Skip to main content
Psy AssistantExplore, understand, move forwardScanMyLoveDecode your relationship
📄 Sample report — illustrative profile (fictional persona). Your real report is assessed from YOUR answers after the test.

Hello Emma,

Profile synthesis

Your profile presents a moderate overall level of obsessive and compulsive symptomatology (50%), yet the distribution reveals a clinically meaningful pattern: while your intrusive thoughts, checking, doubt, and rumination are mild, your compulsions, contamination fears, taboo thoughts, perfectionism, and functional distress are all marked (60%). This suggests that the maintenance of your OCD is driven less by obsessive thinking itself and more by behavioural and emotional avoidance—the rituals, the contamination-driven safety behaviours, the perfectionist rigidity, and the shame-fuelled withdrawal from the intrusive thoughts. At 36, you are navigating professional and relational demands while managing this distress; the marked functional impact indicates that your OCD is no longer a background noise but an active constraint on your quality of life, affecting time allocation, emotional freedom, and possibly relationships. One central pattern worth noting: your marked compulsions and contamination fears likely reinforce one another through a cycle in which washing and avoidance temporarily reduce contamination anxiety, but they strengthen the underlying belief that contamination is genuinely dangerous, perpetuating both the fear and the ritual. Similarly, your perfectionism may fuel contamination fears (by setting impossibly high cleanliness standards) and amplify distress around taboo thoughts (by generating shame about having 'imperfect' or morally unacceptable thoughts). The silver lining is that your mild rumination, mild obsessions, and mild doubt suggest you retain significant cognitive flexibility and capacity for decision-making outside OCD domains—strengths that you can leverage in therapy. Your functional distress, though painful, is also clinically meaningful because it motivates engagement in treatment and because OCD-focused CBT with exposure and response prevention (ERP) is highly effective for this exact profile: compulsion-driven, emotionally avoidant, perfectionist, and contamination-focused OCD responds powerfully to structured therapeutic intervention. Recovery is not only possible but probable with appropriate support.

Overall result

Moderate obsessive symptoms

Your answers suggest a moderate obsessive-compulsive profile (50%). Certain dimensions — which may include thought-action fusion, perfectionism, mental neutralizations or reassurance behaviors — manifest recurrently enough to weigh on your psychic comfort. This picture, without necessarily reaching the diagnostic thresholds of DSM-5 or ICD-11, indicates obsessional tendencies that deserve targeted work. The good news is that this level responds well to strategies drawn from cognitive-behavioral approaches, in particular work on obsessional beliefs and tolerance of uncertainty.

Your profile at a glance

Obsessions &intrusive thoughtsCompulsions &ritualsCheckingContamination &washingOrder, symmetry& exactnessTaboo thoughtsDoubt & need forcertaintyPerfectionism &rigidityMentalruminationDistress &functional impact

Detailed analysis

Obsessions & intrusive thoughtsMild obsessions

This tendency is present in you — here is what it sheds light on.

Intrusive, recurrent and unwanted thoughts, images or urges that force themselves in and generate anxiety.

Your answers suggest a moderate level of obsessional thoughts (40%), characterized by recurrent yet still manageable mental intrusions. These thoughts seem to occur occasionally, generating passing discomfort without paralyzing your daily functioning. Based on reference criteria such as DSM-5 and ICD-11, this profile deserves attention without constituting a severe picture. Clinical psychology research emphasizes that the tendency to fight or neutralize intrusive thoughts can paradoxically increase their frequency, a phenomenon known as the cognitive rebound effect.

Recommendations

  • You could practice cognitive defusion drawn from recognized approaches such as CBT, learning to observe your thoughts as mere passing mental events with no prescriptive value.
  • You could actively remind your mind that the appearance of an intrusive thought reflects neither a real intention nor a genuine desire, something clinical psychology research clearly confirms.
  • You could keep a structured obsession journal to identify specific triggering contexts and to assess how their frequency and intensity evolve over time.
  • You could consider a one-off consultation with a psychologist in order to evaluate whether these thoughts warrant structured work before they settle more deeply into your functioning.
Compulsions & ritualsMarked compulsions

This tendency is clear in you — here is what it reveals, to understand and move forward.

Repeated acts or mental rituals performed to reduce the anxiety linked to obsessions, according to rigid rules.

Your answers suggest a high level of compulsive behaviors (60%), characterized by frequent rituals that are time-consuming and draining of mental and physical energy. This profile indicates that compulsions probably occupy a significant place in your days, interfering with your activities, your relationships and your well-being. According to reference criteria such as DSM-5 and ICD-11, this picture corresponds to clinically significant compulsive symptomatology. Clinical psychology research confirms that the more compulsions are performed, the more they reinforce the belief in their necessity, making stopping them progressively harder without structured help.

Recommendations

  • You could consult a specialized mental health professional in order to begin structured work based on recognized approaches such as CBT with exposure and response prevention (ERP), the reference treatment according to DSM-5 and ICD-11 criteria.
  • You could start mapping your compulsive rituals by noting their frequency, duration and triggering context, which is an essential preparatory step for any effective therapeutic support.
  • You could engage in a first guided exposure experience, choosing a slightly anxiety-provoking situation and resisting the associated compulsion, in order to observe that anxiety self-regulates.
  • You could inform a trusted person of your current difficulties, because clinical psychology research shows that suitable social support plays a facilitating role in engaging in and maintaining a therapeutic process.
CheckingMild checking

This tendency is present in you — here is what it sheds light on.

A need to check repeatedly (doors, gas, devices, messages) out of fear of a disaster or a mistake.

Your answers suggest a moderate level of checking behaviors (40%), characterized by recurrent doubt that leads you to check your actions occasionally but regularly. This profile indicates that checks, though still manageable, generate a loss of time and a slight erosion of confidence in your own judgment. According to reference criteria such as DSM-5 and ICD-11, this picture deserves attention. Clinical psychology research emphasizes that each additional check reinforces doubt rather than resolving it, feeding a cycle that becomes progressively hard to interrupt without a targeted strategy.

