Skip to main content
AI Assistant ScanMyLove
📄 Sample report — illustrative profile (fictional persona). Your real report is assessed from YOUR answers after the test.

Hello Emma,

Overall result

Moderate attentional difficulties

This illustrative profile describes attentional difficulties of notable intensity: very pronounced distractibility and organisational struggles that weigh on daily life. This is not a diagnosis — only a professional can diagnose ADHD — but the recognition of a way of functioning where managing attention and organising action are put to the test. The common thread is a weakness in the executive functions, which has nothing to do with a lack of intelligence or willpower. The most effective lever is to compensate through your environment and external systems (reducing distractions, lists, routines, breaking things into steps) rather than relying on effort alone, which is exhausting. If these difficulties have a real and lasting impact, a specialist assessment is the right step: once identified, ADHD benefits from support (accommodations, therapy, sometimes medication) that concretely changes everyday life.

Your profile at a glance

SustainedattentionSelectiveattentionDistractibilityOrganisation

Detailed analysis

Sustained attentionVery High

This tendency is clear in you — here is what it reveals, to understand and move forward.

Your difficulties with sustained attention are severe and strongly affect your ability to function day to day.

Your answers describe a very pronounced trait on sustained attention. This level of intensity indicates that the dimension holds a central place in how you currently function, probably with a notable impact on daily life (sleep, relationships, motivation, decision-making). The mechanisms typical of this level — a sense of being overwhelmed, a gradual loss of grip on the situation, withdrawal or isolation — can make it hard to step out of this dynamic on your own. It's important to remember that a very high score on a questionnaire is not a diagnosis and says nothing about your worth or your ability to feel better: it signals an intensity — that is, a need for support — not an inevitability. Many people who recognise themselves in this level find lasting relief once they are supported, because what feels insurmountable alone often becomes manageable with someone else. This is precisely the level at which support from a mental health professional (psychologist, psychiatrist, family doctor) is most useful: to set a framework, identify what keeps the dimension going, and build a strategy suited to you. If you feel significant distress or thoughts that are hard to carry, don't hesitate to contact one of the helplines listed at the end of this report.

Recommendations

  • Consult a specialist to assess possible inattentive-type ADHD.
  • Set up specialist support (cognitive remediation).
  • Discuss with your doctor the treatment options suited to your situation.
Selective attentionHigh

This tendency is clear in you — here is what it reveals, to understand and move forward.

The ability to direct and maintain attention on relevant information while ignoring irrelevant stimuli.

Your answers describe a marked trait on selective attention. At this level, the dimension can sustain itself through self-reinforcing mechanisms (avoidance, narrowing of attention, or rumination), whose exact form depends on the dimension involved. This trait typically shows up across several everyday contexts, not only in exceptional situations. Understanding the self-reinforcing mechanism is often the key: for example, avoiding a situation brings short-term relief but confirms to the brain that it was dangerous, which strengthens avoidance the next time. Spotting this kind of loop in your own daily life — without judging yourself — is already a lever for change, because you can only act on what you have first identified. It can interact with other elevated dimensions of the profile — for instance by worsening the feeling of overload or limiting the resources available to cope with it. It may help to talk it over with a professional (psychologist, doctor) to explore in more detail what is at play and identify levers for action; structured approaches such as cognitive behavioural therapies work precisely on these chains, through small, concrete and realistic steps rather than willpower alone.

DistractibilityVery High

This tendency is clear in you — here is what it reveals, to understand and move forward.

Your distractibility is very pronounced and constitutes a major obstacle to your daily functioning.

Your very high score describes very pronounced distractibility, which constitutes a major obstacle to daily functioning. Without judgement, distractibility is not a lack of willpower: in ADHD-type functioning, the attentional filter lets through more stimuli, so attention is captured by anything that comes up (a noise, a thought, a notification), at the expense of the task at hand. One way of reading this, to weigh against your own experience, is that the effort to 'concentrate harder' often fails and exhausts you, because the problem isn't the amount of effort but the way attention is managed. The very high nature of the score deserves to be taken seriously. The most effective lever is to act on the environment rather than on willpower alone: reduce sources of distraction (a clear space, notifications off, headphones), offload memory (lists, reminders), and break tasks into short sequences. If the impact is this marked, an assessment with an ADHD professional is clearly warranted — this test is a screening, not a diagnosis.

