Skip to main content
Psy AssistantExplore, understand, move forwardScanMyLoveDecode your relationship
📄 Sample report — illustrative profile (fictional persona). Your real report is assessed from YOUR answers after the test.

Hello Emma,

Profile synthesis

Your overall profile reveals a social media relationship that is moderate in overall intensity but notably skewed toward comparison and emotional impact rather than pure behavioural compulsion. At 36, you are at a life stage where social media can serve as both a professional and social tool, yet also as a source of comparison that is difficult to resist, particularly given the curated nature of contemporary platforms. The clustering of your two highest scores—social comparison (60%) and impact on self-esteem (60%)—alongside moderate scores in compulsive checking (40%) and FOMO (40%), suggests that your primary vulnerability is not addiction in the sense of uncontrollable use, but rather a pattern in which selective engagement with social media creates emotional consequences. This is a clinically meaningful finding because it points toward specific levers: moderating not just frequency but content quality and your mindset during engagement. The moderateness of your overall score (50%) indicates that this is a manageable challenge at this stage, and one in which intervention can be both effective and protective. However, the persistence and visibility of comparison and self-esteem impact across daily life warrant deliberate attention now, before patterns deepen. Your capacity to check your phone somewhat intentionally (moderate compulsive checking) suggests you retain executive control that can be strengthened. The combination of your age, gender, and the specific pattern of your results suggests that the meaningful work ahead is less about digital detox and more about developing a more critical, boundaried relationship with what you consume and how you interpret it.

Overall result

Moderate

Your answers suggest moderate signs of problematic social media use, which may occasionally affect your emotional well-being and quality of life. Clinically, this profile is characterized by a combination of partly automated checking, sensitivity to social comparison dynamics and a slight dependence on online validation signals. These mechanisms remain at a stage where targeted behavioral adjustments are generally enough to restore balance, without requiring specialized intervention. Clinical psychology research shows that becoming aware of triggers and restructuring the digital environment are the most effective levers at this stage.

Your profile at a glance

CompulsiveCheckingSocialComparisonFOMO (Fear OfMissing Out)Impact onSelf-Esteem

Detailed analysis

Compulsive CheckingModerate

This tendency is present in you — here is what it sheds light on.

Frequency and automatic nature of social media checking

Your answers suggest that checking social media sometimes becomes automatic, partly escaping your conscious control. Clinically, this corresponds to an emerging activation of conditioned reinforcement circuits: notifications, scrolling loops and variable rewards (likes, messages) begin to short-circuit your deliberate decisions. This phenomenon remains at a moderate and therefore easily reversible stage, but it deserves attention. Clinical psychology research shows that these automatic patterns gradually strengthen if nothing is adjusted. Regaining control over your environmental triggers is the first effective step.

Recommendations

  • You could turn off all non-essential push notifications, in order to break the prompting loops that generate unchosen reflexive checking.
  • You could set two or three fixed time slots per day to check social media, treating these moments as planned appointments rather than spontaneous breaks.
  • You could keep a simplified digital journal for one week, noting each automatic check you notice, in order to become aware of your most frequent triggers.
  • You could replace the reflex of grabbing your phone with a short physical alternative — a few deep breaths, a hot drink — to recreate a space for conscious choice.
Social ComparisonHigh

This tendency is clear in you — here is what it reveals, to understand and move forward.

Tendency to compare yourself to others through content posted on social media

Your answers suggest that social comparison via social media is a significant factor of psychological distress in your daily life. Clinically, this level of exposure to chronic upward comparison is associated with a gradual erosion of self-esteem, an increase in ruminative thoughts and a weakening of body image. Clinical psychology research clearly documents the link between frequent exposure to idealized content and increased anxious and depressive symptoms. Recommendation algorithms tend to amplify this phenomenon by suggesting ever more content of the same type, creating a psychologically impoverished environment.

Recommendations

  • You could carry out a rigorous sorting of your subscriptions, keeping only the accounts that generate neutral or positive emotions, treating this exercise as an act of self-care.
  • You could undertake work on your self-esteem independently of social media — through fulfilling activities, concrete achievements or enriching relationships in real life.
  • You could gradually reduce the time spent on the platforms that concentrate the most comparative content, starting with the times of day when you feel most vulnerable.
  • You could consider therapeutic support oriented toward strengthening self-esteem, notably through recognized approaches such as CBT, which are particularly effective on comparison patterns.
FOMO (Fear Of Missing Out)Moderate

This tendency is present in you — here is what it sheds light on.