Recommendations

  • You could train yourself to limit each checking behavior to a single conscious and deliberate occurrence, explicitly naming the doubt as an anxiety signal rather than reliable information about reality.
  • You could keep a daily record of your checks, noting the context and the anxiety felt before and after, in order to become aware of their real effect on your sense of security in the short and long term.
  • You could experiment with resisting a habitual check in a low-stakes context, observing that anxiety decreases on its own, which recognized approaches such as CBT call natural habituation.
  • You could consider a one-off consultation with a mental health professional to assess whether these checks fit into a broader picture warranting structured support before possible worsening.
Contamination & washingMarked fear

This tendency is clear in you — here is what it reveals, to understand and move forward.

Fear of dirt, germs or contamination, with excessive washing or cleaning and avoidance.

Your answers suggest a marked fear of contamination (60%), with washing, decontamination or avoidance that occupy a significant space in your daily life. According to reference criteria such as DSM-5 and ICD-11, this level corresponds to real functional interference: activities, places or interactions are probably restricted to limit perceived exposure. The obsessional dynamic is clearly visible here: the compulsion relieves temporarily but durably reinforces the fear. Recognized approaches such as CBT with exposure and response prevention (ERP) show solid effectiveness on this profile. Your answers suggest that structured support would be particularly beneficial.

Recommendations

  • You could begin practicing graduated exposures — touching an object perceived as contaminating without washing afterward — starting with the situations that are least anxiety-provoking for you, in order to gradually desensitize the fear response.
  • You could note each day the number of rituals performed and their cumulative duration, because this awareness already constitutes a first lever for change even before any formal intervention.
  • You could consult a psychologist or psychotherapist trained in CBT and OCD, because ERP approaches are specifically designed for this type of fear and offer well-documented results even at this level of intensity.
  • You could inform a trusted person of what you are going through, not to seek reassurance, but to benefit from kind support during the period in which you work to reduce these behaviors.
Order, symmetry & exactnessMild need

This tendency is present in you — here is what it sheds light on.

A need for things to be aligned, symmetrical or "just right", with intense discomfort when things are out of place.

Your answers suggest a slightly elevated need for order and symmetry (40%), manifesting as tension when objects, arrangements or layouts deviate from an internal standard. This level corresponds to a zone of vigilance: the corrections made are still manageable but occupy notable attention. In terms of clinical screening, one observes the early signs of the phenomenon known as sensory phenomena — that sensation of "not quite right" that precedes the compulsion. Recognized approaches such as CBT suggest that interrupting the correction-relief-reinforcement cycle early prevents escalation. Your answers invite you to experiment with tolerating asymmetry gradually.

Recommendations

  • You could deliberately leave an object slightly crooked or an arrangement imperfect and observe, without intervening, that the uncomfortable tension eventually decreases on its own after a few minutes.
  • You could practice this type of short exposure in spaces that matter little to you (a secondary shelf, a slightly poorly folded garment), before gradually extending it to more emotionally charged areas.
  • You could take into account the daily time devoted to corrections and adjustments: if this time exceeds an hour or begins to delay your activities, it constitutes a signal warranting professional attention.
  • You could consult a mental health professional if you notice that this need intensifies during periods of emotional load, in order to obtain suitable tools before the pattern consolidates.
Taboo thoughtsMarked taboo thoughts

This tendency is clear in you — here is what it reveals, to understand and move forward.

Intrusive thoughts with aggressive, sexual or blasphemous content, experienced as shameful and contrary to one's values.

Your answers suggest a marked presence of intrusive thoughts with taboo content (60%), accompanied by notable emotional distress — shame, guilt, self-disgust or fear of being "bad." According to reference criteria such as DSM-5 and ICD-11, this profile corresponds to the subtype known as "pure intrusive-thought OCD" or "intrusive thoughts OCD," often misunderstood and a source of isolated suffering. The central feature here is the radical gap between the content of the thoughts and the person's deep values: this gap is itself the distinctive sign of the symptom. Recognized approaches such as CBT have demonstrated strong effectiveness on this profile. Your answers clearly suggest the importance of professional support.

Recommendations

  • You could consult a mental health professional trained in OCD, describing precisely the type of thoughts you experience: this subtype is well known, well understood and very accessible to therapies such as CBT with ERP or ACT.
  • You could remind yourself that the suffering these thoughts generate is precisely the proof that they are symptoms of an anxiety disorder and not the reflection of your real intentions, desires or values.
  • You could avoid seeking reassurance from your loved ones by asking whether you are "a good person": although humanly understandable, this reassurance perpetuates the obsessional cycle and intensifies distress in the medium term.
  • You could, while awaiting follow-up, practice non-response to intrusive thoughts — observing them without analyzing, neutralizing or fleeing — as a first strategy for disengaging from the obsessional cycle, ideally guided by a professional.
Doubt & need for certaintyMild doubt

This tendency is present in you — here is what it sheds light on.

Permanent pathological doubt, intolerance of uncertainty and a need to be absolutely sure before acting.

Your answers suggest a slightly elevated need for certainty (40%). In the register of psychological screening, this profile corresponds to moments when uncertainty generates slight tension that can prompt checking, seeking confirmation or delaying a decision until more assurance is obtained. These mechanisms remain manageable at this stage, but deserve attention because, according to reference criteria such as DSM-5 and ICD-11, intolerance of uncertainty is recognized as a transdiagnostic factor involved in OCD, generalized anxiety and other anxiety disorders. Working on this point preventively can prevent an escalation toward more invasive checking rituals.

Recommendations

  • You could deliberately train yourself to close a decision as soon as you have "enough" information, without waiting for total certainty, in order to strengthen this tolerance threshold.
  • You could spot the situations in which you seek external reassurance and try, gradually, to refrain from it in order to observe that anxiety dissipates on its own.
  • You could explore light exposure exercises to everyday uncertainty — choosing a restaurant without reading all the reviews, for example — to broaden your comfort zone.
  • You could keep a logbook of your decisions made under uncertainty and note retrospectively that the anticipated catastrophes generally did not occur.
Perfectionism & rigidityMarked perfectionism

This tendency is clear in you — here is what it reveals, to understand and move forward.

Excessive demand for perfection, rigidity of personal rules and difficulty tolerating error or "good enough".