Recommendations

  • Have a full neuropsychological assessment carried out.
  • Explore possible treatments with a specialist psychiatrist.
  • Set up structured daily support with reminders and routines.
OrganisationHigh

This tendency is clear in you — here is what it reveals, to understand and move forward.

The ability to structure your activities, manage your affairs and keep an orderly living environment.

Your high score describes difficulties structuring your activities, managing your affairs and keeping an orderly living environment. Without judgement, these organisational difficulties are one of the most frequent and most disabling manifestations of ADHD-type functioning: they reflect neither laziness nor a lack of goodwill, but a weakness in the executive functions that plan and order action. One way of reading this, to weigh against your own experience, is that the gap between intention ('I'm going to get organised') and follow-through can generate a great deal of frustration and guilt, often unfair. The high nature of the score deserves attention. The lever is not to 'try harder' but to lean on external systems that compensate: diaries, lists, fixed routines, tidying by habit rather than by decision, breaking large tasks down. And if these difficulties weigh on you over time, talking to an ADHD professional makes it possible to consider tailored support.

Profile synthesis

Your profile shows moderate manifestations. Some dimensions deserve attention without being alarming: they describe real but contained difficulties, which don't yet sit at the centre of how you function. The moderate level is precisely the one where observation is most useful, because it can shift in either direction depending on what is happening in your life. Spotting the contexts and moments when these dimensions intensify — fatigue, conflict, overload, isolation — gives you concrete levers to act early. Talking it over with someone you trust or a professional, even without any urgency, can help clarify what is at play and prevent things worsening through accumulation.

How your dimensions interact

Several dimensions show high scores at the same time (Sustained attention, Selective attention, Distractibility, Organisation). These dimensions don't operate in isolation: they can reinforce one another, each feeding the others in a loop that makes the overall picture heavier than the sum of its parts. The good news about this mechanism is that it also works the other way round: focused work on one of them, often the most accessible or the most overwhelming, can have positive knock-on effects on the others. This is exactly the kind of link a professional can help untangle, so you can choose where to start rather than tackling everything at once.

Your action plan

Right now

  • Selective attention — Observe in which situations this dimension shows up most intensely, and note the triggers (context, emotion, intensity).
  • Selective attention — Identify a professional (psychologist, family doctor) with whom to address this dimension. Booking a first appointment is an immediate action, not a therapeutic commitment.
  • Organisation — Observe in which situations this dimension shows up most intensely, and note the triggers (context, emotion, intensity).
  • Organisation — Identify a professional (psychologist, family doctor) with whom to address this dimension. Booking a first appointment is an immediate action, not a therapeutic commitment.
  • Sustained attention — Consult a specialist to assess possible inattentive-type ADHD.
  • Sustained attention — Set up specialist support (cognitive remediation).
  • Distractibility — Have a full neuropsychological assessment carried out.
  • Distractibility — Explore possible treatments with a specialist psychiatrist.

In the coming weeks

  • Maintain a regular therapeutic framework (spaced consultations, medical follow-up) to work on this dimension over time.

In the long run

  • Retake this test in 3 to 6 months to measure your progress. Significant changes on the elevated dimensions are often visible over this timescale.
  • If you start therapeutic work, identify together 1 to 2 priority dimensions rather than tackling everything at once — focused work is more effective than broad work.
  • Build a lasting support network: a health professional (psychologist, psychiatrist, family doctor), people around you, possibly a support group. Strength comes from numbers and complementarity.
  • Take care of the physiological basics (sleep, nutrition, physical activity): they don't cure but they strongly shape how mentally available you are for therapeutic work.

Avenues to explore

These are hypotheses, not conclusions. You are the one who knows whether they resonate.

It may be that you experience a particular kind of attentional fatigue during tasks that require prolonged concentration. Some people with this profile report that holding their focus becomes gradually harder over time, even on activities that interest them.

Check for yourself: Over a week, observe your ability to concentrate over different durations: can you stay focused for 15 minutes? 30 minutes? At what point do you feel your attention 'slip away'? Note whether this fatigue is present every day or only in certain contexts (noise, lighting, a tedious task).