Fear of missing information, events, or trends

Your answers suggest that you sometimes feel the fear of missing something when staying disconnected, without this persistently dominating your behavior. Clinically, FOMO at this moderate stage corresponds to situational anxiety linked to monitoring the social stream: the person feels a slight tension at the idea of cutting themselves off from real-time information, but retains the ability to resist it. This mechanism is sustained by the very design of platforms, which create a sense of urgency and stream continuity to maximize connection time. At this stage, voluntary and repeated disconnection is the most effective therapeutic lever.

Recommendations

  • You could remind yourself that the content genuinely important to you will always remain accessible afterward, and that the vast majority of the stream requires no urgent checking.
  • You could practice voluntary and gradual disconnection periods — a few hours at first, then half a day — to experience for yourself that nothing essential escapes you.
  • You could carefully observe what you feel physically and emotionally when you refrain from checking social media, in order to better understand the nature and intensity of this tension.
  • You could cultivate sources of information outside social media — chosen newsletters, podcasts, press — thereby reducing your reliance on real-time streams as your only news channel.
Impact on Self-EsteemHigh

This tendency is clear in you — here is what it reveals, to understand and move forward.

Consequences of social media on confidence and self-image

Your answers suggest that social media has a significant and regular impact on your self-esteem and emotional well-being. Clinically, this level of impact corresponds to a partial dependence on digital validation to regulate self-image: online feedback — or its absence — durably affects the perception of one's own worth. Clinical psychology research clearly establishes a link between this state and an increased risk of anxious and depressive symptoms. Recognized approaches such as CBT offer effective tools to identify and modify the cognitive patterns that link self-esteem to external recognition.

Recommendations

  • You could gradually reduce your time on the platforms that concentrate the most negative experiences for your self-image, starting with the most vulnerable moments of the day.
  • You could begin targeted therapeutic work on self-esteem through recognized approaches such as CBT, which are particularly effective at identifying and modifying beliefs linked to personal worth.
  • You could identify three concrete qualities or actions each day that belong to you independently of any external gaze, in order to rebuild self-esteem anchored in your own frame of reference.
  • You could surround yourself more with people who value you authentically in real life, in order to gradually rebalance your sources of positive feedback about yourself.

How your dimensions interact

A significant correlation appears between your high social comparison score and high self-esteem impact score: these dimensions reinforce one another in a cycle that warrants attention. When you engage with social media and encounter curated presentations of others' lives, comparison is likely triggered, which in turn affects how you feel about yourself and your own life. This pattern is sometimes described as a 'comparison trap'—each exposure can incrementally erode mood and self-perception, which may then unconsciously drive further checking in search of reassurance or distraction, only to repeat the cycle. Conversely, a potential protective element emerges from the gap between your comparison and FOMO scores: you appear to have some emotional separation from the fear of missing out itself, which suggests you may already hold some perspective that not all content is essential. This more measured stance toward FOMO could serve as a foundation for rebuilding your relationship with comparison—the cognitive work of questioning comparison narratives may feel more accessible than addressing fear-based checking. A secondary observation is that your moderate compulsive checking, paired with high self-esteem impact, suggests that even limited exposure is creating significant emotional consequences, which indicates that the content you do consume is particularly potent for you. This is valuable information: it means that curation (choosing what you see) may be more impactful than simple reduction (using less overall).

Your action plan

Right now

  • Disable all social media push notifications within the next 48 hours. This removes one automated prompt to check and gives you back control over the timing of your engagement. Notice over the next week whether checking frequency decreases and whether your awareness shifts
  • Complete a 'feed audit' this week: review the accounts you follow on your primary platform and unfollow or mute at least five accounts that consistently trigger comparison or inadequacy. Replace them with one account that educates or inspires without inducing self-doubt. Document how this change feels over five days
  • Begin a 'mood-media log': for the next two weeks, note your emotional state (1-5 scale) before and after each social media session, along with what you did while engaged. Use this data to identify your personal 'comparison triggers' and highest-impact accounts or activities

