Hello Emma,
Overall result
Marked social anxietyMarked social anxiety stands out across several facets. This result is not a diagnosis: it describes an intense fear of being judged and evaluated by others, with an impact on your interactions. It is one of the profiles that responds best to CBT.
Your profile at a glance
Detailed analysis
This tendency is clear in you — here is what it reveals, to understand and move forward.
Anxiety linked to everyday social interactions (conversations, meeting people, exchanges)
Your high score describes significant anxiety in ordinary social interactions (starting a conversation, joining a group, talking with strangers). At the heart of social anxiety, the central fear is that of being judged negatively, of appearing anxious, incompetent or uninteresting. One way of reading it, to weigh against your own experience, is that this anxiety feeds itself through a well-identified mechanism: attention turns inward (you monitor yourself, you watch for signs of your own discomfort), which undermines the spontaneity of the exchange and fuels the fear of being poorly perceived. Avoidance and safety behaviours (speaking little, scripting your sentences, avoiding eye contact) bring relief in the moment but prevent you from discovering that others don't judge as harshly as you anticipate. Recognising this mechanism is the starting point for gradually regaining ease.
Recommendations
- ✓Practise redirecting your attention outward (your conversation partner, the content of the exchange) rather than toward yourself and your discomfort: it is one of the most effective levers against social anxiety.
- ✓Identify and gradually reduce your safety behaviours (scripting sentences, talking fast, avoiding eye contact) that keep alive the belief that you have to 'protect' yourself.
- ✓Expose yourself gradually to interactions of increasing difficulty, staying in the situation rather than cutting it short.
- ✓Social anxiety responds particularly well to CBT: professional support offers structured exposure and cognitive restructuring, with documented results.
This tendency is clear in you — here is what it reveals, to understand and move forward.
Fear of failing or being judged negatively during tasks carried out in front of others
This high score describes intense anxiety in performance or exposure situations (public speaking, presenting, being evaluated). It is often the most disabling facet professionally. One reading hypothesis, to weigh against your own experience, is that anxious anticipation largely precedes the situation (rumination, failure scenarios), amplifies physiological arousal on the day itself (trembling, blushing, a shaky voice), and is then followed by a harsh 'post-mortem' after the event (rumination on what supposedly went wrong) — three phases that sustain the fear. Central to this is the fear that visible signs of anxiety will be noticed and judged, whereas others generally perceive them far less than you fear. Working on these three phases (before, during, after) and on the overestimation of how visible your anxiety is, is particularly effective here.
Recommendations
- ✓Prepare the content but NOT the word-for-word: over-preparation is a safety behaviour that increases pressure; aim to master the substance, not to perfect the form.
- ✓On the day, refocus your attention on your message and your audience rather than on your image and your sensations.
- ✓Forbid yourself the harsh 'post-mortem': replace rumination with a balanced review (one thing that went well, one thing to adjust).
- ✓Expose yourself gradually to performance situations (speaking up in a small group, then a larger one) to build up corrective experiences.
This tendency is present in you — here is what it sheds light on.
Anxiety linked to being observed, watched or at the centre of attention
Your moderate score describes discomfort at being watched while acting (eating, writing, working under others' gaze). This facet reflects the fear that others' eyes will detect a sign of discomfort or incompetence. One avenue, to weigh against your own experience, is the 'spotlight' hypothesis: the sense of being far more observed and scrutinised than you really are (others are in fact focused on themselves). The moderate level of the score suggests this discomfort is present but not overwhelming. Testing the reality of how much attention others actually pay you — often far less than imagined — is a particularly illuminating exercise for this facet, and it benefits the other facets of your profile by reducing the general fear of being watched.
Recommendations
- ✓Test the 'spotlight' effect: notice how much time YOU actually spend scrutinising others in a public place — usually very little, which helps put into perspective the attention paid to you.
- ✓Expose yourself gradually to acting under others' gaze (working in a café, eating in public), staying there despite the initial discomfort.
- ✓Refocus your attention on your activity rather than on the image you project.
- ✓Afterwards, note how many real negative reactions you actually observed vs anticipated: the gap is usually very telling.
This tendency is present in you — here is what it sheds light on.
Difficulty asserting yourself, expressing your opinions and setting limits in social contexts
This moderate score describes difficulty asserting yourself: expressing disagreement, saying no, making a request or defending your point of view. Within social anxiety, assertive inhibition often stems from the fear that asserting yourself will provoke rejection, conflict or negative judgment. One way of reading it, to weigh against your own experience, is that avoiding assertiveness (giving in, staying silent, going around things) protects you from relational risk in the short term but sustains the belief that you cannot assert yourself safely, and may breed frustration and a loss of self-worth. The moderate level of the score suggests a difficulty that is present but workable. Self-assertion is learned through concrete steps: it is a skill, not a fixed trait, and each small success nourishes the confidence for the next.
Recommendations
- ✓Start with small, low-stakes assertions (expressing a preference, asking for a clarification) to experience that asserting yourself does not bring the feared consequences.