One possible explanation would be that you have a better ability to filter essential information (decent selective attention), but that your external environment (noises, movements, notifications) interferes strongly with your concentration. You might be particularly sensitive to disruptive stimulation.

Check for yourself: Deliberately test two different settings over 1-2 weeks: work first in a very quiet, controlled environment, then in an environment with distractions (background noise, people passing by). Do your productivity and your fatigue change radically? If so, that's an indicator that the environment plays a major role.

In some people, this profile comes with difficulty prioritising or planning the steps of a complex task, even though they can stay attentive once they've started. Ask yourself: is it the organisation of the work itself that's the problem, or rather maintaining attention?

Check for yourself: Think back to your recent concrete obstacles: do you forget the steps, or do you know what needs doing but find it hard to stay focused enough to do it? Try an experiment: plan a task very precisely on paper (each micro-step), then carry it out. Does that make things easier?

It is possible that your distractibility is selective: certain types of disturbance (auditory, visual, or linked to your personal concerns) affect you far more than others. That would mean you do have an attentional capacity, but that it is quickly destabilised by certain specific stimuli.

Check for yourself: Over 10 days, note precisely what actually distracts you: is it more the noises, the intrusive thoughts, the visual stimulation, or emotional concerns? Do you see a pattern? Are some distractions more powerful than others for you?

12 clinical reading frameworks are applied to your profile below — the exact number announced for this test.

Reading frameworks

Recognised clinical frameworks applied to your profile, as additional perspectives to weigh.

Nervous system stateSympathetic/Partial mobilisation

The very high distractibility (40%) and the difficulties with sustained concentration suggest a nervous system in a state of selective hypervigilance: the person can switch rapidly between focus and dispersion, the signature of poorly regulated sympathetic activation. This instability hampers the ability to maintain a state of focused calm (ventral).

Cognitive patternCatastrophising

The sustained attention difficulties (40%) can fuel an amplified interpretation of one's own cognitive 'failings', particularly in a work or school setting where attention is valued. This distortion risks reinforcing a negative self-perception beyond the actual lived reality.

Cognitive patternAll-or-nothing thinking

With selective attention at 60% and organisation at 60%, the person could swing between 'I'm succeeding' and 'I'm completely lost', without acknowledging the nuance of partial competence. This binary rigidity amplifies frustration in the face of attentional fluctuations.

Early schemaDefectiveness / Shame

An overall score of 50% combined with very strong distractibility (40%) and severely compromised sustained attention (40%) can crystallise an internal sense of inadequacy. The defectiveness schema feeds particularly on this perceived gap between effort and attentional outcome.

Cognitive distortions — Sources: Aaron Beck (1976) ; David Burns (1980)

Young's schemas — Sources: Jeffrey Young (1990) ; Jeffrey Young, Janet Klosko, Marjorie Weishaar (2003)

Polyvagal theory — Sources: Stephen Porges (2011) ; Stephen Porges (1995) — proposed/debated theory

Additional clinical frameworks

Recognised models for this domain, applied to your profile as hypotheses to weigh — not a diagnosis.

ADHD / executive function models

DSM-5-TR criteria (ADHD)

Your profile shows pronounced difficulties in sustained attention and distractibility (40% for both), which match key elements of inattention as defined by the DSM-5-TR. You may recognise situations where holding your focus on a long task becomes particularly costly, or where external stimuli disrupt your concentration — is that your everyday experience? These observations could shed light on how attentional difficulties show up in different contexts of your life.

Sources: American Psychiatric Association (2022)

Brown's model (6 clusters)

Your high score on distractibility combined with fragile sustained attention (40%) suggests a possible difficulty in the 'focus' cluster of Brown's model: the ability to initiate and maintain attention despite interference. This profile sometimes points to an increased permeability to surrounding stimuli, which makes the deliberate 'selection' of the relevant signal harder. Do you recognise this experience of attention being 'porous' to distractions?