In the coming weeks

  • Over the next four to six weeks, implement the 'comparison reframing technique': each time you notice a comparative thought arising, pause and ask 'What is missing from this picture?' and write one piece of hidden context. Practise this with at least 10 situations and observe whether the power of comparison lessens
  • Establish a structured 'windowing schedule' for social media use: designate three 15-20 minute windows per day (e.g., 12:30 pm, 5 pm, 8 pm) as your only permitted browsing times outside of professional or necessary use. Use a phone timer to enforce boundaries. Track adherence and mood changes weekly
  • Develop a 'values clarification document': write down and regularly review (weekly) five things you genuinely value about yourself that are not visible on social media and five real-world accomplishments or growth areas from the past three months. Use this as a counter-narrative to comparison thinking
  • Experiment with one weekly 'offline win': commit to pursuing one personally meaningful activity (a skill, a project, time with loved ones, physical activity) for intrinsic reward only, and journal how this practice affects your self-perception and mood independent of social validation

In the long run

  • Build a sustainable 'intentional media relationship' over six months: the goal is not to eliminate social media but to fundamentally shift how you engage with it. By month three, you should have identified your genuine use cases (professional networking, one genuine community, light entertainment) and have reduced exposure to comparison-heavy content to near zero. By month six, your self-esteem impact score should shift noticeably downward, and you should report that your mood is less volatile around platform use. Use your mood-media logs as the metric
  • Develop a personal 'comparison resilience toolkit' that integrates cognitive techniques (reframing, evidence-gathering), behavioural strategies (offline wins, values-based living), and mindfulness practices (noticing comparison urges without judgment). By six months, you should be able to recognize a comparison thought arising and interrupt it with one of three learned techniques before it deepens
  • Consider exploring a structured program or therapeutic support if self-directed work does not shift the self-esteem impact dimension noticeably within three months. This is not a requirement but an option: working with a therapist trained in cognitive-behavioural approaches to digital wellness or self-esteem could accelerate progress and provide personalized support for the specific life domains in which comparison feels most damaging (professional, relational, aesthetic, etc.)

Avenues to explore

These are hypotheses, not conclusions. You are the one who knows whether they resonate.

It may be that you are experiencing social anxiety intertwined with your use of social media. In some people, this profile — marked by high social comparison and a notable impact on self-esteem — comes with an underlying worry about in-person interactions or about how you are perceived. Social media would then offer a space where this anxiety can be partly managed (control over the message, over the images) but also amplified (constant comparison). Do you notice a difference between your confidence online and your confidence in face-to-face interactions?

Check for yourself: For one week, note each time you check social media: was it preceded by a moment of social anxiety (before an event, after a difficult exchange, or in anticipation of an interaction)? That would reveal a functional link.

One possible explanation would be that you are particularly sensitive to signals of rejection or social exclusion, which would fuel both the social comparison and the impact on your self-esteem. Your moderate FOMO coexists with a high impact on self-esteem, suggesting that what affects you is not so much the fear of missing events, but rather what that would mean about your personal worth or your place in the group. Do the absence of likes, of comments, or digital invisibility affect you particularly?

Check for yourself: Deliberately post something and observe your emotional state over the following 24 hours. Rate the intensity of your thoughts about the reactions you receive (or don't). If these directly influence your mood, that would support this hypothesis.

It may be that you have developed an automatic comparison mechanism that operates independently of any compulsion to check constantly. Your high social comparison score combined with a moderate compulsive-checking score suggests that the harmful effect lies in the way you process what you see, more than in how often you look. In other words, you might check in a relatively controlled way, yet each visit produces a comparative appraisal that affects your self-image. Do you feel you compare yourself involuntarily as soon as you open an app, even when you only meant to have a quick look?

Check for yourself: Try using social media with a specific intention (checking a message, liking a friend's post) and time how long it takes before a comparison or a self-critical judgement emerges spontaneously. Note the quality of this process rather than its frequency.

One possible explanation would be that a reinforcing cycle exists between self-esteem and use: fragile self-esteem pushes you to seek external validation (approval online), which in turn creates a dependence on social feedback. Your profile — moderate on compulsion but high on comparison and impact on self-esteem — is consistent with this loop. You may not check frantically, but you return regularly precisely because that is where your felt worth is called into question and (temporarily) soothed. Do you check social media more during periods when you doubt yourself, or in moments of vulnerability?