Your answers suggest marked rigid perfectionism (60%), with a notable impact on your time, your energy and probably your relationship with error. This profile evokes inflexible standards, severe self-criticism when results do not reach the expected level, and difficulty considering a task finished. According to reference criteria such as DSM-5 and ICD-11, rigid perfectionism is a central transdiagnostic factor, strongly involved in OCD, anxiety disorders and mood disorders. Recognized approaches such as CBT have developed specific protocols targeting dysfunctional perfectionist beliefs with documented clinical effectiveness.

Recommendations

  • You could work on identifying your core perfectionist beliefs — of the type "if it's not perfect, it's a failure" — in order to question them using tools drawn from recognized approaches such as CBT.
  • You could train yourself to deliberately submit "good enough" work in low-stakes contexts, in order to gradually break the link between imperfection and danger.
  • You could explore recognized approaches such as CBT, which offer structured techniques to soften rigid standards and reduce the chronic self-criticism associated with them.
  • You could consider a consultation with a mental health professional to assess to what extent this rigid perfectionism affects your quality of life and to explore suitable support.
Mental ruminationMild rumination

This tendency is present in you — here is what it sheds light on.

Repetitive, unproductive thinking: dwelling, endless mental analysis and trying to "solve everything" in your head.

Your answers suggest a moderate level of rumination (40%). This profile evokes episodes of repetitive thoughts centered on past or future concerns, generally manageable but present in a notable way. Clinically, rumination is distinguished from productive reflection by its cyclical nature, its lack of resolution and its focus on the problem itself rather than on solutions. According to reference criteria such as DSM-5 and ICD-11, it constitutes a transdiagnostic factor involved in obsessional, depressive and anxious dynamics. At this stage, simple behavioral and cognitive strategies can make it possible to effectively interrupt the loops before they intensify.

Recommendations

  • You could practice the "dedicated rumination time" technique: allocate a short, bounded slot to dwell on things, then deliberately interrupt outside this slot if the thoughts return.
  • You could identify a personal sensory anchor — smell, texture, sound — that allows you to quickly return to the present moment and cut off the ongoing ruminative loop.
  • You could train yourself to distinguish, during a ruminative episode, whether the thought brings new information or goes in circles, and consciously interrupt as soon as the cycle is identified.
  • You could explore recognized approaches such as mindfulness, whose effectiveness on reducing moderate rumination is supported by clinical psychology research.
Distress & functional impactMarked impact

This tendency is clear in you — here is what it reveals, to understand and move forward.

Suffering linked to symptoms and the impact on time, work, relationships and quality of life.

Your answers suggest a marked functional impact (60%): your daily time, your interpersonal relationships and your freedom of action seem notably affected by invasive thoughts or repetitive behaviors. This level corresponds to a clinically significant repercussion according to reference criteria such as DSM-5 and ICD-11, indicating that the suffering exceeds the threshold of ordinary discomfort. Quality of life is probably reduced, with a real psychic, social or professional cost. Care suited to this stage is generally effective and can significantly ease this repercussion within reasonable timeframes.

Recommendations

  • You could consult a mental health professional trained in obsessional disorders in order to obtain a precise clinical evaluation and therapeutic support suited to your specific situation.
  • You could learn about cognitive-behavioral therapies with exposure and response prevention, recognized as reference approaches to reduce this type of functional repercussion.
  • You could identify the areas of life most impacted — work, relationships, leisure — and mention them explicitly at a first consultation to effectively guide the support.
  • You could inform a trusted person of your current difficulties, not to delegate the management of rituals to them, but to benefit from emotional support that lightens the weight of this experience.

How your dimensions interact

Your profile exhibits a clear reinforcement loop across several marked dimensions that maintain each other. Marked compulsions (60%) and contamination fears (60%) form a bidirectional cycle: contamination anxiety triggers washing, avoidance, and checking rituals; these rituals temporarily relieve anxiety, reinforcing the belief that the contamination threat is real and that the ritual is necessary; this strengthens future contamination fears and compulsive urges. Your marked perfectionism (60%) amplifies this by raising the standard for 'clean enough', making contamination anxiety feel more justified and compulsions feel more urgent. Taboo thoughts (60%) interact with this system through shame and emotional avoidance: the intrusive thoughts generate distress partly because your perfectionist standards include moral purity, making the thoughts feel like evidence of wrongdoing; this shame triggers avoidance (social withdrawal, isolation) and mental compulsions (reassurance-seeking, thought suppression), which paradoxically strengthen the thoughts themselves. The marked functional impact (60%) reflects the cumulative burden of these three reinforcing cycles: time consumed by compulsions, relationships strained by avoidance and perfectionist demands, emotional energy depleted by shame and contamination anxiety. A critical mechanism across all marked dimensions is 'experiential avoidance'—the use of rituals, avoidance, and mental strategies to escape unbearable discomfort—which, while providing short-term relief, maintains the underlying OCD by preventing you from learning that the feared outcome is not as catastrophic as it feels. Breaking these cycles requires shifting from avoidance to acceptance and gradual exposure, which is precisely the aim of Exposure with Response Prevention (ERP) and Acceptance-based therapies: by tolerating contamination anxiety without washing, taboo thoughts without reassurance, and imperfection without correcting, you teach your nervous system and your mind that these experiences are survivable and that they naturally diminish without ritual.

Your action plan

Right now

  • Create an OCD symptoms and rituals log: over the next 7 days, note each compulsion, avoidance, or distressing thought you experience (time of day, trigger, ritual duration, anxiety level 0-10, relief afterwards)—this generates concrete data on your patterns and will be invaluable for therapy planning.
  • Begin a daily coherence breathing practice (inhale for 5 seconds, exhale for 5 seconds, 5 minutes per day) to build capacity for tolerating anxiety without immediately resorting to rituals; use a free app such as Breathwrk or Insight Timer to guide you.
  • Identify one low-difficulty contamination exposure (e.g., touching your shoe, then your sleeve, without hand-washing) and practice it once daily for 2 minutes, deliberately tolerating the discomfort without washing; rate anxiety before (0-10), at 5 minutes, and at 10 minutes to observe that it peaks and decreases on its own.
  • Research and contact a therapist trained in Cognitive Behaviour Therapy for OCD or Exposure and Response Prevention; ask specifically whether they have training in OCD and experience with contamination fears, compulsions, and perfectionism—credentials from the International OCD Foundation or IOCDF are a strong indicator.