- ✓Use simple assertive phrasings ('I'd rather…', 'I don't agree with…', 'I need…') that express your position without aggression or self-erasure.
- ✓Prepare in advance one or two situations where you want to assert yourself, and rehearse mentally or with someone you trust.
- ✓Connect assertiveness to your legitimate rights (to have an opinion, to say no, to make a mistake): this inner framing supports taking action.
Profile synthesis
Your profile shows marked social anxiety, particularly in interactions and performance situations, with a more moderate component of inhibition around being observed and around self-assertion. The common thread, to weigh against your own experience, is a central fear of being judged and negatively evaluated by others, which plays out differently depending on the context (talking, performing, being observed, asserting yourself). A well-documented integrative reading identifies three mechanisms that sustain this anxiety: self-focused attention (monitoring yourself instead of living the exchange), safety behaviours (which prevent corrective experiences) and the overestimation both of how harshly others judge and of how visible your own anxiety is. It is important to remember that this test describes tendencies and makes no diagnosis. The most encouraging fact is that social anxiety is one of the disorders that responds BEST to cognitive behavioural therapy: targeting self-focused attention, reducing safety behaviours and graded exposure produce solid, lasting results. At 36, regaining social ease situation after situation is entirely accessible, and does not require 'changing your personality' but learning to shift your attention and accumulate corrective experiences. If this reading resonates, it can guide your efforts; if not, your own experience is what counts.
How your dimensions interact
The four facets of your profile share a common root: the fear of negative evaluation. Interactions, performance, being observed and self-assertion are all contexts where this central fear is activated. One possible dynamic, to weigh against your own experience, links these facets through three cross-cutting mechanisms: self-focused attention (monitoring yourself rather than living the situation) undermines your actual performance and fuels the fear; safety behaviours (avoiding eye contact, preparing, staying silent, giving in) bring relief but keep you from discovering that the worst does not happen; and the overestimation of others' judgment keeps the perceived threat alive. Since these three mechanisms are common to all four facets, working on them benefits the whole: learning to redirect attention outward, gradually dropping safety behaviours and testing the reality of others' judgment simultaneously defuses interaction, performance, observation and assertion anxiety. That is why coherent work, even focused at first on a single facet, tends to improve the overall profile.
Your action plan
Right now
- →This week, in one interaction, practise once deliberately placing your attention on your conversation partner (their words, their face) rather than on yourself: observe the effect on your anxiety.
- →Spot your safety behaviours (scripting sentences, avoiding eye contact, speaking little): naming them is the prerequisite to reducing them.
- →Carry out a low-stakes micro-assertion (expressing a preference, asking for a clarification) and note the real vs feared consequences.
In the coming weeks
- →Over 1 to 3 months, build a graded social exposure hierarchy (from easiest to hardest) and work your way up it, reducing your safety behaviours at each step.
- →Work on cognitive restructuring around the overestimation of others' judgment and of how visible your anxiety is (testing your predictions vs reality).
- →For performance, practise refocusing on the message and replacing the harsh 'post-mortem' with a balanced review.
In the long run
- →Over 6 to 12 months, aim for broader social ease: a measurable goal = social and performance situations once avoided becoming accessible again, with manageable anxiety. Steps: consolidate exposure, anchor external attention, develop self-assertion.
- →Build a self-esteem less dependent on others' approval (self-compassion, personal values), a foundation that lowers the stakes of each interaction.
- →Since social anxiety responds very well to CBT, specialised support (individual or group) is a particularly effective investment if self-guided work plateaus.
Avenues to explore
These are hypotheses, not conclusions. You are the one who knows whether they resonate.
It may be that your social anxiety feeds itself less through any real judgment from others than through your attention turned toward yourself: monitoring yourself undermines the exchange and fuels the fear of being poorly perceived.
Check for yourself: In an upcoming interaction, consciously alternate between monitoring yourself and focusing on the other person: note when the anxiety is strongest. If it's while monitoring yourself, self-focused attention is a key driver.
One possible explanation is that you greatly overestimate how much others notice your anxiety (blushing, voice): this is the 'spotlight' effect, where you believe you are far more scrutinised than you are.
Check for yourself: After a situation, ask a trusted person who was present whether they noticed your anxiety, and compare it to what you feared. The gap is often striking.
It may be that your safety behaviours (preparing, avoiding eye contact, staying silent) are precisely what prevent you from discovering that you can cope without them.
Check for yourself: During an interaction, drop one safety behaviour (look the other person in the eye, for instance) and observe whether the feared catastrophe occurs. Most often, it does not.
11 clinical reading frameworks are applied to your profile below — the exact number announced for this test.
Reading frameworks
Recognised clinical frameworks applied to your profile, as additional perspectives to weigh.
Nervous system state — sympathetic mobilisation (social alarm)
Feared social situations trigger an alarm response of the nervous system (blushing, trembling, a shaky voice, the urge to flee). Understanding that this is a false social alarm — not a real danger — helps you not to fear it, which reduces its intensity. Do you recognise this bodily activation in those moments?