Check for yourself: Keep a diary for two weeks: note your self-esteem levels (from 1 to 10) in the morning and your periods of intensive social media use in the afternoon/evening. Look for a correlation: on days when self-esteem is low, does use increase?

14 clinical reading frameworks are applied to your profile below — the exact number announced for this test.

Reading frameworks

Recognised clinical frameworks applied to your profile, as additional perspectives to weigh.

Nervous system stateSympathetic (mobilisation) with swings toward dorsal vagal (freeze / shutdown)

The peaks in social comparison and FOMO activate sympathetic arousal (vigilance, repeated checking, rumination). The moderate compulsivity scores and the clear impact on self-esteem also suggest moments of withdrawal (dorsal) — exhaustion, a sense of helplessness in the face of the cycle. The overall moderate level (50%) reflects an oscillating dysregulation rather than constant hyperarousal.

Cognitive patternCatastrophising

The high FOMO score (40%) suggests a tendency to anticipate the worst (being left out, missing a crucial event). This amplification of perceived threat could fuel compulsive checking as an attempt at control.

Cognitive patternSocial comparison and all-or-nothing thinking

The dominant scores in Social Comparison (60%) and Impact on Self-Esteem (60%) point to a selective reading of other people's content — holding on to the positive aspects, minimising your own strengths. This all-or-nothing thinking (you/others = inferior/superior) sustains dissatisfaction.

Cognitive patternOvergeneralisation and mind reading

The persistence of the compulsive behaviour (40%) despite moderate awareness of its impact suggests an implicit overgeneralisation: 'If I don't check, I'll be forgotten' — an unfounded projection of what others are thinking.

Early schemaDefectiveness / Shame

The high scores in social comparison and impact on self-esteem evoke an early belief of personal inadequacy. Social media becomes a mirror that amplifies this conviction, reinforcing a compulsive search for validation.

Early schemaEmotional Deprivation / Subjugation

The moderate reliance on compulsive checking (40%) could reflect an external search for connection or belonging that goes unmet internally. This subjugation to other people's gaze suggests difficulty drawing on your own emotional resources.

Cognitive distortions — Sources: Beck (1976) ; Burns (1980)

Young schemas — Sources: Young, Klosko & Weishaar (2003) ; Young (1990)

Polyvagal theory — Sources: Porges (2011) ; Dana (2018) — proposed/debated theory

Additional clinical frameworks

Recognised models for this domain, applied to your profile as hypotheses to weigh — not a diagnosis.

Addictions and dependencies

Biopsychosocial model (Griffiths)

This profile evokes several components of addiction as described by Griffiths. Salience appears marked: social media seems to occupy a central place in your attention and your thoughts (moderate compulsive-checking score). Mood modification is likely: it may be that you use social media to regulate negative emotions (social anxiety, comparison). Internal conflict could be present if you feel tension between your actual use and your personal goals. Does social media help you feel temporarily better, even if it then creates guilt or frustration?

Sources: Griffiths (2005)

Relapse prevention (Marlatt)

Your high scores in social comparison (60%) and impact on self-esteem (60%) suggest strong emotional triggers. It may be that moments of self-doubt, loneliness or self-devaluation trigger an intense need to check social media in search of validation or comparison. Marlatt would describe these situations as 'high-risk situations for relapse'. Have you noticed a link between certain emotional states (fatigue, anxiety, involuntary comparison) and the irresistible urge to check your accounts?

Sources: Marlatt & Gordon (1985)

Operant reinforcement

The mechanism of immediate reinforcement is probably at work here. Each check of social media may offer you instant relief: a 'like', a notification, a distraction, or even just temporary relief from FOMO (score 40%). This short cycle (action → immediate gratification) strongly reinforces the behaviour, regardless of the long-term consequences for your self-esteem. Do you recognise this mechanism: you seek confirmation, get a small satisfaction, but come back to it shortly afterwards?

Sources: Skinner (1953)

Cross-cutting frameworks

Cognitive distortions

Your high scores in social comparison (60%) and impact on self-esteem suggest a possible amplification of negative thoughts: a tendency to compare yourself unfavourably with others, to generalise a single negative comment into an overall conclusion about your worth, or to catastrophise the absence of any reaction to a post. These automatic biases are characteristic of online thinking and can sustain the cycle of compulsive checking. Would recognising these distortions be useful to you?