In the coming weeks

  • Engage in structured Exposure and Response Prevention (ERP) therapy: working with your therapist, build a contamination and compulsion hierarchy (ranking exposures by difficulty), then systematically move through it, practicing staying with anxiety without performing the ritual for 15-30 minutes until anxiety naturally decreases—expect to progress through 2-3 items per week depending on intensity.
  • Apply cognitive restructuring to perfectionist thoughts: using a structured thought record (Situation → Thought → Evidence For/Against → Realistic Alternative), challenge automatic thoughts such as 'This must be perfect' or 'I must be 100% certain it is clean'—aim for 2-3 thought records weekly; notice over time that the rigid thoughts lose power.
  • Implement 'response prevention' for mental compulsions around taboo thoughts: commit to a 2-week period in which you deliberately avoid seeking reassurance (from others or from yourself), avoid confessing intrusive thoughts, and avoid mental rituals such as reviewing the thought or trying to neutralize it—instead, practice labelling the thought as 'OCD content, not my belief' and moving on; expect discomfort initially, followed by habituation.
  • Begin a 'values clarification' process: write down your core values (e.g., authentic connection, meaningful work, physical health, creativity), then monthly reflect on whether your perfectionism and OCD avoidance are serving or hindering these values—this non-judgmental awareness often naturally shifts priorities and motivation.

In the long run

  • Build tolerance for imperfection and contamination uncertainty as a structured 6-month goal: establish a series of escalating 'imperfection experiments' (submitting work slightly unpolished, eating food prepared in less-than-perfectly-clean conditions, spending time in environments with dust or visible impurity, allowing relationships to be imperfect) and track your anxiety levels and your ability to function well despite discomfort—the aim is to loosen the grip of perfectionism and contamination fears on your daily choices by the end of 6 months.
  • Develop a relational and professional resilience plan: identify specific ways your OCD has constrained relationships (e.g., withdrawal, unmet social plans, tension with partners over cleanliness standards) and relationship areas you wish to reclaim (e.g., closer intimacy, social activities, teamwork without friction)—work with your therapist to set relational goals and practice valued behaviours despite OCD discomfort; track changes in closeness and satisfaction quarterly.
  • Establish a long-term self-care and relapse-prevention protocol: by 6 months, create a personalized 'OCD management plan' that includes early-warning signs of escalation (e.g., increased contamination checking, isolation, perfectionist self-criticism), preventive strategies (e.g., weekly ERP practice, valued-action commitments, connection with others), and a plan for quickly re-engaging therapy if symptoms rebound—this transforms OCD from a mysterious threat into a manageable condition with known tools for self-regulation.

Avenues to explore

These are hypotheses, not conclusions. You are the one who knows whether they resonate.

It may be that you are experiencing a form of OCD in which compulsions and rituals play a major role in how you manage anxiety, particularly around contamination and purity. In some women with this profile, the repetitive behaviours (cleaning, mental checking, arranging) serve to neutralise an underlying fear rather than to solve a real problem.

Check for yourself: Observe over 3-4 days: after completing a cleaning or arranging ritual, does the relief last only a few minutes before the worry returns? Note whether deliberately stopping the ritual brings a surge of anxiety. That would confirm that the compulsion–temporary relief cycle is active.

One possible explanation would be that your marked perfectionism and your need for exactness fuel an intolerance of uncertainty. It may be that you feel strong internal pressure to reach a state that is "just right" or "correct", which makes it hard to accept imperfection or doubt.

Check for yourself: Over the course of a week, identify the moments when you tell yourself "this isn't good enough" or "I have to do it again". Ask yourself: is this an external demand (does someone else really expect this of me?) or an internal one (am I setting it myself)? If it is internal, that is a sign that perfectionism plays a key role in your distress.

It may be that your marked taboo thoughts (60%) are especially intrusive precisely because they contradict your deepest values. In some people, the harder you try to push away or neutralise a disturbing thought, the more it comes back. The struggle against the thought becomes the problem in itself.

Check for yourself: When a taboo thought arises, note your immediate reaction: do you try to chase it away, to justify it mentally, or to neutralise it with a counter-thought? Then observe: does the thought disappear, or does it come back stronger after your attempt at control? If it comes back, that suggests mental control is maintaining the cycle.

One further avenue: your marked functional impact (60%) suggests that these symptoms take up a significant place in your daily life. It may be that you have gradually rearranged your life (avoiding certain places, people or situations) in order to reduce anxiety, which paradoxically reinforces the symptoms in the long run.

Check for yourself: Draw up a list of 5 activities, places or interactions that you used to engage in and that you now avoid or make more complicated (with rituals). For each one, estimate: how long ago did I start avoiding it? Has the avoidance increased my well-being, or has my life instead narrowed? This is a sign of accommodation to OCD.

15 clinical reading frameworks are applied to your profile below — the exact number announced for this test.

Reading frameworks

Recognised clinical frameworks applied to your profile, as additional perspectives to weigh.

Nervous system statesympathetic / chronic mobilisation with threat of tipping into dorsal shutdown

The marked functional impact (60%) and elevated compulsions (60%) point to a persistent state of alert: the nervous system remains mobilised to contain the threat perceived through the rituals. Moments of uncertainty or ritual failure risk triggering dysregulated crises or dissociative freezing.

Cognitive patternCatastrophising

The marked taboo thoughts (60%) and the elevated need for certainty suggest a tendency to amplify the threat perceived in intrusive thoughts. This catastrophic escalation could be fuelling the urgency of the compulsive rituals.

Cognitive patternAll-or-nothing thinking

The marked perfectionism (60%) and the associated rigidity reflect a tendency to perceive situations without shades of grey: a slight asymmetry or uncertainty becomes intolerable. This dichotomy fuels the obsessive-compulsive loop.

Cognitive patternMind reading / Inflated moral responsibility

The marked taboo thoughts and the elevated functional impact (60%) suggest a hyper-responsible interpretation of intrusive thoughts, as though their mere presence amounted to an intention or a real danger that only the ritual can neutralise.

Early schemaDefectiveness / Shame

The marked taboo thoughts (60%) and the associated distress suggest an underlying conviction that these thoughts reveal an internal defect or a failing morality, reinforcing shame and the need to "put things right" through rituals.