Cognitive pattern — mind reading
Social anxiety rests largely on inferring others' judgment without evidence ('he thinks I'm boring'). To explore: do you conclude that others judge you negatively from faint signals?
Cognitive pattern — overestimation / catastrophising
The likelihood and severity of a social 'slip-up' are overestimated ('I'm going to make a fool of myself, it will be a disaster'). To check: do your social predictions actually turn out as badly as you expect?
Early schema — defectiveness / shame
Social anxiety often resonates with a defectiveness schema: the fear that, by showing yourself, you will reveal an inadequacy. To weigh against your history: do you dread that others will 'discover' a flaw in you?
Early schema — social isolation
The fear of judgment can be rooted in an isolation schema: the feeling of being different or of not belonging to the group. Have you often felt out of step with others?
Attachment — Sources: John Bowlby (1969) ; Kim Bartholomew, Leonard Horowitz (1991)
Cognitive distortions — Sources: Aaron Beck (1976) ; David Burns (1980)
Young's schemas — Sources: Jeffrey Young (1990)
Polyvagal theory — Sources: Stephen Porges (2011) — proposed/debated theory
Additional clinical frameworks
Recognised models for this domain, applied to your profile as hypotheses to weigh — not a diagnosis.
Models of anxiety and phobia
Cognitive model of social phobia (Clark & Wells)
This landmark model identifies three drivers: self-focused attention, safety behaviours and anticipatory/post-event processing. It underpins CBT for social anxiety. Do you recognise these three phases (anxious anticipation, self-monitoring during, rumination after)?
Sources: David M. Clark, Adrian Wells (1995)
Fear-avoidance cycle (Mowrer)
Two-factor theory sheds light on how social fear is maintained: avoidance (or safety behaviours) brings short-term relief but prevents extinction, thereby reinforcing the fear. Does each avoided interaction relieve you in the moment yet heighten your apprehension afterwards?
Sources: O. H. Mowrer (1960)
Graded exposure (emotional processing of fear)
Exposing yourself gradually to feared social situations, without safety behaviours and for long enough, allows habituation and the build-up of corrective experiences. This is the heart of treatment. Would you be willing to stay in a social situation despite the discomfort, rather than cut it short?
Sources: Edna Foa, Michael Kozak (1986)
Cross-cutting frameworks
Self-compassion (Neff)
Neff's self-compassion lowers the social stakes: treating yourself with kindness after an imperfect interaction defuses the harsh 'post-mortem' and the fear of doing badly. How do you talk to yourself after a social situation that didn't go as you'd hoped?
Sources: Kristin Neff (2003)
Cognitive triad (Beck)
Beck's cognitive triad sheds light on the view of oneself (socially incompetent) and of others (harsh judges) at the heart of social anxiety. Testing these thoughts nuances them. Do your social anticipations automatically tilt toward the negative?
Sources: Aaron T. Beck (1976)
Window of tolerance (Siegel)
Siegel's window of tolerance sheds light on social arousal: feared situations push you out of the zone of calm. Learning to return to it (breathing, grounding) makes exposure bearable. Do you spot the moment when social anxiety makes you 'check out'?
Sources: Daniel J. Siegel (1999)
These frameworks do not constitute a medical diagnosis.
Resources & exercise
7-day observation journal
Each day, spot one situation where “Performance” showed up. Note the automatic thought, the emotion (0–100) and what you did. Then write one more balanced, alternative reading. After 7 days, re-read your notes: the recurring patterns become visible — the first step to change them.
Support resources
If you are struggling, you are not alone. United States: call or text 988 (Suicide & Crisis Lifeline, 24/7). Elsewhere: find your local line at findahelpline.com. This report supports self-knowledge and does not replace a consultation with a psychologist or doctor.
Your answers in detail
1. Do you feel anxious at the thought of meeting new people?
Answer : Often
You answered "Often". Can you tell me a little more about when this comes up for you?
As soon as I have to speak up or meet new people, I spend hours anticipating and I feel judged the whole time.
2. Do you avoid starting conversations with people you don't know well?
Answer : Very often
And how long have you noticed this?
Since adolescence; I learned to avoid situations or to over-prepare, but it really limits my life.
3. Do group conversations make you uncomfortable?
Answer : Sometimes
4. Do you dread phone calls, especially with strangers?
Answer : Sometimes
5. Do you avoid parties, gatherings or social events out of anxiety?
Answer : Often
6. Do you dread one-on-one meals or coffees with people you're not very familiar with?
Answer : Sometimes
7. …
The next questions (7, 8…) continue in your test. This sample only shows the beginning — the full test has 60 questions, and every answer refines your report.
What now?
You've just seen what your answers reveal. Your Full Assessment goes further: a personalized, step-by-step path to turn this understanding into concrete change — at your own pace.
Get YOUR Social Phobia (In-Depth) report
Answer the 60 questions, then unlock your full report: interpretation, 9 clinical reading frameworks, recommendations and PDF — from 1.99 €.
← Back to the test page