Sources: Beck (1976) ; Burns (1980)

Emotion regulation

Your profile suggests possible emotion regulation through *suppression* rather than *cognitive reappraisal*: repeated checking of social media may function as an attempt (ineffective in the long run) to control anxiety or emotional tension. This avoidance strategy often creates a rebound: the less you tolerate discomfort, the more the urge to check intensifies. Have you noticed this cycle?

Sources: Gross (1998) ; Gross (2015)

Self-efficacy

The high impact on your self-esteem (60%) hints at a possible fragility in your sense of self-efficacy within the online social context: if you depend on external validation (likes, comments) to assess your competence or your worth, every absence of feedback can reinforce self-doubt. Strengthening confidence in your own abilities independently of these external signals could reduce the urge to check.

Sources: Bandura (1997) ; Bandura (1977)

Ellis's ABC model

Your moderate score in compulsive checking (40%) but high scores in comparison (60%) and self-esteem (60%) follow the ABC model: the *Activating event* (seeing a post, an absence of likes) → *Belief* ('I'm not good enough', 'everyone forgets me') → *Consequence* (anxiety, need to check again). It is not the online social event itself that generates the distress, but the interpretation you make of it. Can you identify your automatic beliefs in these moments?

Sources: Ellis (1962) ; Ellis & Harper (1975)

Mindfulness

Your profile suggests possible *fusion* with the thoughts and sensations generated by social media: rather than observing an urge to check or a comparison arise and then pass, you might be absorbed by these thoughts as though they were absolute truths. Cultivating a mindful stance — noticing 'I'm having the thought that I'm not good enough' rather than 'I'm not good enough' — could create a helpful distance and reduce the behavioural urgency.

Sources: Kabat-Zinn (1990) ; Segal, Williams & Teasdale (2002)

These frameworks do not constitute a medical diagnosis.

Your profile, told as a whole

Your relationship with social media isn’t one of volume but of emotional texture. The engine here seems to be the quiet, almost automatic way you compare what you see to your own life—your career, your relationships, your sense of where you should be at 36. That comparison (which registered as your highest dimension) doesn’t just hover; it settles, affecting how you feel about yourself. Interestingly, the checking itself isn’t frantic or out of control, and the fear of missing out is moderate. So the central logic appears to be this: you don’t feel compelled to be on social media all the time, but when you engage, you’re drawn to content that invites you to measure your insides against others’ outsides, and that measurement becomes a subtle filter through which you see your own worth. This means social comparison may act as the organizing dimension—it doesn’t drive the frequency of use, but it shapes the *quality* of your experience and the emotional aftermath. The other scores orbit around it: self-esteem dips because comparison is active; checking stays moderate because you can step away; FOMO is moderate because the emotional cost of staying might temper the fear of missing out. The internal tension this creates is a kind of double-edged connectedness. On one hand, social media likely serves you well as a professional and social tool—you can network, stay informed, maintain ties—and your moderate usage suggests you already have some skills to disengage. On the other hand, the platform becomes a mirror that often reflects back a distorted sense of deficiency. What is made easy: staying in the loop; what is made costly: maintaining a stable, compassionate view of yourself when that loop includes highly curated success stories. This can leave you in a bind: you don’t want to lose the benefits, but each passive scroll can quietly erode your sense of okayness. The cost isn’t dramatic; it’s more like a slow leak of self-acceptance. A plausible history for this equilibrium might involve life contexts where observation and self-measurement were adaptive. Perhaps you grew up in an environment—family, school, early career—where being aware of others’ achievements helped you set your own benchmarks, or where subtle comparison was a way to figure out your own path. At 36, this might be amplified by a life stage where peers are hitting milestones (promotions, partnerships, parenting) that feel like cultural yardsticks. Social comparison may have originally served as a kind of social radar, helping you navigate expectations and position yourself. The fact that it now leans into self-esteem impact could reflect that the radar became overly sensitive, or that the world it monitors has become more filtered and less real. The overall moderation of your profile hints that this pattern hasn’t consumed your life; it’s more like a familiar groove that gets worn down when you’re tired, uncertain, or in transition. An underappreciated resource in your profile is the very moderation of compulsive checking and FOMO. These are not scores of someone who is helplessly tethered to their device; they suggest an innate capacity to pause, to prioritize, to let go of the feed. This capacity is a genuine strength—it means you already have a baseline of self-regulation. That you check moderately despite high comparison suggests you might already have some unconscious strategies to protect yourself (like avoiding certain platforms at certain times). Leaning into this strength could involve making those strategies more intentional, without needing to overhaul who you are. The fact that you’re reading this also shows you have insight and curiosity, which are the very tools that transform a pattern. What might shift first is not your amount of use, but your *awareness in the moment*. A concrete sign that this is moving could be noticing, mid-scroll, the subtle drop in your mood or the beginning of a critical inner voice, and saying to yourself, “That’s the comparison starting, and it’s not a full picture.” The shift isn’t a dramatic exit from social media; it’s a gentle, repeated choice to interrupt the chain between seeing and judging. Another early sign might be that you begin to seek out or create content that connects you to your own values rather than to others’ achievements, and you notice a slightly lighter feeling afterward. These small wins accumulate, not by eliminating comparison (which is human), but by giving your self-esteem a softer landing.