Early schemaUnrelenting Standards / Intolerance of imperfection

The marked perfectionism (60%), the fear of contamination (60%) and the need for order and symmetry (40%) reflect rigid internal standards in which no approximation is acceptable, which keeps the compulsions in place.

Cognitive distortions — Sources: Beck (1976) ; Burns (1980)

Young schemas — Sources: Young, Klosko & Weishaar (2003) ; Young (1990)

Polyvagal theory — Sources: Porges (2011) ; Dana (2018) — proposed/debated theory

Additional clinical frameworks

Recognised models for this domain, applied to your profile as hypotheses to weigh — not a diagnosis.

OCD and rumination

Cognitive model of OCD (Salkovskis)

Your profile shows an interesting tension: relatively moderate intrusive thoughts (40%), but marked compulsions (60%) and a substantial functional impact (60%). This sometimes brings to mind Salkovskis's model, in which an ordinary intrusive thought (contamination, order, taboo thoughts) triggers an inflated interpretation of personal responsibility — "If I don't clean / don't arrange / don't control this thought, something bad could happen". Could it be that you have attributed to your thoughts or actions a responsibility heavier than it really is, thereby justifying the compulsive effort to "repair" or "prevent"?

Sources: Salkovskis (1985)

Thought-action fusion

The prevalence of your taboo thoughts (60%) together with a marked compulsive need (60%) suggests possible thought-action fusion: the fear that merely *thinking* something unacceptable (a violent image, a disturbing impulse) is almost equivalent to having carried it out or to deeply wishing for it. That would reinforce the need to "control" or "neutralise" the thought through mental or behavioural rituals. Do you have the impression that your taboo thoughts reflect your true values or intentions, rather than being random intruders?

Sources: Rachman (1993) ; Shafran, Thordarson & Rachman (1996)

Metacognitive model (Wells)

Your marked perfectionism (60%) and your high functional distress (60%) hint at a possible metacognitive loop: not only do you have thoughts or preoccupations (contamination, order, taboo), but you may also hold beliefs *about* those thoughts — "I absolutely must control them", "a good person shouldn't think that", "if I don't stay vigilant, everything will fall apart". These beliefs about your own thoughts can become as exhausting as the thought itself. Do you recognise yourself in this tendency to monitor or judge your thoughts, rather than simply letting them pass?

Sources: Wells (2009)

Cross-cutting frameworks

Cognitive distortions

This profile suggests thinking that is often polarised: contamination or imperfection are perceived as unacceptable, with no middle ground (all-or-nothing). It may be that you turn a minor possibility into a catastrophic certainty ("if I don't wash my hands *perfectly*, I will be contaminated"), thereby amplifying the distress and justifying the rituals. Recognising these automatic biases is a first step towards questioning them.

Sources: Beck (1976) ; Burns (1980)

Emotion regulation

You seem to rely heavily on *behavioural suppression* (compulsions: washing, arranging, checking) rather than on cognitive reappraisal of the intrusive thoughts. This strategy brings brief relief but reinforces the cycle: the rituals validate the obsession and make it stickier. Exploring a gradual acceptance of unpleasant thoughts, without acting on them, could transform your relationship to these intrusions.

Sources: Gross (1998) ; Gross (2015)

Ellis's ABC model

Your taboo thoughts and doubts set off a chain: Activating event (an unwanted thought) → Rigid belief ("this thought means I am dangerous or contaminated") → Consequence (intense distress and a need to perform a compulsion). It is not the thoughts themselves that cause the suffering, but the interpretation you place on them. Questioning the validity of this belief could reduce the urgency of the ritual.

Sources: Ellis (1962) ; Ellis & Harper (1975)

Mindfulness

You seem fused with your intrusive thoughts: you treat them as signals of real danger demanding immediate action. Mindfulness invites you to observe them as passing mental events, without fighting them or pushing them away. Accepting "I am having an unpleasant thought" rather than "I absolutely must neutralise it" eases the nervous system and the obsessional cycle.

Sources: Kabat-Zinn (1990) ; Segal, Williams & Teasdale (2002)

Polyvagal theory

Your marked compulsions and your rigid perfectionism suggest prolonged activation of the sympathetic system (vigilance, alertness to danger). Your nervous system interprets uncertainty or minor discrepancies as threats, hence the mobilisation to "put things right". Developing somatic anchors (breathing, mindful movement) could signal to your body that it is safe, reducing the constant need for corrective action.

Sources: Porges (2011) ; Dana (2018) — proposed/debated theory

Self-efficacy

The marked functional impact (60%) suggests that the compulsions, though temporarily soothing, leave you with a limited sense of real control over your life. Strengthening your confidence in your ability to *tolerate* uncertainty and to live without rituals — rather than seeking perfect certainty — would be a turning point: each small successful exposure would consolidate that sense of efficacy.

Sources: Bandura (1997) ; Bandura (1977)

These frameworks do not constitute a medical diagnosis.