Sources: Thomas E. Brown (2005) ; Thomas E. Brown (2013)

Sluggish cognitive tempo (SCT/CDS)

Your very reduced sustained attention (40%) could also point to a form of cognitive disengagement: rather than outward restlessness, you may feel a kind of 'attentional emptiness' or zoning out, especially on tasks that demand prolonged effort. Unlike noisy hyperactivity, this profile can come with a certain slowness to 'restart' after a loss of concentration. Does that resonate with your experience?

Sources: Stephen Becker et al. (2016)

Barkley's model

Your high distractibility (40%) and your sustained attention difficulties (40%) could reflect a deficit in behavioural inhibition: you may struggle to 'block' irrelevant stimuli or to delay a reaction before selecting the appropriate response. According to Barkley, this would secondarily disrupt working memory and planning. Do you feel that you often react before having 'filtered' the information?

Sources: Russell Barkley (1997) ; Russell Barkley (1997)

Transversal reading frameworks

Window of tolerance (Siegel)

The moderate attentional difficulties you describe — particularly this very weakened sustained attention and marked distractibility — can point to an instability in the 'window of tolerance', that zone where nervous-system activation stays optimal. You may swing between moments of hypoactivation (where attention 'slips away') and spikes of distraction (sensory overload), making it hard to maintain stable concentration. Do you notice this alternation, or rather a constant difficulty in 'staying in it'?

Emotion regulation (Gross)

The high distractibility and fragile selective attention suggest a possible difficulty in applying attentional regulation strategies — notably cognitive reappraisal, which requires sustained focus on the meaning of situations. When faced with disruptive stimuli or intrusive thoughts, you may tend to let yourself be 'carried off' rather than actively redirecting your attention. Do you recognise this dynamic in how you relate to emotional distractions?

Psychological flexibility (ACT, Hayes)

Profiles with compromised selective attention often report difficulty maintaining commitment to long-term values, because each distraction interrupts the action. You may experience a form of indirect experiential avoidance: rather than accepting the discomfort of concentration, attention 'flees' towards less demanding stimuli. Can you identify the actions or projects you would like to pursue despite the attentional difficulty?

Self-compassion (Neff)

Moderate attentional deficits often come with intense self-criticism — frustration at the 'inability' to concentrate, a sense of isolation ('why can others do it and not me?'). You may be particularly hard on yourself on this point. A stance of self-compassion — recognising that this challenge is shared, that it doesn't define you — could ease the emotional load and, paradoxically, improve attentional stability. Do you recognise yourself in this self-criticism?

These frameworks do not constitute a medical diagnosis.

Resources & exercise

7-day observation journal

Each day, spot one situation where “Selective attention” showed up. Note the automatic thought, the emotion (0–100) and what you did. Then write one more balanced, alternative reading. After 7 days, re-read your notes: the recurring patterns become visible — the first step to change them.

Support resources

If you are struggling, you are not alone. United States: call or text 988 (Suicide & Crisis Lifeline, 24/7). Elsewhere: find your local line at findahelpline.com. This report supports self-knowledge and does not replace a consultation with a psychologist or doctor.

Your answers in detail

1. How often do you find it hard to stay focused for more than 15 minutes on a single task?

Answer : Rarely

You answered 'Rarely'. Could you tell me a bit more about the moments when this comes up?

It mostly comes out in situations that matter to me, when I feel under pressure or emotionally involved.

2. Do you ever 'tune out' mentally in the middle of a conversation or while reading?

Answer : Rarely

And how long have you been noticing this?

It's been more present for a few months, even though I recognise it from before as well.

3. Do you need to reread a text several times to grasp its meaning?

Answer : Rarely

4. How often does your attention fluctuate during a single activity, with moments of going 'blank'?

Answer : Rarely

5. Do you feel quick mental fatigue when you have to concentrate on a demanding task?

Answer : Rarely

6. Do you find it hard to stay alert during monotonous or repetitive tasks?

Answer : Rarely

7. …

The next questions (7, 8…) continue in your test. This sample only shows the beginning — the full test has 60 questions, and every answer refines your report.

What now?

You've just seen what your answers reveal. Your Full Assessment goes further: a personalized, step-by-step path to turn this understanding into concrete change — at your own pace.

Get YOUR Attention Deficit report

Answer the 60 questions, then unlock your full report: interpretation, 11 clinical reading frameworks, recommendations and PDF — from 1.99 €.

← Back to the test page