Your dimensions in real life

A score is not lived as a number but as a scene. See if you recognise yours — or set it aside.

Compulsive Checking

It might happen when you're waiting for something, like your morning coffee to brew. You pull out your phone, open a social app almost without thinking, and flick through a few posts. A part of you notes that it's a bit automatic, but the urge doesn't feel urgent—more like filling a small gap. You might scroll for a minute or two, see a notification that isn't important, and then close the app when the coffee is ready. Later, you might not even remember what you saw.

To try: Try a 'pocket pause' this week: next time you feel that automatic reach for your phone during a brief wait, instead place a hand on your device but don't unlock it for 30 seconds. Just notice what the pause feels like in your body. Then, if you still want to check, allow yourself to do so mindfully, noting one thing you actually enjoyed seeing. Notice if the pause changes the experience at all.

Social Comparison

Sometimes you're scrolling during a lunch break and land on a post from an old acquaintance who seems to be thriving—maybe a promotion announcement or a picture of a perfectly styled home office. A heavy feeling might settle in your chest, and a thought like, 'I haven't achieved that kind of success' or 'My life looks messy compared to this' could drift through your mind. You might catch yourself staring at the post longer than you intended, then quickly swipe away only to compare other people's updates. The rest of the afternoon feels slightly heavier.

To try: The next time you notice that comparison kick in, pause and gently ask yourself: 'What am I actually seeing here—a whole life or a chosen moment?' Then, grab a piece of paper and jot down one small thing you did recently that you felt good about, no matter how ordinary. Set the paper beside you as you continue scrolling, and revisit it if the comparison returns. See if it provides a little balance.

FOMO (Fear Of Missing Out)

Maybe it's a Sunday evening and you see a few photos of friends at a casual brunch you couldn't make. A brief pang of 'I should have been there' might surface, accompanied by a quick mental replay of why you declined the invitation. You might scroll to see who else was there, feeling a slight emptiness, but then recall that you needed that morning to rest. The feeling fades within a few minutes, and you move on to other posts.

To try: When you next feel that small FOMO twinge, try a 'reality check': remind yourself of one thing you chose to do instead that was genuinely valuable to you at that time—even if it was just resting. Then, send a quick, authentic message to one person from that group, not about the event, but just to say hi. Notice if that small connection eases the pang.

Impact on Self-Esteem

There may be evenings when you lie in bed, casually scrolling, and you come across a post from someone whose life seems exceptionally put-together—a skincare routine reel, a traveler's perfect beach body, or a peer's career milestone. Suddenly, your inner voice might turn critical: 'Look at them—why can't I be more disciplined/look like that/be that successful?' You might feel a hollowness in your stomach, and even after you lock the phone, the thoughts linger, making it hard to fall asleep because you're replaying your own perceived shortcomings.

To try: The next night before bed, instead of scrolling, try a 'self-appreciation pause': write down one quality you genuinely like about yourself that is not about appearance or productivity—maybe your sense of humor, your loyalty, or how you handled something difficult. Then, if you still choose to scroll, hold that quality in mind like a shield. Observe whether the comparison thoughts bounce off a little more softly. Remember that what you see online is a curated performance, not a mirror.