Your profile, told as a whole

When we step back from the individual scores, a central logic emerges: your world is shaped less by the frequency of intrusive thoughts than by a powerful conviction that certain things must be kept in order—physically, morally, and mentally. Your perfectionism (marked) and contamination fears (marked) seem to act as twin engines, driving the marked compulsions and the shame-laced avoidance of taboo thoughts. Perfectionism sets a high, often rigid standard for how you, your environment, and even your mind should be. Contamination fear then specifies what threatens that standard: anything that feels 'unclean'—whether a germ, a mistake, or a forbidden impulse—must be neutralized. The compulsions become the tools for that neutralization: washing, ordering, mentally undoing. The relatively mild obsessions, rumination, and doubt suggest that the raw material of intrusive thoughts does not, on its own, hook you deeply; it’s the behavioural response—the rituals and the rigidity—that locks the cycle in place. This explains why functional distress is marked: your energy is consumed not by wrestling with thoughts, but by performing and maintaining safety routines, leaving less room for spontaneity, relationships, and ease. This configuration creates a profound internal tension. What it makes easy is a sense of control, predictability, and moral integrity. You likely come across as reliable, thorough, and conscientious—traits that may have earned you respect and stability. You can create order out of chaos, avoid visible mistakes, and feel a certain safety when everything is 'right'. What it makes costly is equally significant. The rituals and rigidity demand time and emotional bandwidth, often leaving you depleted. The shame attached to taboo thoughts can push you into silence and isolation, as if a part of you must remain hidden. The very control that brings relief also narrows your life, making it harder to tolerate the messiness of intimacy, the ambiguity of complex decisions, or the simple pleasure of leaving a dish unwashed. The marked functional impact signals that this equilibrium is no longer a neutral maintenance system; it has become an active constraint, pinching your freedom and perhaps making you feel that you are living to manage OCD rather than managing OCD to live. How might such an equilibrium have taken shape? Often, patterns like these serve a vital purpose before they become a burden. You may have learned early—perhaps in a demanding, critical, or chaotic environment—that to keep things orderly and error-free was to keep anxiety or disapproval at bay. Perfectionism could have been a shield against criticism; contamination fears, a way to maintain control when boundaries felt fragile. Taboo thoughts, if viewed as morally dangerous, would naturally invite intense self-policing. The system once protected you: it offered a script for navigating uncertainty, a sense of agency when the world felt unpredictable. It may have carried you through academic pressures, early career demands, or family roles that required flawless performance. Now, at 36, with professional and relational demands pulling you in multiple directions, the same system expects you to sustain that flawless performance across an ever-widening stage—and it overfunctions, treating ordinary life as a series of threats that require ritual resolution. Within this profile, a quiet resource deserves attention: the fact that your obsessions, doubt, and rumination are mild. This suggests that you are not constantly entangled in cognitive loops. When a distressing thought arises, you may have a natural capacity to let it pass if you do not engage in a ritual. The engine isn't the thought itself but the urgency to act upon it. That mildness is a foundation you can build on—it hints that your mind is capable of living with uncertainty when not pushed by the demand for absolute order or purity. Also, your mild checking and low doubt suggest that in many areas of your life, you trust your own judgment. You can make decisions and move forward without repeatedly verifying. These underused strengths—the ability to observe a thought without being ruled by it, and the confidence in your own eyes—are the raw materials for change. They show that the rigidity is not a character trait but a learned strategy that can be practiced differently. What might shift first? A promising place is the perfectionism, because it stitches together the contamination fears and the compulsions. If you could tolerate a small, deliberate imperfection—perhaps an item slightly out of place, or a hand washed only once instead of twice—you might discover that the feared consequence does not materialize, or that the distress is briefer than expected. The concrete sign that change is taking root would be a moment of surprise: you notice the urge to ritualize, you choose a different action, and the anxiety gradually fades rather than escalates. This would be a new learning, a crack in the old logic. Because your rumination and obsessions are already mild, such experiments are less likely to trigger a spiral of overthinking. You are not starting from a place of chaotic mental noise; you have internal space to observe, experiment, and recalibrate. The goal is not to eradicate all caution or order—these traits have value—but to loosen the grip of the rituals so that you can recover time, emotional freedom, and the courage to face the taboo thoughts without shame. This portrait is a hypothesis, not a verdict, and you are the expert on whether it resonates with your lived experience.

Your dimensions in real life

A score is not lived as a number but as a scene. See if you recognise yours — or set it aside.

Obsessions & intrusive thoughts

You may be chopping vegetables for dinner, the rhythmic thud of the knife a familiar backdrop, when an unbidden thought flashes—an image of the knife slipping, perhaps. It might hang there for a few seconds, a flicker of discomfort, before you notice the sound of the onions sizzling in the pan. You might take a slow breath, your hands continuing their motion, and the image recedes without demanding attention. The thought doesn't loop or morph into a catastrophe; it simply drifts, like a stray cloud passing overhead. Your focus gently steadies on the recipe, and the meal takes shape as usual.

To try: The next time an unexpected thought surfaces, try labeling it quietly to yourself—'a thought about the knife'—without pushing it away. Let it be there as you keep chopping, noticing the smells and textures of the kitchen. See if you can let the thought fade naturally, without needing to review or neutralize it.

Compulsions & rituals

It might start with a faint sense of unease as you close your laptop for the day—a conviction that you must tap the desk three times before standing up. Your hand might move in a familiar pattern, the rhythmic touch easing the tension for a fleeting moment. Then, a new whisper: maybe four taps would feel safer. You might repeat the sequence, feeling time slip away, aware of a subtle embarrassment even as you comply. The minutes accumulate, and the relief is brief, replaced by a vague frustration that this little dance controls your exit from the room.

To try: One evening, when the urge to tap arises, try pausing for just ten seconds with your hands resting on your lap. Notice the discomfort without acting on it, like watching ripples on a pond. After the pause, you might still stand up, but see if you can do it with one tap, or none. Then simply walk to the kitchen for a glass of water.

Checking

Imagine you're leaving your apartment in the morning, bag slung over your shoulder, keys in hand. You lock the door and walk down the hallway, but a faint question stirs: Did I really turn the lock? You might briefly replay the click of the key in your mind, the image of the bolt sliding home. Without much pause, you continue to the elevator, the doubt dissolving as you check your phone for the time. It's a passing flicker—you don't circle back, don't feel a knot of anxiety. The day unfolds without further echo of the door.

To try: On a morning when that quiet doubt arises, try saying to yourself, 'Maybe I did, maybe I didn't—I'm moving on.' Allow the elevator ride to be an experiment: what does it feel like to let uncertainty ride along? Notice if your body relaxes as you choose the next task, rather than certainty.

Contamination & washing

You may be at a coffee shop, your fingers brushing the sticky edge of the communal sugar jar. A prickle of warmth starts in your palms, spreading to a tightness in your chest. Your mind might zero in on the dozens of unknown hands that touched it before you, cataloging invisible traces. You excuse yourself to the restroom, where the water runs hot, and you methodically lather between each finger, counting silently—once, twice—as the soap bubbles turn transparent. The ritual might bring a short exhale of relief, until you catch your reflection touching the tap handle to turn it off, and the cycle starts to whisper again.

To try: Next time you touch a shared surface, try delaying your handwashing by five minutes—just long enough to feel the anxiety rise and then observe its shape without engaging with the compulsion. During that pause, focus on the sensation in your hands without labeling it 'dirty,' maybe holding a cool cup or resting them on smooth fabric.

