is partly a consequence of feeling out of step (thinking/perceiving differently) rather than an absence of any need for connection.
Check for yourself: Observe: do you feel more at ease and connected with people who share your way of seeing? If so, it is the gap, not a lack of interest, that feeds the withdrawal.
It may be that the relevant question is intensity: as long as these traits remain moderate and non-distressing, they belong to a cognitive style; it is only if they intensified that advice would be useful.
Check for yourself: Assess without dramatising: do these experiences hamper your daily life or your relationship to shared reality? If not, they belong to your singularity; if they do and this is increasing, a professional can shed light.
7 clinical reading frameworks are applied to your profile below — the exact number announced for this test.
Reading frameworks
Recognised clinical frameworks applied to your profile, as additional perspectives to weigh.
Nervous system state — heightened perceptual sensitivity
Intense perceptual experiences can evoke a nervous system with high receptivity (close to high sensitivity). Recognising this perceptual intensity as a characteristic, not a dysfunction, helps you make peace with it (regulation, grounding). Do you perceive the world more intensely or atypically than most people?
Cognitive pattern — ideas of reference (to test out)
Magical thinking can come with ideas of reference (the impression that neutral events concern you). At a moderate level, reality-testing (alternative explanations) helps to nuance them. Worth exploring without worry: do you ever feel personally targeted by neutral events?
Attachment — Sources: John Bowlby (1969) ; Kim Bartholomew, Leonard Horowitz (1991)
Cognitive distortions — Sources: Aaron Beck (1976) ; David Burns (1980)
Young's schemas — Sources: Jeffrey Young (1990)
Polyvagal theory — Sources: Stephen Porges (2011) — proposed/debated theory
Additional clinical frameworks
Recognised models for this domain, applied to your profile as hypotheses to weigh — not a diagnosis.
Models of personality
Dimensional model of schizotypy (Claridge)
Claridge proposed a 'fully dimensional' view of schizotypy: a continuous trait present in the general population, with a 'positive' side (original thinking, creativity) distinct from clinical forms. This framework destigmatises and links your traits to a creative cognitive style. Do you experience your originality of thought as a resource?
Sources: Gordon Claridge (1997)
Big Five (five-factor model)
In the Big Five, 'positive' schizotypy connects to very high openness to experience (imagination, ideas, aesthetics, unusual experiences). It is a trait associated with creativity. Do you recognise yourself in this broad openness and imaginative richness?
Sources: Costa & McCrae (1992)
Alternative model of personality disorders (DSM-5 Section III)
The DSM-5 alternative model evokes, on a STRICTLY INDICATIVE basis and never as a verdict, a domain of 'psychoticism' (eccentricity, cognitive-perceptual dysregulation). Important: at a moderate, non-distressing level, this belongs to a style, not a disorder. Does this vocabulary feel too strong compared with your own experience?
Sources: American Psychiatric Association (2013)
Cross-cutting frameworks
Broaden-and-build (Fredrickson)
Cultivating the positive experiences that suit YOU (creation, exploration, bonds with people on the same wavelength) broadens your resources. For you, these sources are often original and singular — and that is a richness. Do you know what most nourishes your creative drive and your well-being?
Sources: Barbara Fredrickson (2001)
Self-compassion (Neff)
Neff's self-compassion helps you accept yourself in your singularity rather than judging yourself 'weird' against a norm: your way of thinking and perceiving has value. Do you allow yourself to be original without putting yourself down?
Sources: Kristin Neff (2003)
These frameworks do not constitute a medical diagnosis.
Resources & exercise
7-day observation journal
Each day, spot one situation where “Social withdrawal and anhedonia” showed up. Note the automatic thought, the emotion (0–100) and what you did. Then write one more balanced, alternative reading. After 7 days, re-read your notes: the recurring patterns become visible — the first step to change them.
Support resources
If you are struggling, you are not alone. United States: call or text 988 (Suicide & Crisis Lifeline, 24/7). Elsewhere: find your local line at findahelpline.com. This report supports self-knowledge and does not replace a consultation with a psychologist or doctor.
Your answers in detail
1. I sometimes feel that ordinary events are personally meant for me.
Answer : Somewhat agree
You answered "Somewhat agree". Can you tell me a little more about the moments when this comes up?
I have a very rich imagination and strong intuitions; I often feel a bit out of step with the way other people think.
2. I believe in phenomena that most people consider impossible.
Answer : Neutral
And how long have you noticed this?
For as long as I can remember; it feeds my creativity, even if I sometimes feel misunderstood.
3. I clearly tell a coincidence apart from a meant sign.
Answer : Somewhat agree
4. I sometimes think I can influence events through my thoughts alone.
Answer : Somewhat agree
5. I stick to rational explanations for what happens to me.
Answer :
6. I sometimes see or hear things that others do not perceive.
Answer :
7. …
The next questions (7, 8…) continue in your test. This sample only shows the beginning — the full test has 60 questions, and every answer refines your report.
What now?
You've just seen what your answers reveal. Your Full Assessment goes further: a personalized, step-by-step path to turn this understanding into concrete change — at your own pace.
Get YOUR Schizotypal Traits Test report
Answer the 60 questions, then unlock your full report: interpretation, 7 clinical reading frameworks, recommendations and PDF — from 1.99 €.
← Back to the test page