What this report cannot tell you

The same result allows several readings. Here are the ones that compete with ours.

This questionnaire captures a snapshot of your own perception of your social media use at a given moment—not an objective reality or a permanent trait. Your answers can be influenced by your mood that day, by recent events on social media that were particularly uplifting or painful, or by a desire to present yourself in a certain light (even to yourself). It doesn’t distinguish between social media platforms that may affect you very differently, or between active posting and passive scrolling. The scores also can’t tell us whether the impact on self-esteem comes before or after the comparison—maybe you go online seeking validation when you already feel low. Furthermore, self-report measures can’t reveal deeper motivations or the role social media plays in your life structure, such as its connection to your work or family obligations. Finally, these numbers reflect a particular cultural and temporal context; what counts as ‘moderate’ now might shift with changing norms, and your own relationship with these platforms will evolve as your life does.

Comparison as a Professional Sharpening Tool

Your high social comparison score might reflect not a vulnerability but a strategic adaptation in a competitive professional environment. At 36, many people are in career phases where staying aware of colleagues’ and competitors’ milestones is essential for advancement or inspiration. If you work in a field where networking and personal branding matter, the very act of scrolling can be a form of market research. The self-esteem impact, then, could be a side effect of an otherwise useful vigilance—like a necessary muscle that sometimes gets sore. Rather than an addiction, this could be a rational, if emotionally taxing, engagement with the reality that social media is where professional identities are performed. The moderate checking further supports this: you go in with a purpose, perhaps to see what others are doing, not to endlessly escape.

High Aspiration Masking as Inadequacy

What the questionnaire labels ‘social comparison’ and ‘impact on self-esteem’ might actually be indicators of a highly aspirational mindset. You may have a vivid inner vision of the person you want to become, and when you see others who appear closer to that vision, the contrast stings—not because you’re deeply insecure, but because your standards are high and deeply felt. In this reading, the discomfort is a signal of ambition, not deficiency. The moderate FOMO makes sense: you’re not afraid of missing any random event, but of missing cues that could help you grow. This reframe doesn’t dismiss the pain, but it places it within a story of striving rather than failing, and suggests that the solution lies in directing that aspiration toward self-compassionate goals, not in lowering your sights.

A Sensitive and Self-Reflective Nature

Your scores could also be explained by a personality trait: high emotional sensitivity or a reflective, self-critical thinking style. People who are deeply introspective often feel the emotional weight of social information more acutely; they process what they see in others as personal data about themselves. Your self-esteem impact score may be elevated not because you compare more than others, but because you feel that comparison more thoroughly. This sensitivity is also a strength—it likely makes you empathetic and thoughtful in relationships off-screen. The moderate compulsive checking and FOMO indicate that you are not driven by a shallow need for stimulation but by a genuine engagement with the human stories you encounter. The challenge, then, isn’t the depth of your reaction, but finding ways to protect your inner world from the relentless highlight reel.

Platform Design, Not Personal Weakness

It’s important to consider that the high social comparison and self-esteem scores may largely reflect the environment you’re navigating, not an internal flaw. Contemporary platforms are engineered to surface exactly the content that triggers comparison—visual, curated, achievement-oriented—because that drives engagement. Your brain’s response to these cues is normal and shared by millions. The moderate FOMO and checking scores suggest you might actually be less hooked than average; the problem is that when you do show up, you walk into a hall of mirrors designed to make anyone feel less than. In this view, the primary intervention isn’t to fix you but to reshape your environment: curate feeds ruthlessly, follow accounts that expand your definition of success, or use tools to hide metrics. Your vulnerability is not personal weakness; it’s humanity meeting a supernormal stimulus.

Questions to keep exploring

To write about on your own, or to bring to a professional.