Order, symmetry & exactness

You might be at your desk, and the stack of papers sits a few degrees askew against the edge of the keyboard. A tiny nudge of irritation might tap at your attention, like a pebble in your shoe. You could straighten them without thinking much about it, aligning the corner exactly with the wood grain. But if a colleague interrupts with a question, you might leave the papers slightly off and turn to listen, the misalignment forgotten within a few minutes. The world doesn't tilt; the conversation is more absorbing than the angle of paper.

To try: Choose a small, low-stakes item—a cushion, a book—and deliberately place it a few degrees off-center. Sit with the sight for a full minute without correcting it. Describe to yourself what you feel, and then leave it as is for the rest of the afternoon, noticing whether tolerance grows.

Taboo thoughts

Picture riding a crowded bus, your gaze idly passing over a fellow passenger, when an intrusive image of harm blinks into your mind—sudden, vivid, and repulsive. Heat may flood your face, and your inner voice might hiss, 'What kind of person thinks that?' You might stiffen, pull your bag tighter, and mentally repeat a safe phrase to scrub it away. The shame can feel dense, making you want to shrink or exit at the next stop. For minutes afterward, you might avoid eye contact with anyone, convinced the thought revealed something dangerous about you.

To try: In a moment of privacy later that day, try re-imagining the scene deliberately, like watching a movie trailer you didn't choose. Let the image play without a mental counter-argument, just noticing the shame ebb and flow. Afterwards, observe if the thought loses its sharp edge and if the urge to push it away lessens.

Doubt & need for certainty

You may send a text to a friend about weekend plans, and a swift reply comes back: 'Sounds good!' As you put the phone down, a quiet question surfaces—Was my tone right? Could I have offended? Your mind might replay the wording two or three times, but no physical knot forms in your stomach. A moment later, your cat jumps onto the couch, and you look up, the doubt lingering softly in the background. You don't re-read the exchange; you move to the kitchen to make tea, accepting that you can't know exactly how the message landed, and that discomfort drifts away.

To try: When a similar small doubt arises, try a one-minute rule: notice the question, and set a timer for sixty seconds during which you don't seek answers or reassurances. When the timer dings, ask yourself if the need for certainty has loosened and if you can engage with the next real moment—like petting the cat.

Perfectionism & rigidity

You might be preparing a presentation for a team meeting, the draft finished but hauntingly imperfect. An extra space before a bullet, a phrase that could be sharper—you tweak, then tweak again, the clock inching toward midnight. Your shoulders are rigid, and a low thrum of frustration hums as you reorder slides for the third time, convinced the whole thing will crumble if it's not flawless. Sleep is postponed, not because of the content, but because the act of letting it be feels impossible. The final click of 'save' comes not from satisfaction, but exhaustion, and the morning arrives with hollowed eyes.

To try: For your next task, set a hard stop: allow a defined amount of time, and when it’s up, step away even if the work feels unpolished. Share it with a trusted colleague or friend in that 'imperfect' state and ask for feedback. Notice what happens to the tightness in your chest when you trust that the world won't end on a font glitch.

Mental rumination

Perhaps late in the evening, you remember a minor misstatement from a lunch conversation—saying 'Tuesday' when you meant 'Thursday.' Your mind might turn it over idly, replaying the moment and the other person's reaction. A soft heat of embarrassment might warm your ears, but then the sound of your favourite podcast drifts from the other room. You rise to listen, and the loop breaks, the thought settling into the background like a pebble dropped in deep water. You don't spend the night analyzing why you misspoke, and sleep comes without the replay.

To try: If you catch yourself replaying a small mistake, try 'naming and shelving' it: say to yourself, 'Ah, the Tuesday memory again,' and imagine placing it on a literal shelf in your mind. Then intentionally turn your attention to a sensory pleasure—the warmth of a mug, the texture of a blanket—and see if the thought can stay on the shelf for the evening.

Distress & functional impact

A Saturday morning meant for a park run slips away as you get caught in a sequence of washing and re-dressing—the socks don’t sit right, the tap handle feels unclean, the routine swells to fill the hours. By the time you look up, the sun is high, and your running shoes wait untouched. A wave of sadness might wash over you, mixed with a weary frustration: it's not just a missed run, but the sense of a life constantly diverted. You might stare at the clouds from the window, feeling disconnected from the person you used to be, wondering how much more time these patterns will claim.

To try: Pick one small act of reclamation for the next few days—perhaps a five-minute walk around the block, no matter what rituals were skipped. Afterward, jot down in a single sentence how it felt to reclaim that sliver of time. Notice if the joy or relief, however fragile, can be a compass for another small step tomorrow.

What this report cannot tell you

The same result allows several readings. Here are the ones that compete with ours.

This self-report questionnaire captures your subjective perception of symptoms at a single moment in time. It cannot distinguish between a stable trait, a temporary response to current life stressors, or an episode that will shift naturally. Factors such as your mood on the day of the assessment, social desirability (the wish to present yourself in a certain light), or recent events may have influenced your answers. The test also does not assess important contextual information—your personal history, cultural background, coping resources, or the specific situations that trigger symptoms. It measures only what you notice and choose to report, which might over- or underrepresent certain dimensions. Moreover, the cutoffs between 'mild' and 'marked' are statistical conventions, not clinical thresholds; a 60% score does not automatically mean a disorder. This profile is therefore a starting point for reflection, not a photograph of your psychology.

A Highly Conscientious Personality in a Demanding Culture

What appear as perfectionism and compulsions might reflect a personality trait of extreme conscientiousness that is culturally rewarded. In professional and social environments that prize flawlessness, order, and self-control, your behaviors may have been reinforced as strengths rather than symptoms. The contamination fears could be a heightened form of normal disgust sensitivity—a trait that evolved to protect health—amplified by messages about hygiene and risk in modern life. The taboo thoughts and subsequent shame might stem from a strong moral compass rather than pathology, marking you as someone who cares deeply about ethical boundaries. From this angle, your pattern is not a dysfunction but an adaptive set of standards that, in a more flexible or less pressurized context, could serve you well without the marked distress you currently feel.

Internalized Moral Vigilance from a Strict Upbringing

Your marked taboo thoughts and contamination fears could be rooted in a moral or religious upbringing that equated 'bad' thoughts with danger and purity with safety. If early environments taught you that certain thoughts or substances were contaminating the soul or social standing, the compulsive washing and order-seeking would be logical protective measures. The perfectionism might then represent an internalized voice requiring moral flawlessness. The mild obsessions and low rumination suggest that the thoughts themselves are not the problem; rather, it is the ingrained belief that they must be neutralized. This alternative reading frames your experience as a learned ethical framework that has become too rigid, rather than a mental illness, opening the door to examining the messages you internalized and their relevance to your adult life.

Adaptive Response to a Chaotic Environment

Sometimes, ritual and order are survival strategies in the face of unpredictability. If, at some point in your life, your environment felt chaotic—due to family instability, a critical parent, or a prolonged period of uncertainty—the focus on cleanliness, symmetry, and rigid control may have created a small, predictable island. The taboo thoughts could be the mind’s way of testing boundaries in a world that felt unsafe, and the compulsions your way of re-establishing control. Now, even if the chaos has receded, the coping mechanism persists. The marked functional distress might reflect the mismatch between that old adaptation and your current, potentially more stable circumstances. In this reading, the pattern is not a fault in you but evidence of your resourcefulness under pressure, now due for an update.

Sensitivity to Disgust and Moral Intuition, Not Pathology

Recent research distinguishes between pathological OCD and a highly developed sensitivity to disgust or moral violations. People vary naturally in how readily they feel disgusted or how intensely they react to injustice. Your marked contamination fear and taboo thoughts could represent an innate, heightened sensitivity that, in many roles (caregiving, design, ethics), is a genuine asset. The rituals and perfectionism then arise from an understandable desire to align the external world with this finely tuned internal sensor. Distress emerges not from the sensitivity itself but from the gap between your ideals and an imperfect world. From this viewpoint, the goal is not to dull your sensitivity but to develop strategies that honor it without letting it commandeer your daily life, allowing you to live with more flexibility while retaining your depth of feeling.

Questions to keep exploring

To write about on your own, or to bring to a professional.

  • When you reflect on your perfectionism, can you identify a specific domain (work, relationships, appearance) where it feels like a helpful compass pointing you toward excellence, and another where it feels more like a harsh critic that drains your energy? What do those two selves have to teach you?
  • If you were to imagine, just for a moment, that a contamination fear you hold (e.g., touching a doorknob without washing) had no power over you, what would you do with the time and emotional space that opens up? What might this reveal about what the ritual is protecting you from, or costing you?
  • With taboo thoughts being a marked source of distress, in what circumstances do these thoughts feel most shameful and dangerous, and in what circumstances—if any—do they briefly seem like odd mental flotsam that you can let pass without judgment? What shifts between those two experiences?
  • The test suggests marked functional impact on your quality of life. Which specific area—daily workflow, intimate relationships, leisure, self-image—feels most constricted by the rituals and avoidance, and what would a small, tangible sign of relief look like there?
  • Given that your doubt and checking are mild, you likely have areas of life where you trust your own judgment and can move forward without redoing. What is one such area, and how could the confidence you feel there be gently invited into a situation where you normally feel compelled to ritualize?
  • If you were to experiment with delaying a single compulsion by just five minutes, what do you predict would happen emotionally? What do you fear might happen, and what might you learn if the actual outcome differs from the prediction?
  • Consider the idea of being 'perfectly imperfect' in one small, low-stakes area of your life. What comes up for you—a sense of relief, a spike of anxiety, a curiosity? What does that reaction tell you about the role perfectionism plays in your internal landscape?
  • If, as some alternative readings suggest, these patterns once helped you navigate a more demanding or chaotic environment, what would it be like to offer gratitude to that younger self for the protection they provided, while exploring whether the current chapter of your life invites a different kind of inner guardian?

Reference frameworks and authors

To help you situate this report, here are the references specific to this test.

  • DSM-5 — Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (American Psychiatric Association, 2013)
  • ICD-11 — International Classification of Diseases, 11th Revision (World Health Organization, 2022)

Resources & exercise

7-day observation journal

Each day, spot one situation where “Compulsions & rituals” showed up. Note the automatic thought, the emotion (0–100) and what you did. Then write one more balanced, alternative reading. After 7 days, re-read your notes: the recurring patterns become visible — the first step to change them.

Support resources

If you are struggling, you are not alone. United States: call or text 988 (Suicide & Crisis Lifeline, 24/7). Elsewhere: find your local line at findahelpline.com. This report supports self-knowledge and does not replace a consultation with a psychologist or doctor.

Find a professional

To go further, working with a professional is valuable. A few trusted directories to find a practitioner near you:

Tip: prioritise licensed/registered professionals and evidence-based therapies (e.g. CBT).

How this report is produced

This report is generated by artificial intelligence from your answers only, structured around recognised clinical models (attachment theory, CBT, Young’s schemas…) cited within the report. No health professional is involved in writing it. It is a self-knowledge tool, not a diagnosis: the analyses are avenues for understanding to weigh against your own experience, and do not replace the assessment of a health professional.

Your answers in detail

1. Unwanted thoughts force themselves on me against my will.

Answer : Rarely

You answered "Rarely". Can you tell me more about when this comes up for you?

It mainly shows up in situations that matter to me, when I feel under pressure or emotionally involved.

2. The same intrusive thoughts come back on a loop.

Answer : Rarely

And how long have you noticed this?

It has been more present over the past few months, though I recognise it from before too.

3. I cannot chase certain thoughts away.

Answer : Rarely

4. Disturbing images pop into my mind.

Answer : Rarely

5. These thoughts generate strong anxiety.

Answer : Rarely

6. I feel invaded by thoughts I reject.

Answer : Rarely

7. …

The next questions (7, 8…) continue in your test. This sample only shows the beginning — the full test has 154 questions, and every answer refines your report.

What now?

You've just seen what your answers reveal. Your Full Assessment goes further: a personalized, step-by-step path to turn this understanding into concrete change — at your own pace.

Get YOUR OCD Test: Full Assessment of Obsessions & Compulsions report

Answer the 154 questions, then unlock your full report: interpretation, 12 clinical reading frameworks, recommendations and PDF — from €4.99.

← Back to the test page

Join our exchange group

A caring, application-based space for exchange on WhatsApp — not therapy.

Join the Community (waiting list)

A doubt about a real relationship?

Decode your actual conversation, message by message.

Analyze →