  • When you catch yourself in a moment of social comparison on social media, what is the specific theme that stings the most—career success, physical appearance, relationships, or something else? How might that theme connect to a value or expectation you’ve held for yourself since before social media existed in your life?
  • Think back to a time when you left social media feeling curious or energized rather than diminished. What were you looking at, and what mindset were you in before you opened the app? What can that memory tell you about the conditions under which social media actually serves you well?
  • How does the drop in self-esteem typically show up for you after a session—is it a vague sense of not-enough, a critical inner voice, a desire to hide certain parts of your life, or something else? Where in your body or your day do you notice its residue?
  • If your social media use is moderate but the emotional impact is high, what need or desire might be keeping you engaged despite the cost? For example, does it fill a quiet moment of loneliness, offer a break from a demanding task, or satisfy a hunger for novelty?
  • You have a notable ability to keep the checking in check—to not open the app compulsively. What strategies have you already been using, perhaps without giving yourself credit, to set those boundaries? How could you do more of what’s already working, or apply it to the quality of what you consume?
  • Consider the people you follow: among them, who makes you feel smaller and who makes you feel possible? If you were to redesign your feed to be a record of your own growth rather than a comparison chamber, what would you unfollow first, and what would you add more of?
  • If a friend came to you with exactly your scores—high comparison, high self-esteem impact, moderate everything else—what would you gently encourage them to notice about their pattern, and what permission would you give them? How does that advice compare to the way you speak to yourself about your own use?
  • Looking ahead, what is one small, almost imperceptible shift in your day after a social media session that would signal your self-esteem is becoming less tied to what you see? It might be a quicker recovery, a lighter self-observation, or a spontaneous laugh at your own inner critic. What would you look for?

Reference frameworks and authors

To help you situate this report, here are the references specific to this test.

  • DSM-5 — Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (American Psychiatric Association, 2013)
  • ICD-11 — International Classification of Diseases, 11th Revision (World Health Organization, 2022)
  • inspired by Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale (BSMAS) (Andreassen, Torsheim, Brunborg & Pallesen, 2012)
  • Components model of behavioral addiction (Griffiths, 2005)
  • inspired by Smartphone Addiction Scale (SAS) (Kwon, Lee, Won, Park, Min, Hahn, Gu, Choi & Kim, 2013)

Resources & exercise

7-day observation journal

Each day, spot one situation where “Social Comparison” showed up. Note the automatic thought, the emotion (0–100) and what you did. Then write one more balanced, alternative reading. After 7 days, re-read your notes: the recurring patterns become visible — the first step to change them.

Support resources

If you are struggling, you are not alone. United States: call or text 988 (Suicide & Crisis Lifeline, 24/7). Elsewhere: find your local line at findahelpline.com. This report supports self-knowledge and does not replace a consultation with a psychologist or doctor.

Find a professional

To go further, working with a professional is valuable. A few trusted directories to find a practitioner near you:

Tip: prioritise licensed/registered professionals and evidence-based therapies (e.g. CBT).

How this report is produced

This report is generated by artificial intelligence from your answers only, structured around recognised clinical models (attachment theory, CBT, Young’s schemas…) cited within the report. No health professional is involved in writing it. It is a self-knowledge tool, not a diagnosis: the analyses are avenues for understanding to weigh against your own experience, and do not replace the assessment of a health professional.

Your answers in detail

1. I check social media as soon as I wake up, before any other activity.

Answer : Rarely

You answered "Rarely". Can you tell me more about when this comes up for you?

It mainly shows up in situations that matter to me, when I feel under pressure or emotionally involved.

2. I automatically open a social media app when I unlock my phone.

Answer : Rarely

And how long have you noticed this?

It has been more present over the past few months, though I recognise it from before too.

3. I spend more than an hour a day scrolling through feeds.

Answer : Rarely

4. I interrupt conversations or activities to check my notifications.

Answer : Rarely

5. I check social media during meals, while commuting, or while waiting.

Answer : Rarely

6. I find it hard to put down my phone at night because of social media.

Answer : Rarely

7. …

The next questions (7, 8…) continue in your test. This sample only shows the beginning — the full test has 64 questions, and every answer refines your report.

What now?

You've just seen what your answers reveal. Your Full Assessment goes further: a personalized, step-by-step path to turn this understanding into concrete change — at your own pace.

Get YOUR Social Media Addiction Test (Instagram, TikTok) report

Answer the 64 questions, then unlock your full report: interpretation, 11 clinical reading frameworks, recommendations and PDF — from €2.99.

← Back to the test page

Join our exchange group

A caring, application-based space for exchange on WhatsApp — not therapy.

Join the Community (waiting list)

A doubt about a real relationship?

Decode your actual conversation, message by message.

Analyze →